Prev:  Tom Potter, you'd win more battles if you were part of something bigger.
Next: What is the biggest size of Molecule?
From: Marvin the Martian on 3 Jan 2010 11:52
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 13:04:50 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote:

> On 1/2/10 9:44 AM, I M @ good guy wrote:

>> You are nuts, aren't you? :-)
>
> Born out by the data:
>
> Here's some data from Iowa State University
> http://www.meteor.iastate.edu/faculty/takle/presentations.html
>
> More from University of Iowa
>
> http://www.engineering.uiowa.edu/faculty-staff/profile-directory/cee/
schnoor_j.php
>
>
>
>>
>> Decreasing high temperatures during the daytime
>> and increasing low temperatures at night, how awful, how will you
>> survive?
>
> After the summer of 1988, I embrace the cooler Iowa summers as a
> result of global warming. And with close to 2 inched extra
> precipitation per year, it's greener!

Okay... I just gotta killfile Wormley for awhile. I debunked his silly
websites over and over, and he just ignores it. Now "global warming"
means cooler climate.

I'm losing respect for Earthlings and general and I'm beginning to regard
Earthlings from the American midwest as brain damaged idiots no more
intelligent than the swine they raise. I gotta stop reading Wormley for
awhile.
From: Spencer Spindrift on 3 Jan 2010 13:29
On Dec 31 2009, 9:33 pm, Poetic Justice <PoeticJustice(a)talk-n-
dog...com> wrote:
> On 12/31/2009 4:22 PM, Spencer Spindrift wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 29, 9:00 pm, "Ouroboros Rex" <i...(a)casual.com> wrote:
> >> Marvin the Martian wrote:
> >>>>> On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 18:46:42 -0800, Eric Gisin wrote:
> >>>>> 1) A real science society wouldn't get involved in politics.
>
> >>>> To get funding, science grant proposals, had to use the PC word
> >>>> salad of the day.  There were posts made 15 years ago about this;
> >>>> IIRC, the term grantsmanship was used often.
>
> >>>> You are still trying to kill the messenger instead of identifying the
> >>>> real problem.
>
> >>> Why do you think that the hot fusion researchers, after promising a
> >>> working hot fusion reactor is just 10 years away, have been able to
> >>> promise that for the last 40 years?! Hot fusion is one of the big
> >>> funded research projects for engineers and physicist. If you
> >>> "discover" hot fusion, the funding immediately drys up and everyone
> >>> is unemployed. No way are we going to get hot fusion because it would
> >>> kill the golden goose.
>
> > Why do all my posts on this topic disappear into cyberspace? Could it
> > be because I bring up the taboo subject of overpopulation as the true
> > cause of climate change and advocate a death rate solution? If this
> > mss. vanishes I'll become a conspiracy k00k!
>
> > Spencer Primate
>
> You are a conspiracy kook
>
> ONLY YOU can prevent over population,  die early and die often.

I've tried suicide and it doesn't work.

S P Primate in Anglia CoE www.churchofeuthanasia.org

SAVE THE PLANET

KILL YOURSELF

4
From: Spencer Spindrift on 3 Jan 2010 13:32
On Dec 31 2009, 10:05 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/31/09 3:22 PM, Spencer Spindrift wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 29, 9:00 pm, "Ouroboros Rex"<i...(a)casual.com>  wrote:
> >> Marvin the Martian wrote:
> >>>>> On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 18:46:42 -0800, Eric Gisin wrote:
> >>>>> 1) A real science society wouldn't get involved in politics.
>
> >>>> To get funding, science grant proposals, had to use the PC word
> >>>> salad of the day.  There were posts made 15 years ago about this;
> >>>> IIRC, the term grantsmanship was used often.
>
> >>>> You are still trying to kill the messenger instead of identifying the
> >>>> real problem.
>
> >>> Why do you think that the hot fusion researchers, after promising a
> >>> working hot fusion reactor is just 10 years away, have been able to
> >>> promise that for the last 40 years?! Hot fusion is one of the big
> >>> funded research projects for engineers and physicist. If you
> >>> "discover" hot fusion, the funding immediately drys up and everyone
> >>> is unemployed. No way are we going to get hot fusion because it would
> >>> kill the golden goose.
>
> > Why do all my posts on this topic disappear into cyberspace? Could it
> > be because I bring up the taboo subject of overpopulation as the true
> > cause of climate change and advocate a death rate solution? If this
> > mss. vanishes I'll become a conspiracy k00k!
>
> > Spencer Primate
>
>    I could be that your news server or your news client don't
>    retain things for very long. Have you some real physics to
>    discuss?

Yes. Quantum Mechanics and plasma cosmology but that's a bit
complicated...
From: Sam Wormley on 3 Jan 2010 14:48
On 1/3/10 10:52 AM, Marvin the Martian wrote:

> Okay... I just gotta killfile Wormley for awhile. I debunked his silly
> websites over and over, and he just ignores it. Now "global warming"
> means cooler climate.
>
> I'm losing respect for Earthlings and general and I'm beginning to regard
> Earthlings from the American midwest as brain damaged idiots no more
> intelligent than the swine they raise. I gotta stop reading Wormley for
> awhile.

See you when you come back, Marvin!


From: Marvin the Martian on 3 Jan 2010 16:25
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 13:09:22 -0600, Bill Ward wrote:

> On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 08:07:19 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote:
>
>> On 1/2/10 8:01 AM, TUKA wrote:
>>> On 2010-01-02, Sam Wormley<swormley1(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 1/2/10 7:37 AM, I M @ good guy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> There is no auto-continuing "trend" in local or global temperatures,
>>>>> please get off my back unless the weather at least gets up to
>>>>> normal, the present projected length of this cold spell is
>>>>> extraordinary.
>>>>>
>>>>> You and woger have the cool Pacific to moderate your weather, I am
>>>>> right in the path of the Alberta Clippers.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> You do like to complain about the cold weather! You probably wish
>>>> there was.... wait for it.... Global Warming!
>>>>
>>>>
>>> What? Wait until all the current predictors are in their graves?
>>>
>>> If they couldn't predict the current cooling, then they can't predict
>>> future heating either.
>>>
>>>
>> 1998, 2005 and 2007 being the three hottest years recently doesn't
>> support your claim of "cooling"
>>
>> Global surface (land and sea) temperature increase
>>
>> http://www.pewclimate.org/docUploads/images/global-surface-temp-
> trends.gif
>
> Still out of date. Try and keep up.

Well.... I told that idiot Wormley a dozen times what is wrong with his
damned stupid graph:
1) The once again discredited for making up data Jones made this stupid
graph.
2) It isn't global temperature. If it was global temperature 1934 would
be as hot or hotter than 1998. It's "global Surface Temperature
'change'", which is pretty much whatever Jones wants it to be. The graph
is intentionally deceptive and made to fool weak minds. That's why
Wormley worships this damned graph as Gods One True Gospel.

It's stupid. And he never, ever addresses the issues that a proven liar
like Jones is behind it, nor does he address the fact that it isn't mean
global temperature at all. It's a bullshit graph.

But he just keeps posting it and posting it over and over. Wormley has no
shame at all, and is quite happy playing the troll.

Just killfile him. He's not worth the time.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Prev:  Tom Potter, you'd win more battles if you were part of something bigger.
Next: What is the biggest size of Molecule?