From: Eeyore on


jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:

> krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote:
> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com says...
>
> >A pipe "threader" would be called a "die".
> >
> >> He had two kinds; one was
> >> easy to use and the other one was a PITA for a little weak
> >> kid to use.
> >
> >....but he made you use the hard one? ;-)
> >
> Yea, how did you know?

Because you said " one was easy to use and the other one was a PITA for a little
weak kid to use. "

Graham

From: Eeyore on


jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:

> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
> >> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >$30 a month is massively expensive for USENET.
> >>
> >> I don't think so. The service provided was 7x24, never down
> >> and the people knew what was going whenever something odd
> >> was happening. When I said I got what I paid for, I meant
> >> that the service was superb, timely, and absent of all bullshit.
> >
> >I pay $2.95 for news access and it seems just fine too. 24/7 is the norm.
>
> When I bought the service DOS 6.0 and Win 3.11 was the usual
> ISP software run. These guys were running Unix on Alphas. If
> there was a glitch on my end, I could call their help line, ask
> the guy if the systems were up. He would yell across his office
> wall if there were any problems and get an immediate answer.

I pretty much get that from my ISP too.


> There wree no 500-Q&A sales mazes to go through before getting
> my question answered. That was worth $30/month for not spending
> my time on bullshit.

I don't have that problem either. I'm paying ?17.99 p.c.m. but that is for an
8Mbps connection.

Graham

From: Eeyore on


jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:

> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >Over here you can get an ADSL connection for ?12.99 a month.
> >>
> >> I can get connection for $5/month if I wish a lack of service.
> >
> >What do you mean by 'lack of service' ?
> >
> >Is this more negative thinkiong ?
>
> No. I'm quite fussy since I was in the computer biz.
> If there's problem, I'd like to be able to analyze and
> produce are reason for the problem within 10 minutes.
> I can't do that if I have to go through the usual help
> desk sales menu before dealing with the problem. I also
> want to talk with somebody who can touch the computer systems
> rather than a desk in India.

I can't fault you there. My current ISP is based ~ 20 mi away and also still has
a proper 'personal' service too.

Graham

From: Eeyore on


jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:

> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote:
> ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message
>
> >> I don't want bells and whistles. I want pure, unadulterated
> >> comm service. All the fluff is a waste of CPU cycles and my
> >> time.
> >
> >Yet you can not access the web. Not really a working communications service,
> >is it?
>
> I run software on my computer that cannot salivate and chew gum at
> the same time. As a result of this lack of computing ability,
> it crashes because of buffer overruns.

Do you have an aversion to upgrading ?

Ppl are giving away lower end Pentiums now !

There's an auction on ebay uk that ends in 5 hours for no less that *five*
Pentium 600 PCs - ok they've had the hard drives and memory removed but these are
inexpensively replaced and the current high bid is......

99 pence ! for five computers

Graham

From: unsettled on
jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:

> We are already feeling the after effects of going all Dem.
> I'm not even going to have to wait 3 months to say I told you
> so.

> /BAH

The "other" feeding frenzy.