Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 28 Jan 2007 20:06 unsettled wrote: > Eeyore wrote: > > mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: > > > >> Would Germany have come on its own couple centuries earlier > > > > There wasn't a Germany centuries earlier. > > Irrelevant. Do you get any more stupid than this ? Graham
From: unsettled on 28 Jan 2007 20:13 Eeyore wrote: > > unsettled wrote: > > >>Eeyore wrote: >> >>>mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Would Germany have come on its own couple centuries earlier >>> >>>There wasn't a Germany centuries earlier. >> >>Irrelevant. > > > Do you get any more stupid than this ? Go find a brain, any brain, even a dead one, and have it transplanted. You'll come out better for it.
From: Eeyore on 28 Jan 2007 20:15 unsettled wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: > > unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: > >>Ken Smith wrote: > >>>unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: > >>>>Ken Smith wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>Now, I think you will agree that the US has some responcibility for the > >>>>>killings that are happening as the result of the US letting loose the > >>>>>"rabid pitbulls". > >>>> > >>>>I don't agree. > >>> > >>>Why don't you agree? It seems to be purely based on logic from the above. > >>>Perhaps you just need that AND gate. > >> > >>Because I place the blame where it belongs, exclusively with > >>the individuals doing the killing. Everything else is bullshit. > > > > So would you blame only the "rabid pitbull" of my example? It seemed to > > me that you earlier agreed that the one who opened the cage was at fault. > > Perhaps I misread it and you would not blame them. > > I don't blame a person who, for organic reasons, has no > ability to know the difference between right and wrong. Organic reasons ? Is this the same kind of talk as Gen Ripper whose vital fluids were 'contaminated' perchance ? Graham
From: Eeyore on 28 Jan 2007 20:17 Demon Lord of Confusion wrote: > §ñühw¤£f attempted to confuse the > issue further by squeaking: > > The Demon Prince of Absurdity pinched out a steaming pile of: > >>unsettled did the cha-cha, and screamed: > >> > >>>>>Was Hopkins a zealot or simply a very evil man ? > >>>> > >>>> The two are not mutually exclusive. > >>>> > >>>> In my experience, most zealots err on the side of "inhumanity" and > >>>> if you use that a definition of evil, they are evil. > (www.godhatesfags.com > >>>> - are they zealots or simply evil?) > >>> > >>> Most fags are zealots of a sort. > >> > >>So, what leads you to believe that dehumanising people for their > >>sexuality is in any way rational? > > > > Try as you might; you cant fix stupid. FYI > > HTH > > Nope. He thinks *Pooh Bear* is "politically correct". Feh. Wingnuts... What's that about Pooh ? Graham
From: Eeyore on 28 Jan 2007 20:20
unsettled wrote: > Phil Carmody wrote: > > unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> writes: > >>Eeyore wrote: > >>>unsettled wrote: > >>>>Eeyore wrote: > >>>>>unsettled wrote: > >>>>>>Eeyore wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>Christian abortionist killers live exclusively in the USA. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>To use one of your favorite expressions, "Cite?: > >>>>> > >>>>>How about you show me an example outside the USA ? I'm not aware of any. > >>>> > >>>>It is your statement, so it is yours to prove, not for me to disprove. > >>> > >>>That would require me to prove a negative which as I'm sure you're > >>>aware isn't possible. > >> > >>We don't know it is a negative till you can prove it. > >> > >>Care to rephrase the logically offensive statements? It only > >>requires the addition of three words. > >> > >>>So, how about you show me an example outside the USA ? I'm not aware of any. > >> > >>Don't need to. > > > > Actually, to counter his point, rather than just get pathetically > > hissy, you do. > > Can you stop being an idiot for a few minutes and try to follow the discussion? I've been > told it is difficult to keep up in the back. Your squirming and turning in attempt to avoid a legitimate question is becoming increasingly desperate and wholly laughable. Graham |