Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: lucasea on 15 Nov 2006 10:51 "unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message news:3db4a$455af1fa$4fe7190$15742(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... > Ben Newsam wrote: > >> On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 19:11:36 -0600, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> >> wrote: >> >> >>>There's a Marxist-socialist undercurrent in this >>>discussion which seems to want to equate the value >>>of all work and all workers. >> >> >> Only in your own mind and in your posts. Nobody else mentions Marx, >> and nobody else has mentioned equal value of all work or workers. >> Nobody else seems to think it is relevant. > > Part and parcel of your doublespeak world. You're so > ignorant you puppet Marxist lines and don't even > realize it. And *you're* just the one to save us from ourselves. Riiiiight. Eric Lucas
From: krw on 15 Nov 2006 10:52 In article <ejf1oi$8ss_009(a)s792.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com says... > In article <MPG.1fc3ca869a3bbd6f989b41(a)news.individual.net>, > krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote: > >In article <ejcktl$8qk_007(a)s858.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com says... > >> In article <a871b$45574416$49ecffa$23510(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, > >> unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: > >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> > > >> >> In article <9a071$4557314e$49ecffa$23098(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, > >> >> unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>>>In article <4555F0FA.3C4FF876(a)hotmail.com>, > >> >>>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>>>unsettled wrote: > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>>>I am at a slight loss in the > >> >>>>>>medicine coverage if I use Canadian pricing as > >> >>>>>>the basis, but way ahead if I use USA prices. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>>Why are the same medicines more expensive in the USA ? > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>>We pay the development costs. > >> >>> > >> >>>And we generously sell the medicines for less overseas. > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> It has nothing to do with generosity. > >> > > >> >There's no significant profit involved. What would you call it? > >> > >> There is a profit over manufacturing costs. It just doesn't > >> recoup the research costs to the point of feeding cash into > >> current research. Another advantage is presence. A lot of > >> the manufacturing appears to be getting moved to those countries > >> with tax benefits, etc. > >> > >> I'm waiting until India and China figure out how to run clean rooms. > > > > "SAN JOSE, Calif. =3F IBM Corp. has entered into an agreement to > > take a 24 percent stake for $150 million in one of India's > > fledging wafer fab companies =3F India Semiconductor Manufacturing > > Co. (ISMC), according to the Business Standard in India." > > > >http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=164901668 > > > Aren't these fabs as "fussy" as chemical plants? More so. They're rather expensive too. -- Keith
From: krw on 15 Nov 2006 10:54 In article <455B23A3.783BC859(a)hotmail.com>, rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > > krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com says... > > > > >> I'm waiting until India and China figure out how to run clean rooms. > > > > > > "SAN JOSE, Calif. =3F IBM Corp. has entered into an agreement to > > > take a 24 percent stake for $150 million in one of India's > > > fledging wafer fab companies =3F India Semiconductor Manufacturing > > > Co. (ISMC), according to the Business Standard in India." > > > > > >http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=164901668 > > > > > Aren't these fabs as "fussy" as chemical plants? > > At least as. At least they don't blow up though. Is that why the chemicals are stored in hardened bunkers? Better not let the silene loose! -- Keith
From: krw on 15 Nov 2006 10:56 In article <455A9954.6BFB8946(a)hotmail.com>, rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > > krw wrote: > > > lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net says... > > > "krw" <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote in message > > > > > > > > (of course I don't have a phone line, so...). > > > > > > Well, that latter would be the real issue then, not the distance to a hub. > > > > No, you ditz! I choose not to have a phone line (too expensive), > > so if I were close enough for DSL it wouldn't matter. Geez! > > Dare one ask how you post here ? Cable. Jeez! > What does a phone line cost btw ? When I got rid of them they were about $48/mo each. -- Keith
From: krw on 15 Nov 2006 10:57
In article <ejf24s$8ss_013(a)s792.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com says... > In article <MPG.1fc459ba145f0210989b5d(a)news.individual.net>, > krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote: > >In article <Lzv6h.6398$Sw1.5307(a)newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>, > >lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net says... > >> > >> "krw" <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote in message > >> news:MPG.1fc3cb5179e833c9989b43(a)news.individual.net... > >> > > >> > (of course I don't have a phone line, > >> > so...). > >> > >> Well, that latter would be the real issue then, not the distance to a hub. > > > >No, you ditz! I choose not to have a phone line (too expensive), > >so if I were close enough for DSL it wouldn't matter. Geez! > > > This makes you appreciate that other news group. Quite a difference, eh? -- Keith |