From: jmfbahciv on
In article <eef2s2l6gnqtqektdcp31p5lqe0h1edmeg(a)4ax.com>,
MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
>On Wed, 31 Jan 07 14:07:54 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us:
>
>>In article <cqrvr25071revcsdj1r31e9i7au4ui74j9(a)4ax.com>,
>> MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
>>>On Tue, 30 Jan 07 15:34:36 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us:
>>>
>>>>> You don't need an anechoic chamber btw.
>>>>
>>>>How do you measure the EMF in "noisy" environments?
>>>>Or don't you need numbers anymore?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> Device off, sensors read baseline noise reading.
>>>
>>> Device on, sensors read local differential. Extrapolations get
>>>made, figures get arrived at. Task complete.
>>
>>No wonder my stove doesn't work.
>>
>
> It is your brain that isn't working.

Most devices these days are in warm start mode. Instead
of measuring before and after power-on, the tests need
to measure before and after _plug-in_.

/BAH
From: jmfbahciv on
In article <45C0A791.7796AE43(a)hotmail.com>,
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
>
>> MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
>> > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us:
>> >
>> >>> You don't need an anechoic chamber btw.
>> >>
>> >>How do you measure the EMF in "noisy" environments?
>> >>Or don't you need numbers anymore?
>> >
>> > Device off, sensors read baseline noise reading.
>> >
>> > Device on, sensors read local differential. Extrapolations get
>> >made, figures get arrived at. Task complete.
>>
>> Your test has a big huge unfixable flaw.
>
>Perhaps you'd like to elaborate on that assertion ?
>

The device has to be unplugged to get the baseline reading.

/BAH
From: jmfbahciv on
In article <45BF7A40.71A37BB3(a)hotmail.com>,
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
>
>> kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote:
>> >Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>unsettled wrote:
>> >>> Eeyore wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> > Attacking Iran would really let the genie out of the bottle.
>> >>>
>> >>> Or contain it.
>> >>
>> >>It makes as much sense as attacking a wasp's nest with a heavy stick. In
>> >>front of other wasps !
>> >
>> >I'd say less. Iran will fall out of the hand of the extremists in the
>> >next 20 or so years if left alone. With Bush's help, they will maintain
>> >control for much longer than that.
>>
>> The West doesn't have 20 years.
>
>Says who apart from you?

Anybody who can think.
>
>
>> What part of "using an atom bomb in a few years" do you not understand?
>
>They don't have a bomb now nor will they have one in a 'few years'.
>
>Iran clearly wants one not for offensive use ( that would be insane )

Your assumption is 100% wrong. It will fatal to you.

> but to
>deter attack from the warmongering USA.

Even a two-year-olds know how to deter blame by
pointing their finger at somebody else.

/BAH
From: jmfbahciv on
In article <45BF7AF6.D38500D0(a)hotmail.com>,
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
>
>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >I just came across this recent example.
>>
>http://www.canada.com/topics/bodyandhealth/story.html?id=b2abf344-08e9-4ba6-8
>> >b5d-6d6da31ffeda
>> >
>> >" The combination of Jehovah's Witness parents and six tiny infants who
may
>> >need blood transfusions could push the Vancouver sextuplets into the
centre of
>> an
>> >emotional religious dispute, one that might even end up in court, experts
>> >suggested yesterday. "
>>
>> Boy, do I smell a rat. They had sextuplets without the services
>> of a fertility clinic?
>
>" The brief text states that church members are allowed to receive any modern
>medical intervention, except blood transfusions. "
>
>http://www.canada.com/topics/bodyandhealth/story.html?id=c41f53f6-f4ab-4a1f-9
66e-2881e55d6b50

Then they are inconsistent. There was a transfer of serum when
her doctor knocked her up.

/BAH
From: jmfbahciv on
In article <45BF7B63.396A1C67(a)hotmail.com>,
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
>
>> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote:
>> >"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >
>> >> Why is it that so many Americans seem to believe in perpetual motion
>> >> devices / free energy / cars that run on water btw ?
>> >
>> >Habishi isn't American.
>>
>> And he got his training in England.
>
>Do you have any evidence for this ?

He said so.

/BAH