Prev: NEWS: Security shortcomings in WPA2 that threaten security of wireless networks
Next: NEWS: Security shortcomings in WPA2 that threaten security ofwireless networks
From: Wes Groleau on 4 Aug 2010 19:49 On 08-04-2010 11:40, Alan Baker wrote: > The first refuge of the weak-minded. Call me weak-minded, not because I use a killfile, but because it took me this long to figure out Navas belongs there. -- Wes Groleau "There are more people worthy of blame than there is blame to go around."
From: Alan Baker on 4 Aug 2010 19:50 In article <i3cu9g$e29$3(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Wes Groleau <Groleau+news(a)FreeShell.org> wrote: > On 08-04-2010 11:40, Alan Baker wrote: > > The first refuge of the weak-minded. > > Call me weak-minded, not because I use a killfile, but > because it took me this long to figure out Navas belongs > there. That's why I said "first refuge". There are definitely people one should killfile. It just amuses me when I see it happening simply because someone is losing an argument. :-) -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Who Dat? on 4 Aug 2010 20:09 On 8/4/2010 7:49 PM, Wes Groleau wrote: > On 08-04-2010 11:40, Alan Baker wrote: >> The first refuge of the weak-minded. > > Call me weak-minded, not because I use a killfile, but > because it took me this long to figure out Navas belongs > there. > Doh!
From: Larry on 4 Aug 2010 20:31 Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in news:alangbaker- E22D8B.10035004082010(a)news.shawcable.com: >> How much is Jobs paying you to defend the company? > > How much are you being paid to malign it? Because whoever is doing it > should get a refund. Referencing the same lawsuit over and over doesn't > make it any more evidence of an actual problem. > > So, how much is Jobs paying you to defend the company? -- iPhone 4 is to cellular technology what the Titanic is to cruise ships. Larry
From: Larry on 4 Aug 2010 20:34
nospam <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> wrote in news:040820101024426041% nospam(a)nospam.invalid: > where are the thermal tests? how hot does it get? at what temperature > is the warning given? what *is* it's real world operating temperature > limits? > > oh right, you don't have any *actual* evidence, just more idiocy. > > I'm sure it will all be duly noted in the court records..... -- iPhone 4 is to cellular technology what the Titanic is to cruise ships. Larry |