NEWS: Apple sued over hot iPad shutdowns
in [Wireless Internet]
|
Prev: NEWS: Security shortcomings in WPA2 that threaten security of wireless networks
Next: NEWS: Security shortcomings in WPA2 that threaten security ofwireless networks
From: John Navas on 6 Aug 2010 13:44 On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 12:12:44 -0500, in <lloydparsons-8014E7.12124406082010(a)idisk.mac.com>, Lloyd Parsons <lloydparsons(a)mac.com> wrote: >In article <enao561t0lu8384i7ckhguul08bvt077j5(a)4ax.com>, > John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: >> I implied nothing -- my post speaks for itself, and was correct. >> >Your post was intended to give the impression that there are more >Android phones out there than iPhones, which is not the case at all. Nope. Read more carefully. >> >Go back a read a few of his posts concerning market share, revenue vs >> >profit and others for examples of his lack of basic business concepts. >> >> Which of those basic concepts do you not understand? > >I understand all of them, you OTOH, have shown a complete lack of >understanding. That's a shame as I'm retired while you are still trying >to run a business. Old saying in litigation: When you have the facts on your side, pound on the facts. When the law is on your side, pound on the law. When neither the law nor the facts are on your side, pound on the table (and your opponent). -- John "Never argue with an idiot. He'll drag you down to his level and then beat you with experience." -Dr. Alan Zimmerman
From: John Navas on 6 Aug 2010 13:45 On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 13:29:52 -0400, in <i3hgqs$mpk$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Wes Groleau <Groleau+news(a)FreeShell.org> wrote: >On 08-06-2010 09:50, -hh wrote: >> All I'm pointing out is that the numbers to date ... with the caveat >> of "the ones that I've seen" ... are only addressing the first half of >> the question. Where's the second half? > >Or maybe more than half. Other factors include but are not limited to >time-out period, number of retries, quality of noise filtering, presence >or absence of logic to re-establish connection, . . . All of which are irrelevant to the fundamental issue. -- John "Assumption is the mother of all screw ups." [Wethern�s Law of Suspended Judgement]
From: Lloyd Parsons on 6 Aug 2010 14:05 In article <pdio56tbnk81e6td4mgehn0b3dh98av1tg(a)4ax.com>, John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 12:12:44 -0500, in > <lloydparsons-8014E7.12124406082010(a)idisk.mac.com>, Lloyd Parsons > <lloydparsons(a)mac.com> wrote: > > >In article <enao561t0lu8384i7ckhguul08bvt077j5(a)4ax.com>, > > John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > > >> I implied nothing -- my post speaks for itself, and was correct. > >> > >Your post was intended to give the impression that there are more > >Android phones out there than iPhones, which is not the case at all. > > Nope. Read more carefully. > > >> >Go back a read a few of his posts concerning market share, revenue vs > >> >profit and others for examples of his lack of basic business concepts. > >> > >> Which of those basic concepts do you not understand? > > > >I understand all of them, you OTOH, have shown a complete lack of > >understanding. That's a shame as I'm retired while you are still trying > >to run a business. > > Old saying in litigation: > When you have the facts on your side, pound on the facts. > When the law is on your side, pound on the law. > When neither the law nor the facts are on your side, > pound on the table (and your opponent). You are either new here and haven't read Slade's previous postings, or incredibly naive in what you are willing to credit him with. -- Lloyd
From: Christopher A. Lee on 6 Aug 2010 14:06 On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 13:05:23 -0500, Lloyd Parsons <lloydparsons(a)mac.com> wrote: >In article <pdio56tbnk81e6td4mgehn0b3dh98av1tg(a)4ax.com>, > John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 12:12:44 -0500, in >> <lloydparsons-8014E7.12124406082010(a)idisk.mac.com>, Lloyd Parsons >> <lloydparsons(a)mac.com> wrote: >> >> >In article <enao561t0lu8384i7ckhguul08bvt077j5(a)4ax.com>, >> > John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: >> >> >> I implied nothing -- my post speaks for itself, and was correct. >> >> >> >Your post was intended to give the impression that there are more >> >Android phones out there than iPhones, which is not the case at all. >> >> Nope. Read more carefully. >> >> >> >Go back a read a few of his posts concerning market share, revenue vs >> >> >profit and others for examples of his lack of basic business concepts. >> >> >> >> Which of those basic concepts do you not understand? >> > >> >I understand all of them, you OTOH, have shown a complete lack of >> >understanding. That's a shame as I'm retired while you are still trying >> >to run a business. >> >> Old saying in litigation: >> When you have the facts on your side, pound on the facts. >> When the law is on your side, pound on the law. >> When neither the law nor the facts are on your side, >> pound on the table (and your opponent). > >You are either new here and haven't read Slade's previous postings, or >incredibly naive in what you are willing to credit him with. Or a troll.
From: John Navas on 6 Aug 2010 14:12
On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 13:05:23 -0500, in <lloydparsons-CEF564.13052306082010(a)idisk.mac.com>, Lloyd Parsons <lloydparsons(a)mac.com> wrote: >In article <pdio56tbnk81e6td4mgehn0b3dh98av1tg(a)4ax.com>, > John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 12:12:44 -0500, in >> <lloydparsons-8014E7.12124406082010(a)idisk.mac.com>, Lloyd Parsons >> <lloydparsons(a)mac.com> wrote: >> >> >In article <enao561t0lu8384i7ckhguul08bvt077j5(a)4ax.com>, >> > John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: >> >> >> I implied nothing -- my post speaks for itself, and was correct. >> >> >> >Your post was intended to give the impression that there are more >> >Android phones out there than iPhones, which is not the case at all. >> >> Nope. Read more carefully. >> >> >> >Go back a read a few of his posts concerning market share, revenue vs >> >> >profit and others for examples of his lack of basic business concepts. >> >> >> >> Which of those basic concepts do you not understand? >> > >> >I understand all of them, you OTOH, have shown a complete lack of >> >understanding. That's a shame as I'm retired while you are still trying >> >to run a business. >> >> Old saying in litigation: >> When you have the facts on your side, pound on the facts. >> When the law is on your side, pound on the law. >> When neither the law nor the facts are on your side, >> pound on the table (and your opponent). > >You are either new here and haven't read Slade's previous postings, or >incredibly naive in what you are willing to credit him with. What relevance does that have here? -- John "Assumption is the mother of all screw ups." [Wethern�s Law of Suspended Judgement] |