NEWS: Apple sued over hot iPad shutdowns
in [Wireless Internet]
|
Prev: NEWS: Security shortcomings in WPA2 that threaten security of wireless networks
Next: NEWS: Security shortcomings in WPA2 that threaten security ofwireless networks
From: Alan Baker on 4 Aug 2010 12:31 In article <Xns9DCA7EA6C9944noonehomecom(a)74.209.131.13>, Larry <noone(a)home.com> wrote: > Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in news:alangbaker- > 6692C3.12501303082010(a)news.shawcable.com: > > > Can you show that the iPad is actually *behaving* any differently than > > other similar devices? > > > > > > Hell, that's easy! The "other similar devices" don't have class action > lawsuits from angry customers against them for overheating! > > NEXT DEFLECTION! That's not actual evidence of the iPad behaving differently, Larry. That is evidence of *people* behaving differently. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Larry on 4 Aug 2010 12:30 John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote in news:ncug56ln3im23q6b2070608cpcd3ue53ui(a)4ax.com: > Don't be so defensive. > Apple fanboiz MUST be defensive. It's a requirement of being an Apple fanboi that no matter what the company does or screws up, the fanboi legion MUST defend the company with rationalizations and deflections even with their lives! It reminds one of the Jews defending Holocaust or Christians defending the Bible. It's more of a religious phenomenon, like these. I have this hilarious picture of legions of Toyota fanboiz standing arm-in- arm in front of the Toyota dealers with grim looks on their faces defending Toyota with their very lives against the recent spate of product recalls....(c;] How does Jobs get the company devotion to the level of a religion, no matter what? What a great psychological study for the marketing students at a major university to study! They could sell it to BP! -- iPhone 4 is to cellular technology what the Titanic is to cruise ships. Larry
From: Alan Baker on 4 Aug 2010 12:39 In article <040820100900396583%nospam(a)nospam.invalid>, nospam <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> wrote: > In article <313j56tbr3ghik2cfsff1b5b07l4d2dgmk(a)4ax.com>, John Navas > <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > > > >> 1. I have no personal interest in the iPad because it does not fit my > > >> own needs (whether well engineered or not). > > > > > >'I've never had this kind of thermal issue with a > > >cell phone or an Acer netbook even in pretty harsh conditions. The > > >apologies here, starting with the "technical" nonsense posted by Steven, > > >are a sorry commentary on Apple engineering.' > > > > > >That is taking a position. > > > > Indeed, but on the *apologies*, not on the engineering itself, > > on which I have no opinion. Does that help? > > no, because you said 'sorry commentary on apple engineering' so you > clearly *do* have an opinion, and a penchant for lying or being > incredibly obtuse. Yup. You can't believe an allegation of wrong doing is a "sorry commentary" on someone's character unless you believe in the allegation. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Larry on 4 Aug 2010 12:59 Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in news:alangbaker- 62E31D.09483504082010(a)news.shawcable.com: > All those prove is that a lawyer saw an opportunity to get a settlement. > > It is evidence of *human* behavior, not iPad behaviour. > > -- > Alan Baker > Vancouver, British Columbia > <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg> > > How much is Jobs paying you to defend the company? -- iPhone 4 is to cellular technology what the Titanic is to cruise ships. Larry
From: Alan Baker on 4 Aug 2010 13:03
In article <Xns9DCA845F55639noonehomecom(a)74.209.131.13>, Larry <noone(a)home.com> wrote: > Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in news:alangbaker- > 62E31D.09483504082010(a)news.shawcable.com: > > > All those prove is that a lawyer saw an opportunity to get a settlement. > > > > It is evidence of *human* behavior, not iPad behaviour. > > > > -- > > Alan Baker > > Vancouver, British Columbia > > <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg> > > > > > > How much is Jobs paying you to defend the company? How much are you being paid to malign it? Because whoever is doing it should get a refund. Referencing the same lawsuit over and over doesn't make it any more evidence of an actual problem. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg> |