Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: unsettled on 31 Jan 2007 20:31 MassiveProng wrote: > On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 02:44:10 -0600, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> > Gave us: > > >>MassiveProng wrote: >> >> >>>On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 22:02:30 -0600, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> >>>Gave us: >>> >>> >>> >>>>Text Medium No. 5 wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Hail Eris! On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:50:21 +0000, T Wake jabbered inanely: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>Our "British friends" are so brainwashed they not only don't realize >>>>>>>>they are, but they can no longer think for themselves any longer. The >>>>>>>>immediate kneejerk is to make the USA their whipping boy. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>And their counterparts across the English Channel are worse. I don't >>>>>>>expect them to do a damned thing about Iran's atomic bombs. They will >>>>>>>continue to hole meetings, eat lobster, swill champaign, until it's too >>>>>>>late...again. >>>>>> >>>>>>This is what we like to see. If you dont know what you are talking about >>>>>>throw in some insults and a bit of fear. >>>>>> >>>>>>Well done. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>"Iran's atomic bombs." As if. Wingnuts... >>>>> >>>> >>>>The Iranians are a good bit smarter than you are. >>> >>> >>> They had all their smarts handed to them. They would be nothing and >>>nowhere without outside assistance. >> >>A tinknocker would know. > > > > Interesting that once plowed under, this is all that surfaces. I > knew that was all you amounted to. > > You are the piece of tin I knocked, and you are corroding. I would > not even have to do anything, and you would still corrode away. We thought the great unwashed coming aboard usenet was bad. Till we started getting burnouts like you.
From: MassiveProng on 31 Jan 2007 20:42 On 31 Jan 2007 22:19:28 +0200, Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged(a)yahoo.co.uk> Gave us: >"T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> writes: >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >> Possibly. It's not clear since he talks like a tech. Most >> >> in this working category don't know how the rest of the >> >> company works. >> > >> > Good Lord ! >> > >> > You're startlingly ignorant of modern manufacturing. >> >> Three excess words there. > >I don't think anyone could ever call BAH startlingly modern. > Talk about understatements.
From: MassiveProng on 31 Jan 2007 21:04 On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 19:31:16 -0600, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> Gave us: >MassiveProng wrote: >> On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 02:44:10 -0600, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> >> Gave us: >> >> >>>MassiveProng wrote: >>> >>> >>>>On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 22:02:30 -0600, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> >>>>Gave us: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Text Medium No. 5 wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Hail Eris! On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:50:21 +0000, T Wake jabbered inanely: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Our "British friends" are so brainwashed they not only don't realize >>>>>>>>>they are, but they can no longer think for themselves any longer. The >>>>>>>>>immediate kneejerk is to make the USA their whipping boy. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>And their counterparts across the English Channel are worse. I don't >>>>>>>>expect them to do a damned thing about Iran's atomic bombs. They will >>>>>>>>continue to hole meetings, eat lobster, swill champaign, until it's too >>>>>>>>late...again. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>This is what we like to see. If you dont know what you are talking about >>>>>>>throw in some insults and a bit of fear. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Well done. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>"Iran's atomic bombs." As if. Wingnuts... >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>The Iranians are a good bit smarter than you are. >>>> >>>> >>>> They had all their smarts handed to them. They would be nothing and >>>>nowhere without outside assistance. >>> >>>A tinknocker would know. >> >> >> >> Interesting that once plowed under, this is all that surfaces. I >> knew that was all you amounted to. >> >> You are the piece of tin I knocked, and you are corroding. I would >> not even have to do anything, and you would still corrode away. > >We thought the great unwashed coming aboard usenet was bad. > >Till we started getting burnouts like you. I've accomplished more in the last two years than you likely will in your entire, pathetic life. I'll likely do the same this year. The stuff I work on is so cool I can't even tell you about it. Whereas your drab life is just... well... drab.
From: Ken Smith on 31 Jan 2007 21:58 In article <YJednaSdMaZaSV3YRVnytgA(a)pipex.net>, T Wake <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: [....] >Cubans don't count. "Uno, dos, tres" ain't no counting like I larned it. > > -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge
From: Ken Smith on 31 Jan 2007 22:14
In article <epq6o6$8qk_005(a)s856.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: [.....] >>But not sovereign immunity (or Nixon wouldn't have needed that pardon). > >Nixon didn't need the pardon; the United States of America >needed that pardon. You may not remember the villification >Ford received because he took away all chances of getting >revenge. The villification had a lot of justification behind it. The current story is that Ford did it so that the issue would be over and the country could get back to dealing with more serious issues. A lot of people thought at the time and many still believe that this was the wrong thing to do. If the trial had happened etc, people would have "seen justice done". People are a lot more willing to forgive someone who gets found guilty than someone who they see as having gotten special treatment. Nixon should have gone to jail over the 55MPH speed law and gotten 40 lashes for the "Nixonomics". > >/BAH -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge |