The world has never seen such freezing heat
in [Design]
|
Prev: Class D audio driver with external mosfets
Next: NE162 mixer: input/output impedance in balanced mode?
From: Richard The Dreaded Libertarian on 25 Nov 2008 14:12 On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 20:34:41 +0000, Eeyore wrote: > bill.sloman(a)ieee.org wrote: > >> Scarcely. The cooling was real enough, if insignificant - and probably >> had something to do with sulphur-dioxide-generated haze, which went away >> when we tackled acid rain. > > Is there 'probably' a global warming God too ? Of course - haven't you heard of ALGORE? >:-> (or maybe he's only the pope of warmingism - but people that have popes (and other cultists) generally believe that their pope is the physical embodiment of Gawd.) Cheers! Rich
From: bill.sloman on 25 Nov 2008 14:33 On 24 nov, 23:37, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > bill.slo...(a)ieee.org wrote: > > Bill Ward <bw...(a)REMOVETHISix.netcom.com> wrote: > > > > Perhaps you could explain in your own words the scientific basis and > > > evidence for your beliefs, then we could debate it properly. > > > That would be something of a waste of time. > > Indeed because there is NONE ! It's like vapourware. Graham - the master of the unmarked snip. The vapourware lies between Graham ears. In the sentences he snipped I did go on to point out that as long as the IPCC exists to detail the the scientific basis and evidence forfor global warming, it would be presumptuous of me to try to paraphrase their report, available at the URL below (which Graham also snipped - he doesn't like dealing with facts he can't understand). http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr.pdf -- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
From: bill.sloman on 25 Nov 2008 14:48 On 25 nov, 07:36, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > bill.slo...(a)ieee.org wrote: > > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > bill.slo...(a)ieee.org wrote: > > > > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > bill.slo...(a)ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > Scarcely. The cooling was real enough, if insignificant - and probably > > > > > > had something to do with sulphur-dioxide-generated haze, which went > > > > > > away when we tackled acid rain. > > > > > > Is there 'probably' a global warming God too ? > > > > > Why don't you ask her? > > > > So you DO believe in deities ? Explains a lot ! Rational thinking can go out > > > the window when a 'God' is about. > > > I didn't say that I thought that you'd get an answer. I did think that > > you'd be more usefully occupied praying to an unresponsive diety than > > you are in posting erroneous nonsense on a electronics user-group. > > Didactic non-response noted. With a didactic non-response? My response did at least have some content. Go back to your prayers. You are gullible enough to beleiver that they might work. -- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
From: Eeyore on 25 Nov 2008 16:30 James Arthur wrote: > bill.sloman(a)ieee.org wrote: > > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Besides, droughts are normal. They happened long before "AGW". Read a bible for instance. > > > > The current series of drought years in Australia doesn't look any too > > normal. Modern records didn't start until January 1788 and weren't > > all that comprehensive for the next fifty years, but they don't record > > anything like as bad as the current sequence of dry years > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drought_in_Australia > > "1880 to 1886 Drought in Victoria" > > > http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/nov/08/australia.drought > > "With many regions in their fifth year of drought, the > government yesterday called an emergency water summit > in Canberra." So a shorter drought than the 1880 to 1886 one ! Damn that CO2 in 1880 ! Graham
From: Eeyore on 25 Nov 2008 16:32
bill.sloman(a)ieee.org wrote: > Eeyore wrote: > > bill.slo...(a)ieee.org wrote: > > > Bill Ward <bw...(a)REMOVETHISix.netcom.com> wrote: > > > > > > Perhaps you could explain in your own words the scientific basis and > > > > evidence for your beliefs, then we could debate it properly. > > > > > That would be something of a waste of time. > > > > Indeed because there is NONE ! It's like vapourware. > > Graham - the master of the unmarked snip. The vapourware lies between > Graham ears. In the sentences he snipped I did go on to point out that > as long as the IPCC exists to detail the the scientific basis and > evidence forfor global warming, it would be presumptuous of me to try > to paraphrase their report, available at the URL below (which Graham > also snipped - he doesn't like dealing with facts he can't > understand). > > http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr.pdf The IPCC are a bunch of politically driven agenda idiots. Look how they got taken in by Mann. I wouldn't trust a word they say or print. Graham |