firewall without all the bloat
in [Freeware]
|
Prev: Microsoft Office Live Beta
Next: Avira AntiVir
From: Peter Seiler on 1 Sep 2006 18:42 In_Parentheses - 01.09.2006 15:34 : > Peter Seiler <psprivate(a)mailinator.com> wrote in > news:44F808FC.1040100(a)mailinator.com: > >> In_Parentheses - 01.09.2006 12:01 : >>> Ah, I already wondered when the "Quoting police" would come in. >>> Peter: you're boring, a PITA, and this is usenet alt (still >>> unmoderated), so either ignore the thread, or kill file me, but stop >>> interefering with a discussion if you have nothing to add to it! >> is yours an *argument* against mine? > > Just as much as yours is... and since you are *not* the moderator of > acf... (fill in the dots) you are right: I'm NOT the moderator and would'nt be such one even if this ng would be a moderated one. Beside wasting bandwidth etc. etc. in case of much fullquoting again and again, often within minutely responses, often additionally multi-x-posted, shorten the quotings is not a rule but for some good reasons a common recommendation for a good usenet behavior. And often you will find hundreds of fullquoting lines where the poster only say "thanks". Fullquoting more than often only is a pure lazyness(?). Ok, if you prefer fullquoting contrarely against the common recommendation (see how to quote)...its really up to you. EOD. -- by(e) PS spam will be killed
From: Comodo on 1 Sep 2006 19:00 »Q« wrote: > "Comodo" <melih(a)COMODOGROUP.COM> wrote in > <news:1157077237.029980.179450(a)74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com>: > > > »Q« wrote: > >> > >> AFAICT, every time you have been asked about what Launchpad does > >> and why it is bundled without the option not to install it, you > >> have not answered but only invited people to your forum to > >> discuss it. I don't have any idea whether Launchpad is good, > >> bad, or ugly, but I'm pretty sure that if you won't answer > >> questions about it here, people here will continue to be > >> suspicious of it. If all you want is to make your forum users > >> happy, posting answers only there is fine. If you want to > >> satisfy people in a.c.f as well, the only way to do it is to post > >> answers here also. > > > > Q > > > > you will see that your statement above is not true > > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.comp.freeware/browse_thread/thre > > ad/8a40c609cc084cf/eb27ceb3bd5b0bd1?lnk=st&q=comodo+firewall+launch > > pad&rnum=3&hl=en#eb27ceb3bd5b0bd1 pls check the others ngs where i > > have explained the reasons many times before. the above is one > > example. > > The one example you cite does nothing to convince me that I had the > wrong impression, and I'm not interested in searching all of Usenet > to find out whether or not you answer the questions in other groups. > > > The reason why I refer people to forums is because, all the > > arguments have already been made and all the explanations have > > already been made and decision about launchpad's future already > > has been reached by its users. Its all there, publicly available. > > No point in re-writing all that hence why I refer to the link. > > Very few people would like to wade through twenty pages of your > users' arguments about what it does or doesn't do or should or > shouldn't do. If you want to convince people it's trustworthy, > you'd really have to type up a summary of what it does and why, > along with the plans you have for changing it based on the feedback > you've gotten. If you see that as a waste of time, I won't argue, > but you don't seem to be changing a lot of minds here with your current > methods. > > > If you think we haven't covered any point about launchpad, we > > would love to hear from you! > > You've just been hearing from me. I'm not one who's posted questions > for you, just one suggesting you answer them. > > > As you will see our users are sophisticated and tech savvy users > > who know what they want and what they need! And they have been > > great at helping Comodo shape its firewall! > > I don't doubt it, but it's irrelevant to solving the PR problem you > have at the moment here. > > -- > »Q« eh? which PR problem? There are no questions about launchpad, just unfounded opinions! I am more than happy to answer any specific questions about the Launchpad! BTW: For everyone who said we don't listen to our users : Today we launched CPF v2.3 and it has the option to disable launchpad as was requested by our users! Melih
From: Bear Bottoms on 1 Sep 2006 19:20 On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 17:42:14 -0500, Peter Seiler <psprivate(a)mailinator.com> wrote: > In_Parentheses - 01.09.2006 15:34 : > >> Peter Seiler <psprivate(a)mailinator.com> wrote in >> news:44F808FC.1040100(a)mailinator.com: >> >>> In_Parentheses - 01.09.2006 12:01 : >>>> Ah, I already wondered when the "Quoting police" would come in. >>>> Peter: you're boring, a PITA, and this is usenet alt (still >>>> unmoderated), so either ignore the thread, or kill file me, but stop >>>> interefering with a discussion if you have nothing to add to it! >>> is yours an *argument* against mine? >> >> Just as much as yours is... and since you are *not* the moderator of >> acf... (fill in the dots) > > you are right: I'm NOT the moderator and would'nt be such one even if > this ng would be a moderated one. Beside wasting bandwidth etc. etc. in > case of much fullquoting again and again, often within minutely > responses, often additionally multi-x-posted, shorten the quotings is > not a rule but for some good reasons a common recommendation for a good > usenet behavior. And often you will find hundreds of fullquoting lines > where the poster only say "thanks". Fullquoting more than often only is > a pure lazyness(?). Ok, if you prefer fullquoting contrarely against the > common recommendation (see how to quote)...its really up to you. EOD. > I notice ya'll are snipping a bit? It's good advice...just don't be too parental about it. Sometimes it is also better to leave a good portion for reasons given. -- I research freeware http://bearbottoms1.com
From: In_Parentheses on 1 Sep 2006 19:24 Peter Seiler <psprivate(a)mailinator.com> wrote in news:44F8B746.4050400(a)mailinator.com: > In_Parentheses - 01.09.2006 15:34 : > >> Peter Seiler <psprivate(a)mailinator.com> wrote in >> news:44F808FC.1040100(a)mailinator.com: >> >>> In_Parentheses - 01.09.2006 12:01 : >>>> Ah, I already wondered when the "Quoting police" would come in. >>>> Peter: you're boring, a PITA, and this is usenet alt (still >>>> unmoderated), so either ignore the thread, or kill file me, but >>>> stop interefering with a discussion if you have nothing to add to >>>> it! >>> is yours an *argument* against mine? >> >> Just as much as yours is... and since you are *not* the moderator of >> acf... (fill in the dots) > > you are right: I'm NOT the moderator and would'nt be such one even if > this ng would be a moderated one. Beside wasting bandwidth etc. etc. > in case of much fullquoting again and again, often within minutely > responses, often additionally multi-x-posted, shorten the quotings is > not a rule but for some good reasons a common recommendation for a > good usenet behavior. And often you will find hundreds of fullquoting > lines where the poster only say "thanks". Fullquoting more than often > only is a pure lazyness(?). Ok, if you prefer fullquoting contrarely > against the common recommendation (see how to quote)...its really up > to you. EOD. > Peter, a good evening to you! Then I would suggest not to behave like one. One thing you cannot accuse me of is X-posting, neither do I send my posts to the server with hundreds of lines of the original messages quoted and just say "Thanks you", or any other "one-liner". So, EOD it is <By your command :)> -- Jay (IP)
From: Bear Bottoms on 1 Sep 2006 19:27
On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 18:00:32 -0500, Comodo <melih(a)comodogroup.com> wrote: Are you certain v2.3.4 will allow users to disable Launch Pad? -- I research freeware http://bearbottoms1.com |