The Electric Car
in [Design]
|
From: Androcles on 26 Sep 2007 20:07 "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:46FAE9C1.276E5FAA(a)hotmail.com... : : : Androcles wrote: : : > "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote : > : rick_sobie(a)hotmail.com wrote: : > : : > : > Yeah this is really difficult to duplicate. It is rocket science. : > : > Someday scientists will study it. : > : > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYNwuLL_pOE : > : : > : Scientists have known about electrolysis for a LONG LONG time. : > : : > : You get less energy back (as flammable gases) than you put in (as : > electricity). : > : : > : It's a waste of energy. : > : : > : Graham : > : > ALL energy is wasted. Power stations are 34% efficient, : > give then up, go without electricity, you are wasting energy. : : If power stations ran on Brown's gas they'd be maybe 20% efficient. : : That's the point. How do calculate efficiency, dumbfuck? Oh wait, I know... you say "they'd be maybe" and hope to make a point. You failed... miserably, cracker. Cars are 18% efficient, give them up, go back to hunting mammoth, Neanderthal, and carry on dragging your knuckles. That's the point. You do know what a graham cracker is, I suppose?
From: rick_sobie on 26 Sep 2007 20:13 On Sep 26, 11:42 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > rick_so...(a)hotmail.com wrote: > > Eeyore wrote: > > > rick_so...(a)hotmail.com wrote: > > > > Eeyore wrote: > > > > > rick_so...(a)hotmail.com wrote: > > > > > > Eeyore wrote: > > > > > > > > Learn some science before spouting off a load of nonsese next time will you ? > > > > > > > Do you live in a cave? > > > > > > >http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/car-runs-on-water-inventor-to-be-k... > > > > > > Bwahahahaahahaa ! Do you live in an asylum ? > > > > > > Too funny. What do you do for an encore ? > > > > > Well people all over the world are doing it for themselves > > > > You mean fraudstera all over the world. > > > > > and youtube is just one place where you can see all sorts of people using a simple > > > > process of electro-statics to separate hydrogen and oxygen. > > > > It's one place where the fraudsters 'advertise'. And also where clueless morons like > > > you congregate patting your own stupid little backs. > > > > The 'device' in that car was making a few bubbles of Brown's Gas. Simply not enough to > > > power an engine but enough for a gullible journalist to fall for it. > > > Right. I believe you. I also believe you and a lot of other people > > want people to not make Brown's gas. > > > Except its too late to stop it. > > No-one's trying to STOP it ! Feel free to waste energy making it. > > > They use it in welding equipment all over the world. > > For very specific reasons where it makes sense to do so. > > > This guy from America in that video did not invent that welding > > equipment. Its in common use all over the world. > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hzJZJjo9MNA > > The fabled 'resonator' method of hydrolysis alleged to use less power than conventional > electrolysis. More 'junk science'. > > Whenever scientifically tested, the claims have been shown to be false. > > Even the originator of this video said he made no measurements ! So, this video shows an > example of the ordinary electrolysis of water. You get less power out than you put in. > That's pretty stupid for a start ! > > Graham bla bla bla it will never fly. Do you go to airports and say that? Are you one of those nay sayers? If you lived in the country, or on a farm, you would want to have a solar battery setup, and then you would produce your own power for your equipment for free using water. And not only that, but it has so many uses. From welding to running cars and tractors to heating water or heating your home. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVL8Q7Hqt6Y&mode=related&search=
From: John Fields on 26 Sep 2007 20:35 On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 00:20:31 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >Clever looking demonstrations with no measurements are purely there to impress the >terminally foolish. > >That means fuckwits like YOU. --- Clever-sounding arguments with no basis in logic are purely there to impress the fuckwits who pose them. That means fuckwits like you. Most of the rest of us can't stand you. -- JF
From: John Fields on 26 Sep 2007 20:37 On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 00:21:36 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >Androcles wrote: > >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote >> : rick_sobie(a)hotmail.com wrote: >> : >> : > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ItyiJ1uBUY >> : >> : Why waste energy making Brown's gas ? >> : >> : Graham >> >> Why waste energy cracking petroleum from crude? >> Why waste energy writing to a newsgroup when you can >> go back to sleep and enjoy your stupid ignorance? > >Does your head rattle ? > >It must be that pea inside it. --- The pee inside yours makes it slosh, yes? -- JF
From: John Fields on 26 Sep 2007 20:41
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 00:22:41 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >Androcles wrote: > >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote >> : rick_sobie(a)hotmail.com wrote: >> : >> : > Yeah this is really difficult to duplicate. It is rocket science. >> : > Someday scientists will study it. >> : > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYNwuLL_pOE >> : >> : Scientists have known about electrolysis for a LONG LONG time. >> : >> : You get less energy back (as flammable gases) than you put in (as >> electricity). >> : >> : It's a waste of energy. >> : >> : Graham >> >> ALL energy is wasted. Power stations are 34% efficient, >> give then up, go without electricity, you are wasting energy. > >If power stations ran on Brown's gas they'd be maybe 20% efficient. --- In keeping with one of your earlier posts calling others fuckwits for not showing their work, you should show the work which substantiates your conclusion, fuckwit. -- JF |