From: Eeyore on


jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:

> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
> >> MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
> >> > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us:
> >> >
> >> >>> You don't need an anechoic chamber btw.
> >> >>
> >> >>How do you measure the EMF in "noisy" environments?
> >> >>Or don't you need numbers anymore?
> >> >
> >> > Device off, sensors read baseline noise reading.
> >> >
> >> > Device on, sensors read local differential. Extrapolations get
> >> >made, figures get arrived at. Task complete.
> >>
> >> Your test has a big huge unfixable flaw.
> >
> >Perhaps you'd like to elaborate on that assertion ?
>
> The device has to be unplugged to get the baseline reading.

That's what "device off" MEANS !

Good Lord ! How daft are you ?

Graham

From: unsettled on
Eeyore wrote:
>
> jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
>
>
>>MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
>>
>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us:
>>>
>>>> MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Device off, sensors read baseline noise reading.
>>>>>
>>>>> Device on, sensors read local differential. Extrapolations get
>>>>>made, figures get arrived at. Task complete.
>>>>
>>>>No wonder my stove doesn't work.
>>>
>>>It is your brain that isn't working.
>>
>>Most devices these days are in warm start mode. Instead
>>of measuring before and after power-on, the tests need
>>to measure before and after _plug-in_.
>
>
> Nothing is measured when it isn't plugged in !

You display your ignorance. The background is measured.

When's that brain transplant?
From: Eeyore on


jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:

> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> And how much did it cost you to have your anechoic chamber built?
> >> >
> >> >Why do you think he himself needs one ?
> >> >
> >> >You can rent them off test houses you know or indeed use an open field
> >> > site.
> >>
> >> If his company doesn't use production line assembling, then
> >> he is making them "by hand". Each one needs to be tested because
> >> a different "process" is used to make each individual system.
> >
> >You mean PCs ?
> >
> >All the component parts are compliant. The law assumes that any system made
> >of compliant parts will itself comply.
>
> I wouldn't assume that.

It's a perfectly reasonable method.


> > Otherwise it *would* have been a nightmare !
>
> Of course it is a nightmare. Why do you think we have the regs?

It's not a nightmare. I should know, I'm the one dealing with it in my work not
you.

Graham

From: Eeyore on


jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:

> Note that a tech is paid to have tunnel vision.

Not today there aren't.

Graham

From: unsettled on
Eeyore wrote:

>
> jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
>
>
>>Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>You don't need an anechoic chamber btw.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>How do you measure the EMF in "noisy" environments?
>>>>>>Or don't you need numbers anymore?
>>>>>
>>>>> Device off, sensors read baseline noise reading.
>>>>>
>>>>> Device on, sensors read local differential. Extrapolations get
>>>>>made, figures get arrived at. Task complete.
>>>>
>>>>Your test has a big huge unfixable flaw.
>>>
>>>Perhaps you'd like to elaborate on that assertion ?
>>
>>The device has to be unplugged to get the baseline reading.
>
>
> That's what "device off" MEANS !
>
> Good Lord ! How daft are you ?

LOL

These days "device off" isn't really off.

When's that brain transplant?