From: Eeyore on


bill.sloman(a)ieee.org wrote:

> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> > bill.slo...(a)ieee.org wrote:
> > > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > bill.slo...(a)ieee.org wrote:
> > > > > Scarcely. The cooling was real enough, if insignificant - and probably
> > > > > had something to do with sulphur-dioxide-generated haze, which went
> > > > > away when we tackled acid rain.
> >
> > > > Is there 'probably' a global warming God too ?
> >
> > > Why don't you ask her?
> >
> > So you DO believe in deities ? Explains a lot ! Rational thinking can go out
> > the window when a 'God' is about.
>
> I didn't say that I thought that you'd get an answer. I did think that
> you'd be more usefully occupied praying to an unresponsive diety than
> you are in posting erroneous nonsense on a electronics user-group.

Didactic non-response noted.

Graham

From: bill.sloman on
On 23 nov, 03:49, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com>
wrote:
> a7yvm109gf...(a)netzero.com wrote:
> > Eeyore wrote:
> > > z wrote:
> > > > Actually, GISS now reports the corrected October temps as 5th highest
>
> > > But they LIED initially ANYWAY !
>
> > That's absurd. Science works by self-correction mechanisms like this.
>
> You mean temperature works by self-correction mechanisms surely ?

If you weren't so depressing ignorant, you'd be aware that that the
Milankovitch orbital perturbations that seem to have been driving the
recent alternations between Ice Ages and interglacials need quite a
lot of positive feedback to generate the observed perturbations in
global temperature

http://www.globalwarmingart.com/wiki/Wikipedia:Milankovitch_cycles

Global temperatures go in for self-exaggeration rather than self-
correction.

Happily, we've already melted most of the snow cover off the top of
the northern hemisphere so that particular positive feed-back
mechanism is disabled, but the geological record strongly suggests
that there are others waiting to kick in when we get the atmospheric
CO2 levels high enough.

The end-Permian mass extinction took place a long time ago, but it has
been demonstrated that one of the activities going on around that time
was massive vulcanism erupting through coal beds, which seems to have
been nature's way of digging up a lot of coal and burning it

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permian%E2%80%93Triassic_extinction_event

--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
From: Whata Fool on
bill.sloman(a)ieee.org wrote:

>On the evidence available, you've screwed yourself, by confusing
>optimistic claims about how bioethanol might score like if some
>researcher or other got enough research grants to support the
>development of their favourite scheme with the dire reality of of the
>schemes that Dubbya has been subsidising.


You are overemphasizing the political aspect of US ethanol
production.

In summer, regulations (EPA, etc.) require lower emission
fuels, and 10 percent ethanol is one way gasoline is blended for
big city use.


Also, to reduce oil imports, a long term project of ethanol
(from sugar, not corn) is important.

In case of corn shortages, ethanol plants can be closed,
which is a much better situation that the existing problem with
rice, which will become a real bad problem for people unable or
unwilling to switch to a lower cost or more plentiful staple food.

Rice farmers are leaving the farms and going into other,
higher paying and less labor intensive jobs, and people will
suffer.





From: Eeyore on


bill.sloman(a)ieee.org wrote:

> On 23 nov, 03:49, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com>
> wrote:
> > a7yvm109gf...(a)netzero.com wrote:
> > > Eeyore wrote:
> > > > z wrote:
> > > > > Actually, GISS now reports the corrected October temps as 5th highest
> >
> > > > But they LIED initially ANYWAY !
> >
> > > That's absurd. Science works by self-correction mechanisms like this.
> >
> > You mean temperature works by self-correction mechanisms surely ?
>
> If you weren't so depressing ignorant, you'd be aware that that the
> Milankovitch orbital perturbations that seem to have been driving the
> recent alternations between Ice Ages and interglacials need quite a
> lot of positive feedback to generate the observed perturbations in
> global temperature

We're not talking about Ice Ages.

Stick to the point.

From: Eeyore on


Bill Ward wrote:

> bill.sloman wrote:
> >
> > Venus hasn't got any water left, and enough carbon dioxide in the
> > atmosphere to moderate the surface temperature all the way down to hot-
> > enough-to-melt-lead.
>
> Non sequitur, unless you live on Venus.
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus
>
> Now explain in your own words how traces of CO2 can affect Earth's surface
> temperatures in the presence of a large excess of water. Include the
> effects of latent heat convection, the near adiabatic lapse rate through
> the troposphere, and the observation that the effective radiating altitude
> and cloud tops are near each other.
>
> Can you do that, or are you just blowing smoke?

He may be good at letting the magic smoke out of components !

Graham