NEWS: Apple sued over hot iPad shutdowns
in [Wireless Internet]
|
Prev: NEWS: Security shortcomings in WPA2 that threaten security of wireless networks
Next: NEWS: Security shortcomings in WPA2 that threaten security ofwireless networks
From: Larry on 4 Aug 2010 12:18 John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote in news:l6ig569fjhpfb83o2t1jtsbnu1tq2bja45(a)4ax.com: >>> Apple fucked up another product, they are getting sued again. Deal >>> with it you Apple apologist. >> >>...and who ignored that other portable computing products have the same >>heat limitations. > > They do? Which ones? I've never had this kind of thermal issue with a > cell phone or an Acer netbook even in pretty harsh conditions. The > apologies here, starting with the "technical" nonsense posted by Steven, > are a sorry commentary on Apple engineering. > > Er, ah, actually the Apple Mac Air also has an overheating issue if used in a hot park out of doors for the same reason....glitz instead of cooling. -- iPhone 4 is to cellular technology what the Titanic is to cruise ships. Larry
From: John Navas on 4 Aug 2010 12:20 On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:57:26 -0400, in <V_WdnQvVrcx4EMTRnZ2dnUVZ_hKdnZ2d(a)earthlink.com>, Kurt Ullman <kurtullman(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >In article <p21j565np9a09puppdng9d461lqc70dqqp(a)4ax.com>, > John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 07:48:45 -0700, in > >> 1. I have no personal interest in the iPad because it does not fit my >> own needs (whether well engineered or not). >> >> 2. I started this thread only because it's a relevant item of interest. > > Yet pretty much every thread you start is about how something is >wrong with an Apple product. Nope. >Sorta argues against the personal interest >part. Being essentially an anti-fanboy, you have about the same amount >of credibility, at least to my mind. That you see it that way speaks volumes about your (lack of) perspective. -- John "Never argue with an idiot. He'll drag you down to his level and then beat you with experience." -Dr. Alan Zimmerman
From: John Navas on 4 Aug 2010 12:21 On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 09:03:21 -0700, in <alangbaker-9DD756.09032104082010(a)news.shawcable.com>, Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote: >In article <040820100857476252%nospam(a)nospam.invalid>, > nospam <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> wrote: > >> In article <g32j56le6lu0tusn9n0d63on22nbcan7ve(a)4ax.com>, John Navas >> <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: >> > Back into the kill filter you go. >> >> coward. > >Replied so that John can see. [shrug]
From: Larry on 4 Aug 2010 12:26 Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in news:alangbaker- 6692C3.12501303082010(a)news.shawcable.com: > Can you show that the iPad is actually *behaving* any differently than > other similar devices? > > Hell, that's easy! The "other similar devices" don't have class action lawsuits from angry customers against them for overheating! NEXT DEFLECTION! -- iPhone 4 is to cellular technology what the Titanic is to cruise ships. Larry
From: nospam on 4 Aug 2010 12:27
In article <Xns9DCA7D6E0ED59noonehomecom(a)74.209.131.13>, Larry <noone(a)home.com> wrote: > Er, ah, actually the Apple Mac Air also has an overheating issue if used in > a hot park out of doors for the same reason....glitz instead of cooling. actually, it doesn't. |