Microwave brain scrambler?
in [Design]
|
From: Winston on 12 Mar 2010 17:43 On 3/12/2010 1:27 PM, AZ Nomad wrote: (...) >> There would be no crime because no judge would ever prosecute. > > You're insane. Innocence is expensive, AZ Thanks for your thoughts on the subject. --Winston
From: Winston on 12 Mar 2010 17:57 On 3/12/2010 10:29 AM, osr(a)uakron.edu wrote: > You dont get it! 1 mW/Cm^2 does NOT penetrate the skull with enough > power to do biological anything. Period, DENADA! That is 1 mW/cm^2 within the brain. Obviously there are efficiency losses on the way from MOPA to the target, but yes, there is a reproducible physiological effect. > You must be the new green Xenon/Radium etc Nope. > Go away troll, you have NO clue about RF physics. The reason I asked was to get new knowledge, for which I am grateful. > The effect of which you speak does not exist, The effect exists. > or nobody would be > painting AM or FM transmitter towers with the power on... Which is > done all the time.. The minimum frequency for which the effect is seen was at 147 MHz, amplitude modulated at a continuous 16 Hz, not frequency modulated at 20Hz - 20 KHz or amplitude modulated at 50Hz ~12KHz. Thanks for your thoughts, Steve. --Winston
From: Winston on 12 Mar 2010 18:14 On 3/11/2010 8:59 PM, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote: > On 11/03/2010 15:28, Winston wrote: (...) >> Manager can just smile and say "Now what could I have done to cause >> that?" > > "That big microwave dish that swung round and focused on me". Dish is concealed above the suspended ceiling, for example. There is no evidence it exists. (Did I mention that?) > Lawyer for perp subpoenas all documentation on installation. No, the lawyer for the perp has no idea the transmitter exists. He has a crack head insisting that he was dazed for a moment, as if that were an unusual occurrence. :) The lawyer for the perp is more than fully occupied. >> The customer's lawyer and any prospective judge are both the property >> of the megacorporation that owns the restaurant anyway, >> so what is the concern? > > None. > It's cheaper to hand over a few hundred, or thousand, dollars than get > involved in the cheapest lawsuit. Yes. But the money goes to campaign contributions, not the perp's lawyer and certainly not the perp. --Winston
From: Dirk Bruere at NeoPax on 12 Mar 2010 22:27 On 12/03/2010 22:40, Winston wrote: > See section #2 above. The transmitter wouldn't be used by people > who are subject to law. Only subsidiaries of Big Business for > whom there is no risk of prosecution attached. And this is in the same world where McDonalds gets sued by a customer who spills hot coffee on herself? -- Dirk http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK http://www.blogtalkradio.com/onetribe - Occult Talk Show
From: Dirk Bruere at NeoPax on 12 Mar 2010 22:33
On 12/03/2010 23:14, Winston wrote: > On 3/11/2010 8:59 PM, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote: >> On 11/03/2010 15:28, Winston wrote: > > (...) > >>> Manager can just smile and say "Now what could I have done to cause >>> that?" >> >> "That big microwave dish that swung round and focused on me". > > Dish is concealed above the suspended ceiling, for example. > There is no evidence it exists. (Did I mention that?) And it is secretly manufactured and secretly installed and nobody knows its there except the BigMac employees, who are, of course, utterly loyal and would never rat out their beloved management. >> Lawyer for perp subpoenas all documentation on installation. > > No, the lawyer for the perp has no idea the transmitter exists. > He has a crack head insisting that he was dazed for a moment, > as if that were an unusual occurrence. :) And the manager can tell who's the crackhead just by looking eh? Of course, it would never be used on a customer who's just pissed at the poor service. Remember, it would only take one mistake. > The lawyer for the perp is more than fully occupied. Lawyers are *never* fully occupied - that's why there are so many of them. >>> The customer's lawyer and any prospective judge are both the property >>> of the megacorporation that owns the restaurant anyway, >>> so what is the concern? >> >> None. >> It's cheaper to hand over a few hundred, or thousand, dollars than get >> involved in the cheapest lawsuit. > > Yes. But the money goes to campaign contributions, not the perp's lawyer > and certainly not the perp. Tell that to those who have sued such businesses on ludicrously trivial grounds, and won. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liebeck_v._McDonald%27s_Restaurants "Liebeck's attorneys argued that McDonald's coffee was "defective", claiming that it was too hot and more likely to cause serious injury than coffee served at any other place. Moreover, McDonald's had refused several prior opportunities to settle for less than the $640,000 ultimately awarded." Of course, maybe you can sell this device to big restaurant chains in Uzbekistan where political prisoners get boiled alive. No biggie there... -- Dirk http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK http://www.blogtalkradio.com/onetribe - Occult Talk Show |