Microwave brain scrambler?
in [Design]
|
From: Winston on 16 Mar 2010 19:31 On 3/16/2010 3:49 PM, Bill Sloman wrote: (...) > I think you are taking Dr. Adey's results a lot too seriously - his > explanation is (to put it kindly) unlikely to be the only explanation > that fits the data he presents. Very good. Thank you Bill. Resolved: >> Do you agree that Dr. Adey controlled the eye muscles of a lab >> animal only by stimulating it's brain with modulated non-ionizing >> radiation, as shown in Dr. Adey's paper? Dirk Bruere: No Bill Sloman: No Bill Beaty: No AZ Nomad: No JosephKK: No Steve: No Saved a lot of time and money there! Thanks everyone --Winston
From: Winston on 18 Mar 2010 00:49 On 3/11/2010 6:47 AM, Winston wrote: > Could you use amplitude modulated microwaves to disable a bad guy? > > Picture this: > A robber enters a restaurant, swings a pistol around and demands money. > > Secreted in the ceiling of the dining room is a microwave transmitter > equipped with a parabolic dish that can be aimed to cover any portion > of the eating area. (...) What *was* I thinking. It's clearly impossible. http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=elCiAAAAEBAJ&dq=US+2007/0249959 :) --Winston
From: Bill Sloman on 18 Mar 2010 07:48 On Mar 18, 5:49 am, Winston <Wins...(a)bigbrother.net> wrote: > On 3/11/2010 6:47 AM, Winston wrote: > > > Could you use amplitude modulated microwaves to disable a bad guy? > > > Picture this: > > A robber enters a restaurant, swings a pistol around and demands money. > > > Secreted in the ceiling of the dining room is a microwave transmitter > > equipped with a parabolic dish that can be aimed to cover any portion > > of the eating area. > > (...) > > What *was* I thinking. > > It's clearly impossible. > > http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=elCiAAAAEBAJ&dq=US+2007/0249959 There are plenty of nonsense patents in the system. The ban on patenting perpetual motion machines reflects the fact that they are a particularly popular with mad inventors, so the ban save the patent examiners a useful amont of time. -- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
From: Winston on 18 Mar 2010 10:07 On 3/18/2010 4:48 AM, Bill Sloman wrote: > On Mar 18, 5:49 am, Winston<Wins...(a)bigbrother.net> wrote: (...) >> It's clearly impossible. >> >> http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=elCiAAAAEBAJ&dq=US+2007/0249959 > > There are plenty of nonsense patents in the system. The ban on > patenting perpetual motion machines reflects the fact that they are a > particularly popular with mad inventors, so the ban save the patent > examiners a useful amont of time. The grantee had a couple DoD development contracts and demonstrated the device at the 2007 Navy Opportunity Forum at the Hyatt Regency in Crystal City Virginia. http://www.navysbirprogram.com/NavySearch/Award/award.aspx?pk=C18BA979-DADB-4892-896A-1E89970EA8BD http://www.fortliberty.org/us-navy-seeks-vomit-ray.html Not too many perpetual motion machines make it that far. :) Thanks, Bill. --Winston
From: Bill Sloman on 18 Mar 2010 18:23
On Mar 18, 3:07 pm, Winston <Wins...(a)bigbrother.net> wrote: > On 3/18/2010 4:48 AM,Bill Slomanwrote: > > > On Mar 18, 5:49 am, Winston<Wins...(a)bigbrother.net> wrote: > > (...) > > >> It's clearly impossible. > > >>http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=elCiAAAAEBAJ&dq=US+2007/0249959 > > > There are plenty of nonsense patents in the system. The ban on > > patenting perpetual motion machines reflects the fact that they are a > > particularly popular with mad inventors, so the ban save the patent > > examiners a useful amont of time. > > The grantee had a couple DoD development contracts and demonstrated the > device at the 2007 Navy Opportunity Forum at the Hyatt Regency in Crystal > City Virginia. > > http://www.navysbirprogram.com/NavySearch/Award/award.aspx?pk=C18BA97....http://www.fortliberty.org/us-navy-seeks-vomit-ray.html > > Not too many perpetual motion machines make it that far. :) The US military isn't too good at filtering out charlatans - they put time and money into telepathy and clairvoyance at one point. -- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen |