Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: John Fields on 3 Oct 2006 10:45 On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:39:31 GMT, "Homer J Simpson" <nobody(a)nowhere.com> wrote: > >"John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message >news:a8q3i2p8c069ke06esqnp7se8h32ekc04r(a)4ax.com... > >>>What do you have to do with intelligent discussion? >>> >> Merely participate. >> >> And you? > >Lead. --- From the rear? -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: Keith on 3 Oct 2006 10:55 In article <nImUg.45564$bf5.35021(a)edtnps90>, nobody(a)nowhere.com says... > > "John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message > news:a8q3i2p8c069ke06esqnp7se8h32ekc04r(a)4ax.com... > > >>What do you have to do with intelligent discussion? > >> > > Merely participate. > > > > And you? > > Lead. Ok, so you ate a lot of it, as a child. -- Keith
From: Eeyore on 3 Oct 2006 11:03 John Fields wrote: > On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 23:50:11 +0100, Eeyore wrote: > >mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: > >> "T Wake" writes: > >> > >> >The victory conditions are either nonsensical or nonachievable. Has any "War > >> >on Terror" been won? > >> > > >> The term "War on Terror" is a misnomer. It really should be "The war > >> on Islamic extremism". Terror is just a tool. > > > >Obfuscation noted. > > > >So, are you saying it's possible to win a 'war on Islamic extremism' ? > > --- > We won the one on German extremism so who's to say it's not possible > to win this one? The Nazi party was genuinely popular. That's one reason they got elected. Islamist extremism *isn't* popular. Although it may become more so as thew USA continues to bumble its way from one disaster to another. Graham
From: Eeyore on 3 Oct 2006 11:05 John Fields wrote: > On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 23:55:44 +0100, Eeyore wrote: > >John Fields wrote: > > >> You're not, you're just a coward who's afraid to go out and do > >> the bombing you'd really like to. > > > >Don't be so absurd. It sems you can only relate to violent ideas. > > --- > Not at all true, but when I read your violent rhetoric I like to > translate it into visuals which depict what you'd like to do if you > weren't afraid of the reprisals. Show where I have espoused violence. The only violently inclined ppl in this thread are yourself, Thompson and Terrell. Violent even to the point of making personal threats. Graham
From: Ken Smith on 3 Oct 2006 11:08
In article <eft9s4$8ss_002(a)s888.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: [....] >is national security. I suppose you long for the days of the >Clintons where the goal was to breakdown all national security. Oh yes, those attempts to kill OBL were horrible. The Bush admins policy of ignoring him even after the FBI's evidence that he was behind the Cole bombing was certainly a better policy. It really kept us much safer. -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge |