Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 2 Oct 2006 19:43 Gordon wrote: > On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 23:50:11 +0100, Eeyore wrote: > >mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: > >> "T Wake" writes: > >> > >> >The victory conditions are either nonsensical or nonachievable. Has any "War > >> >on Terror" been won? > >> > > >> The term "War on Terror" is a misnomer. It really should be "The war > >> on Islamic extremism". Terror is just a tool. > > > >Obfuscation noted. > > > >So, are you saying it's possible to win a 'war on Islamic extremism' ? > > > >Graham > > I think it will prove possible, if this current situation is > managed such that the radical terrorist cells are not attacked > with such vigor that the core leaders are all wiped out too > quickly. It will be better to leave the terrorist cells operating > and use them to lure other would-be terrorists into their groups, > then exterminate all but the leaders. Repeat the process several > times and bleed the population dry of any would-be terrorists, > then go after the backbone leaders...a Darwinian selection sort > of process... You sound completely nuts to me ! Graham
From: Eeyore on 2 Oct 2006 19:47 John Fields wrote: > On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 19:59:42 +0100, "T Wake" wrote: > >"John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message > >> > >> So what? With world domonation as its goal, one would expect it > >> would strike world-wide, as the opportunity arose. > > > > > >Whose goal? "It" isn't really appropriate to define the long term aims of a > >disparate group of organisations. Are "they" trying to dominate the world or > >destroy western society or convert every one or... > > --- > "It" being radical Islam, the goal, in my opinion, would be to > convert everyone to Islam and have them be subject to control by > Muslim jurists, the goal being total world domination by Islam. > > Refusal to convert would result in death. Do you often conjure up such idiotic ideas out of thin air ? Graham
From: John Fields on 2 Oct 2006 19:54 On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 20:13:49 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >John Fields wrote: > >> On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 15:57:00 +0100, Eeyore wrote: >> >lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: >> >> >> Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that Bush is the next >> >> Hitler, just that there *are* parallels between their misanthropic behavior, >> >> if hugely different in degree and consequence. >> > >> >Very different. The outcome could be similar though. This is why the USA needs >> >to be halted in its current idiotic behaviour. >> >> --- >> And just how do you propose to do that? > >There's this thing called public opinion and it affects this other thing called >politics. --- Definitions aren't answers. I'll ask you again: "Just how do you propose to do that?" -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: John Fields on 2 Oct 2006 20:04 On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 19:21:28 GMT, "Homer J Simpson" <nobody(a)nowhere.com> wrote: > >"John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message >news:6ln0i296ogmudnj5hhpl3nl9gadkfo6o9c(a)4ax.com... > >> Of course. What you don't hear about is the clandestine work that's >> being done. You're not supposed to. > >And yet the Israelis get what they need done in a far more competent manner >with only a few errors. --- What does that have to do with clandestine work to which you're not privy? -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: John Fields on 2 Oct 2006 20:06
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 19:21:29 GMT, "Homer J Simpson" <nobody(a)nowhere.com> wrote: > >"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:45215FBD.CA21777D(a)hotmail.com... >> >> >> Jim Thompson wrote: >> >>> N'est pas? >> >> Your 'French' is dreadful. > >But he has an 8" tongue! --- You're disgusting. -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer |