Microwave brain scrambler?
in [Design]
|
From: Winston on 15 Mar 2010 00:16 On 3/14/2010 5:18 PM, Paul Hovnanian P.E. wrote: > I prefer my brains over easy, not scrambled. Hear Hear! --Winston <-- Currently 'Sunny Side Up'
From: Winston on 15 Mar 2010 01:14 On 3/13/2010 10:12 PM, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote: (...) > Which says nothing about knocking out people or doing anything that > would have an immediate effect. (...) Then you will recall the following finding. By irradiating a lab animal with a non-ionizing carrier that has a low frequency AM subcarrier, Dr. Adey has taken over control the eye muscles of that lab animal, aiming them anywhere he pleases, any time he wants. Here is Dr. Adey's passage that I wildly extrapolated to reach my paraphrase: "...For example, if one presents a flash of light, the animal must make that [EEG] response within two seconds or be "punished." In this punishment the eyes are involuntarily deviated to the opposite side by stimulation of the brain itself. This is unpleasant but not painful." Dirk, is it such a great engineering stretch from that level of external brain control to the sort of overwhelming neural storm I have been discussing? Of course it isn't. The overwhelming neural storm is actually easier to create than the nuanced control of eye movement because one need not precisely mimic EEG waveforms in order to confuse the brain. Any random waveform as modulation is likely to create utter confusion so intense as to cause paralysis. Thank you for your attention to this important phenomenon. --Winston
From: Dirk Bruere at NeoPax on 15 Mar 2010 02:45 On 15/03/2010 00:07, Winston wrote: > On 3/14/2010 12:24 PM, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote: > > (...) > >> I should add that the symptoms are quite vague. >> A kind of fuzziness of thought. > > See one of my previous responses for an indication > of what symptoms are very likely to occur. > They are very specific. And the actual facts, as opposed to "likely to occur", tell a different story. You really think this has not been tried? Lots of times? -- Dirk http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK http://www.blogtalkradio.com/onetribe - Occult Talk Show
From: Dirk Bruere at NeoPax on 15 Mar 2010 02:49 On 15/03/2010 00:00, Winston wrote: > On 3/14/2010 11:58 AM, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote: >> On 14/03/2010 18:32, Winston wrote: >>> On 3/14/2010 9:35 AM, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote: >>>> On 14/03/2010 08:44, Winston wrote: >>> >>> (...) >>> >>>>> Adey demonstrated that modulated non-ionizing radiation can >>>>> replace legitimate interneural brain communication with >>>>> 'garbage input', likely to tax and confuse the unfortunate >>>>> owner of said brain. That is a key takeaway. >>>> >>>> Except it doesn't work in "real life" in any acute form. >>> >>> That depends on how you define the term 'acute'. >>> >>> The symptoms *will* occur instantly, for all intents. >> >> No. >> Hours to days. > > > Quoting Dr. Adey: > > "In animals and man EEG records tracings from deep brain structures > normally exhibit spontaneous rhythm patterns. These appear as bursts of > waves in different brain structures that last for two to three seconds. > Animals can be trained to make these bursts by reward or punishment. For > example, if one presents a flash of light, the animal must make that > response within two seconds or be "punished." In this punishment the > eyes are involuntarily deviated to the opposite side by stimulation of the > brain itself. This is unpleasant but not painful." > > Doesn't sound like hours or days to me, Dirk. And rhythmic sound, especially binaural tones, will entrain the gross brainwaves over both hemispheres. There's no instant knockout although it does lead to mild and controllable altered states of consciousness, easily overridden by the user. The RF version is far less effective at any frequency. -- Dirk http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK http://www.blogtalkradio.com/onetribe - Occult Talk Show
From: Dirk Bruere at NeoPax on 15 Mar 2010 02:54
On 15/03/2010 05:14, Winston wrote: > On 3/13/2010 10:12 PM, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote: > > (...) > >> Which says nothing about knocking out people or doing anything that >> would have an immediate effect. > > (...) > > Then you will recall the following finding. > > By irradiating a lab animal with a non-ionizing carrier that > has a low frequency AM subcarrier, Dr. Adey has taken over control > the eye muscles of that lab animal, aiming them anywhere he > pleases, any time he wants. > > Here is Dr. Adey's passage that I wildly extrapolated to reach my > paraphrase: > "...For example, if one presents a flash of light, the animal > must make that [EEG] response within two seconds or be "punished." > In this punishment the eyes are involuntarily deviated to the > opposite side by stimulation of the brain itself. > This is unpleasant but not painful." Conditioned response. Totally different from what you are talking about. > Dirk, is it such a great engineering stretch from that level > of external brain control to the sort of overwhelming neural > storm I have been discussing? Of course it isn't. Facts say otherwise. As I stated elsewhere, this has been tried by numerous people - and it doesn't work, > The overwhelming neural storm is actually easier to create > than the nuanced control of eye movement because one need not > precisely mimic EEG waveforms in order to confuse the brain. > Any random waveform as modulation is likely to create > utter confusion so intense as to cause paralysis. Yes, and if you want to do that you use high intensity light at around 18Hz which triggers an epileptic fit in a fair percentage of people. RF does not work. -- Dirk http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK http://www.blogtalkradio.com/onetribe - Occult Talk Show |