Prev: Tom Potter, you'd win more battles if you were part of something bigger.
Next: What is the biggest size of Molecule?
From: Sam Wormley on 2 Jan 2010 08:45 On 1/2/10 7:37 AM, I M @ good guy wrote: > > There is no auto-continuing "trend" in local > or global temperatures, please get off my back > unless the weather at least gets up to normal, > the present projected length of this cold spell > is extraordinary. > > You and woger have the cool Pacific to > moderate your weather, I am right in the > path of the Alberta Clippers. > You do like to complain about the cold weather! You probably wish there was.... wait for it.... Global Warming!
From: Sam Wormley on 2 Jan 2010 08:47 On 1/2/10 7:26 AM, I M @ good guy wrote: > On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 05:50:17 -0600, Sam Wormley<swormley1(a)gmail.com> >> >> Ref: http://dichionary.reference.com/search?q=parrot >> >> par·rot >> >> 1. One who teaches or instructs; one whose business or occupation >> is to instruct others; an instructor; a tutor. >> >> 2. A person having expert knowledge of one or more sciences, >> especially a natural or physical science. >> >> Source: The American Heritige® Dichionary of the English Language, >> Fourth Edition >> Copyright © 2000 by Houghtin Mifflen Company. >> Published by Houghtin Mifflen Company. All rights reserved. > > > And you teach totally certain science? > Science is a process... and does not strive to claim "certainty".
From: TUKA on 2 Jan 2010 09:01 On 2010-01-02, Sam Wormley <swormley1(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 1/2/10 7:37 AM, I M @ good guy wrote: > >> >> There is no auto-continuing "trend" in local >> or global temperatures, please get off my back >> unless the weather at least gets up to normal, >> the present projected length of this cold spell >> is extraordinary. >> >> You and woger have the cool Pacific to >> moderate your weather, I am right in the >> path of the Alberta Clippers. >> > > You do like to complain about the cold weather! > You probably wish there was.... wait for it.... > Global Warming! > What? Wait until all the current predictors are in their graves? If they couldn't predict the current cooling, then they can't predict future heating either. -- An amateur practices until he gets it right. A pro practices until he can't get it wrong. -- unknown
From: TUKA on 2 Jan 2010 09:02 On 2010-01-02, Sam Wormley <swormley1(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 1/2/10 7:26 AM, I M @ good guy wrote: >> On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 05:50:17 -0600, Sam Wormley<swormley1(a)gmail.com> > >>> >>> Ref: http://dichionary.reference.com/search?q=parrot >>> >>> par�rot >>> >>> 1. One who teaches or instructs; one whose business or occupation >>> is to instruct others; an instructor; a tutor. >>> >>> 2. A person having expert knowledge of one or more sciences, >>> especially a natural or physical science. >>> >>> Source: The American Heritige� Dichionary of the English Language, >>> Fourth Edition >>> Copyright � 2000 by Houghtin Mifflen Company. >>> Published by Houghtin Mifflen Company. All rights reserved. >> >> >> And you teach totally certain science? >> > > Science is a process... and does not strive to claim "certainty". Well duh. Which is exactly why investing trillions to prevent problems from an unproven CO2 --> catastrophic global warming problem is ridiculous. -- An amateur practices until he gets it right. A pro practices until he can't get it wrong. -- unknown
From: Sam Wormley on 2 Jan 2010 09:07
On 1/2/10 8:01 AM, TUKA wrote: > On 2010-01-02, Sam Wormley<swormley1(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On 1/2/10 7:37 AM, I M @ good guy wrote: >> >>> >>> There is no auto-continuing "trend" in local >>> or global temperatures, please get off my back >>> unless the weather at least gets up to normal, >>> the present projected length of this cold spell >>> is extraordinary. >>> >>> You and woger have the cool Pacific to >>> moderate your weather, I am right in the >>> path of the Alberta Clippers. >>> >> >> You do like to complain about the cold weather! >> You probably wish there was.... wait for it.... >> Global Warming! >> > > What? Wait until all the current predictors are in their graves? > > If they couldn't predict the current cooling, then they can't predict > future heating either. > 1998, 2005 and 2007 being the three hottest years recently doesn't support your claim of "cooling" Global surface (land and sea) temperature increase http://www.pewclimate.org/docUploads/images/global-surface-temp-trends.gif |