Microwave brain scrambler?
in [Design]
|
From: Winston on 15 Mar 2010 17:52 On 3/15/2010 12:04 PM, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote: > On 15/03/2010 14:44, Winston wrote: >> On 3/15/2010 1:43 AM, Bill Beaty wrote: (...) >>> You can argue forever about whether you've been blessed with five toes >>> or six, but immediate direct inspection goes far in silencing the >>> doubters. >> >> One step at a time. >> >> Do you agree that Dr. Adey controlled the eye muscles of a lab >> animal only by stimulating it's brain with modulated non-ionizing >> radiation, >> as shown in Dr. Adey's paper? > > As part of a trigger for a conditioned reflex. > The previous conditioning was the big "thing" I was not referring to the point of Dr. Adey's experiment at the time, but the more compelling aside regarding his control of the cat's eyes using modulated non-ionizing radiation. > He used an RF signal like Pavlov used a bell (or so the story goes). Pavlov used food as a reinforcing stimulus, linking it to the sound of a tuning fork. Let me ask you a completely different question: >> Do you agree that Dr. Adey controlled the eye muscles of a lab >> animal only by stimulating it's brain with modulated non-ionizing >> radiation, >> as shown in Dr. Adey's paper? 'Yes' or 'No' is all I ask for, guys. Thanks --Winston
From: Winston on 15 Mar 2010 17:58 On 3/15/2010 12:06 PM, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote: (...) > I can't hear magnetic fields either, but Persinger showed that mag > fields modulated with voice can result in choices, which should have > been random, being skewed towards the object of the modulated voice. Next we will be discussing opera. :) Let me ask a 'yes' / 'no' question: "By irradiating a lab animal with a non-ionizing carrier that has a low frequency AM subcarrier, Dr. Adey has taken over control the eye muscles of that lab animal, aiming them anywhere he pleases, any time he wants." Do you agree with that assessment, based on Dr. Adey's paper? Thanks --Winston
From: Michael A. Terrell on 15 Mar 2010 19:43 AZ Nomad wrote: > > I'd love to hear the explanation for 000 gauge cables snaking through > the ceiling and the megawatt power company feed for winston's infernal > machine. Sorry we had to lose the supply room for my equipment racks, > but isn't that better than pepper spray? A M-72 is smaller, cheaper and lighter. The only evidence lift behind is a thin piece of sheet metal, and a hole. ;-) -- Lead free solder is Belgium's version of 'Hold my beer and watch this!'
From: Dirk Bruere at NeoPax on 16 Mar 2010 01:20 On 15/03/2010 21:52, Winston wrote: > On 3/15/2010 12:04 PM, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote: >> On 15/03/2010 14:44, Winston wrote: >>> On 3/15/2010 1:43 AM, Bill Beaty wrote: > > (...) > >>>> You can argue forever about whether you've been blessed with five toes >>>> or six, but immediate direct inspection goes far in silencing the >>>> doubters. >>> >>> One step at a time. >>> >>> Do you agree that Dr. Adey controlled the eye muscles of a lab >>> animal only by stimulating it's brain with modulated non-ionizing >>> radiation, >>> as shown in Dr. Adey's paper? >> >> As part of a trigger for a conditioned reflex. >> The previous conditioning was the big "thing" > > I was not referring to the point of Dr. Adey's experiment at > the time, but the more compelling aside regarding his control > of the cat's eyes using modulated non-ionizing radiation. > >> He used an RF signal like Pavlov used a bell (or so the story goes). > > Pavlov used food as a reinforcing stimulus, linking it > to the sound of a tuning fork. > > Let me ask you a completely different question: > > >> Do you agree that Dr. Adey controlled the eye muscles of a lab > >> animal only by stimulating it's brain with modulated non-ionizing > >> radiation, > >> as shown in Dr. Adey's paper? > > 'Yes' or 'No' is all I ask for, guys. > > Thanks > > > --Winston Spend $100 and build one yourself. It's trivial. -- Dirk http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK http://www.blogtalkradio.com/onetribe - Occult Talk Show
From: Winston on 16 Mar 2010 01:38
On 3/15/2010 10:20 PM, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote: > On 15/03/2010 21:52, Winston wrote: (...) >> >> Do you agree that Dr. Adey controlled the eye muscles of a lab >> >> animal only by stimulating it's brain with modulated non-ionizing >> >> radiation, >> >> as shown in Dr. Adey's paper? >> >> 'Yes' or 'No' is all I ask for, guys. >> >> Thanks >> >> >> --Winston > > Spend $100 and build one yourself. > It's trivial. I'll take that as a 'no'. In that case, none of the findings I could generate would change your mind. Thank you for your thoughts on this subject. --Winston |