From: Ben Newsam on 2 Oct 2006 20:17 On 29 Sep 2006 09:06:40 -0700, science_for_jihad(a)yahoo.com wrote: > The CV should contain information >reflecting the academic level reached by the candidate and his work >experience. The information however should not be so accurate as to >identify the candidate. An appropriately fantasious nickname and a >birth date corresponding to the approximate age of the candidate should >also be provided LOL!
From: John Fields on 2 Oct 2006 21:21 On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:12:39 GMT, "Homer J Simpson" <nobody(a)nowhere.com> wrote: > ><lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message >news:GreUg.962$NE6.715(a)newssvr11.news.prodigy.com... > >> Yes, and what details were left of out the other anecdote that hide the >> "whole story"? Once you start to see the actual details, you can >> understand rather than simply label and refuse to understand. I'm not >> saying the other incident wasn't a case of racism, it may well have >> been...I'm just saying that the anecdote, as written, did not "prove" that >> racism is rampant in the US, as the poster appeared to intend. > >List some other countries where a man of one race was murdered men of >another by being dragged to death behind a truck. --- Why? Is racism only involved when someone is killed by being dragged behind a truck and decapitated? --- Google ethnic cleansing, apartheid, and all the racist terms you can think of for a clue. All that incident in Jasper, Texas, proved was that three racist whites killed a black man. Two of them were sentenced to death by lethal injection, and the third was sentenced to life. If this was a racist society they would all have gotten off with a year or so, if that. Not that we don't still have problems, but we're working on it. -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: John Fields on 2 Oct 2006 21:32 On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 22:20:10 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >John Fields wrote: > >> We're not >> here to appease a bunch of thugs who want nothing less than to take >> over the world for their own perverted ends > >Since that won't happen what are you so worried about. > >You're legitimising the thugs by taking them so seriously. --- I see. So by not taking them seriously that will automatically prevent them from achieving their nefarious goals? How convenient! Just don't believe in them and they'll disappear? Sounds to me like you're just trying to buy some extra time for your buddies. -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: John Fields on 2 Oct 2006 21:35 On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 22:25:30 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >John Fields wrote: > >> I think they're talking about buggery, Graham. > >Such huge intellects work in strange ways. --- Hmmmmm... I doubt whether it's huge 'intellects' you're interested in. :-O -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: John Fields on 2 Oct 2006 21:37
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 22:26:25 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >John Fields wrote: > >> On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 17:32:11 +0100, Eeyore wrote: >> >Gordon wrote: >> > >> >> This is sad and very unfortunate. The thing we must ask ourselves >> >> is, had I been one of the cops would/should I have waited for the >> >> suspect to pull what ever he had in his pocket out and just hope >> >> it wasn't a gun? >> >> >> >> I should think there was a language barrier, and the suspect >> >> didn't understand what the cops were trying to tell him to do and >> >> the cops didn't understand the suspect's replies to their >> >> commands. The cops probably thought he was going for a gun, and >> >> weren't willing to just wait and see if he started shooting. >> > >> >This is a problem in a country where gun ownership is so widespread of course. >> >> --- >> Less of a problem than in the UK where if the perp had a gun and the >> cops didn't _they'd_ probably be dead. > >Your fondness for killing is noted. --- Fondness for killing your bullshit? Unbounded!!! -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer |