From: krw on
On Tue, 18 May 2010 03:33:44 -0700, "JosephKK"<quiettechblue(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 16 May 2010 12:43:32 GMT, nico(a)puntnl.niks (Nico Coesel) wrote:
>
>>Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>Nico Coesel wrote:
>>>> Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Jim Thompson wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 15 May 2010 10:29:08 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Charlie E. wrote:
>>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>>>> IIRC, Jennic has a development kit and modules that are not too
>>>>>>>> expensive, like $500 for the dev kit...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hmm, no pricing on the site:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.jennic.com/products/modules/jn5148_modules
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But it's just bare modules. When designing I don't really need that and
>>>>>>> $500 just for home automation will raise a flag with SWMBO, just like a
>>>>>>> $500 handbag would with me :-)
>>>>>> Cheapskate! You mean your wife has no Coach purse?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Nope. We tend to use such monies in more useful ways. For example as a
>>>>
>>>> OTOH buying a bag helps a few kids in Asia to fill their bellies.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Sending money to an organization where you can be sure that >80% of
>>>donations make it to the recipients in the form of food and medication
>>>helps a lot more.
>>
>>IOW: Buy from Dealextreme.com instead of Mediamarkt, Wallmart, Fry's,
>>etc, etc.
>>
>>I don't know any organization that helps people efficiently. Over here
>>the anual door-to-door collection result is barely enough to pay the
>>director's salary.
>
>Director's salary ?????????? Big as the Red Cross are they?

That's when we stopped giving to the Red Cross, when we found out that Liz
Dole was pulling down $.5M. ...and forget the United Way; 100% waste.
From: krw on
On Tue, 18 May 2010 08:36:36 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> wrote:

>JosephKK wrote:
>> On Sat, 15 May 2010 16:06:57 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Nico Coesel wrote:
>>>> Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Jim Thompson wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 15 May 2010 10:29:08 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Charlie E. wrote:
>>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>>>> IIRC, Jennic has a development kit and modules that are not too
>>>>>>>> expensive, like $500 for the dev kit...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hmm, no pricing on the site:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.jennic.com/products/modules/jn5148_modules
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But it's just bare modules. When designing I don't really need that and
>>>>>>> $500 just for home automation will raise a flag with SWMBO, just like a
>>>>>>> $500 handbag would with me :-)
>>>>>> Cheapskate! You mean your wife has no Coach purse?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Nope. We tend to use such monies in more useful ways. For example as a
>>>> OTOH buying a bag helps a few kids in Asia to fill their bellies.
>>>>
>>> Sending money to an organization where you can be sure that >80% of
>>> donations make it to the recipients in the form of food and medication
>>> helps a lot more.
>>
>> I am a bit torn at that level. Propping up overpopulation (more than the
>> relevant economy can provide for) strikes me as an error, and poor
>> ethics.
>
>
>Sure, but you can't let the kids starve. We cannot punish them for the
>mistakes their parents and their countries made.

That's what makes it tough. The kids will be the next adults with nothing
solved.
From: Joerg on
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
> Joerg wrote:
>> Michael A. Terrell wrote:
>>> Joerg wrote:

[...]

>>>> The li'l 12V LAN drive I have is 500GB. They also have 1TB, 2TB and 4TB
>>>> versions at similar economic power intake but I don't need this much and
>>>> thus didn't want to spend the extra dough for something I'll never need.
>>>
>>> You're comparing apples & oranges. You have NAS, not a server.
>>>
>> What difference does it make in daily life? (other than that mine is
>> much more economical).
>
>
> All you have is a hard drive with an ethernet port. It's not a
> server. It can't take care of E-mail, newsgroups, FTP or host a
> website. It is barely a glorified 'USB memory stick' with a power cord.
> You can't plug a monitor or keyboard into it. There are hundreds of
> things it won't do. You can't drop in a sound card and use it to stream
> background music, or operate a mailing list. You can't run MFP
> software, or a database of customers, or a membership list for a non
> profit group.
>

My solution to that is very simple: I pay a company $80/year. For that
they keep my domain name registered and provide web/email/FTP and
whatever other service, 90% of which I never need or don't even know
what they are. All the rest is handled by this here PC and laptops.

I was never a fan of centralized "do it all" servers but prefer things
decentralized. If the server goes down your stuff stops and you must fix
it. When a PC coaked here a while ago I just hopped onto another one and
continued, then fixed the one with a broken HD when I got around to it.


> It isn't economical if it can't do what I need it to. Look at
> Apache, Joomla and other software needed for a modern server. Add
> Leafnode for a personal NNTP server and you can trap almost every speck
> of Spam. You can't do any of that with just an external hard drive with
> a crippled Linux install.
>

What would I need that stuff for anyhow?

[...]

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
From: Michael A. Terrell on

Joerg wrote:
>
> Michael A. Terrell wrote:
> > Joerg wrote:
> >> Michael A. Terrell wrote:
> >>> Joerg wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >>>> The li'l 12V LAN drive I have is 500GB. They also have 1TB, 2TB and 4TB
> >>>> versions at similar economic power intake but I don't need this much and
> >>>> thus didn't want to spend the extra dough for something I'll never need.
> >>>
> >>> You're comparing apples & oranges. You have NAS, not a server.
> >>>
> >> What difference does it make in daily life? (other than that mine is
> >> much more economical).
> >
> >
> > All you have is a hard drive with an ethernet port. It's not a
> > server. It can't take care of E-mail, newsgroups, FTP or host a
> > website. It is barely a glorified 'USB memory stick' with a power cord.
> > You can't plug a monitor or keyboard into it. There are hundreds of
> > things it won't do. You can't drop in a sound card and use it to stream
> > background music, or operate a mailing list. You can't run MFP
> > software, or a database of customers, or a membership list for a non
> > profit group.
> >
>
> My solution to that is very simple: I pay a company $80/year. For that
> they keep my domain name registered and provide web/email/FTP and
> whatever other service, 90% of which I never need or don't even know
> what they are. All the rest is handled by this here PC and laptops.


Simplify all you want, but you still haven't proved that a server is
an energy hog.


> I was never a fan of centralized "do it all" servers but prefer things
> decentralized. If the server goes down your stuff stops and you must fix
> it. When a PC coaked here a while ago I just hopped onto another one and
> continued, then fixed the one with a broken HD when I got around to it.
>
> > It isn't economical if it can't do what I need it to. Look at
> > Apache, Joomla and other software needed for a modern server. Add
> > Leafnode for a personal NNTP server and you can trap almost every speck
> > of Spam. You can't do any of that with just an external hard drive with
> > a crippled Linux install.
> >
>
> What would I need that stuff for anyhow?


I didn't say that you needed it, or even understand it. What you
have is the same as someone trying to use an 'Etch-A-Sketch to do CAD
work. It is absolutely useless for my needs. No mater how much hand
waving or bragging you do, you're using a 500 GB drive to back up your
work files. It may be low power, but don't depend on it for long term
use or you may lose a lot of important data.

--
Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to
have a DD214, and a honorable discharge.
From: Joerg on
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
> Joerg wrote:
>> Michael A. Terrell wrote:
>>> Joerg wrote:
>>>> Michael A. Terrell wrote:
>>>>> Joerg wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>>>>>> The li'l 12V LAN drive I have is 500GB. They also have 1TB, 2TB and 4TB
>>>>>> versions at similar economic power intake but I don't need this much and
>>>>>> thus didn't want to spend the extra dough for something I'll never need.
>>>>> You're comparing apples & oranges. You have NAS, not a server.
>>>>>
>>>> What difference does it make in daily life? (other than that mine is
>>>> much more economical).
>>>
>>> All you have is a hard drive with an ethernet port. It's not a
>>> server. It can't take care of E-mail, newsgroups, FTP or host a
>>> website. It is barely a glorified 'USB memory stick' with a power cord.
>>> You can't plug a monitor or keyboard into it. There are hundreds of
>>> things it won't do. You can't drop in a sound card and use it to stream
>>> background music, or operate a mailing list. You can't run MFP
>>> software, or a database of customers, or a membership list for a non
>>> profit group.
>>>
>> My solution to that is very simple: I pay a company $80/year. For that
>> they keep my domain name registered and provide web/email/FTP and
>> whatever other service, 90% of which I never need or don't even know
>> what they are. All the rest is handled by this here PC and laptops.
>
>
> Simplify all you want, but you still haven't proved that a server is
> an energy hog.
>

Lots of people have already done that, just look on the Interne. Like him:

http://mvolo.com/blogs/serverside/archive/2009/02/01/Analyzing-server-power-consumption-and-costs.aspx

Even the EPA has taken on the issue and there are reasons why "modern"
servers with EPA rating still come with a 460W supply:

http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/us/en/sm/WF25a/15351-15351-3328412-241644-241475-3884319.html

So, there.

>
>> I was never a fan of centralized "do it all" servers but prefer things
>> decentralized. If the server goes down your stuff stops and you must fix
>> it. When a PC coaked here a while ago I just hopped onto another one and
>> continued, then fixed the one with a broken HD when I got around to it.
>>
>>> It isn't economical if it can't do what I need it to. Look at
>>> Apache, Joomla and other software needed for a modern server. Add
>>> Leafnode for a personal NNTP server and you can trap almost every speck
>>> of Spam. You can't do any of that with just an external hard drive with
>>> a crippled Linux install.
>>>
>> What would I need that stuff for anyhow?
>
>
> I didn't say that you needed it, or even understand it. What you
> have is the same as someone trying to use an 'Etch-A-Sketch to do CAD
> work. It is absolutely useless for my needs. No mater how much hand
> waving or bragging you do, you're using a 500 GB drive to back up your
> work files. It may be low power, but don't depend on it for long term
> use or you may lose a lot of important data.
>

Hint: It ain't the drive that stuff gets backed up to, it's used for
collaboration. If it fails that is merely a minor inconvenience. And why
exactly should this be less dependable than a power-hog type server?

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.