Prev: NEWS: Security shortcomings in WPA2 that threaten security of wireless networks
Next: NEWS: Security shortcomings in WPA2 that threaten security ofwireless networks
From: nospam on 5 Aug 2010 15:59 In article <7ill56tjqi01s3f9theq58ujb0frr06geg(a)4ax.com>, John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > >> Is it not possible that some of the dissatisfaction of AT&T by > >> iPhone owners is from antenna/dropped calls problems of the phone being > >> blamed on the operator? > > > >Not if it's from people who had AT&T prior to iPhone 4 > > > >They really do suck. > > In some places. Not in others. > No one carrier is great/best in all areas. most people don't use a cellphone in only one place. at&t has consistently ranked low, not just for coverage but for how they treat their customers. for instance, their bait & switch on the ipad unlimited plan. they knew months before its launch that they were going to move to a tiered plan, yet they announced and sold an unlimited plan for just a couple of weeks.
From: nospam on 5 Aug 2010 16:01 In article <lloydparsons-2C9285.10404005082010(a)idisk.mac.com>, Lloyd Parsons <lloydparsons(a)mac.com> wrote: > And for all the complaints about how good/bad AT&T is, > there has been much conjecture that if any other provider had been given > the iPhone exclusive, they would have had the same problems that AT&T > has had with the useage patterns. except that with the explosion of android phones, you don't see very many complaints about verizon, yet you still see complaints about at&t.
From: nospam on 5 Aug 2010 16:03 In article <qbrl56hqhtk2vn11uhjg2iuhh9jbq8cmmd(a)4ax.com>, John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > >Drivel: One thing I *REALLY* like about the iPhone 4 is the large > >number of used 3G and 3GS phones appearing on the used market. The 3G > >and 3GS are what the iPod Touch should have been, with a camera, GPS, > >and built in mic/spkr. My 3G makes a fairly good PDA with the phone > >turned off and using Wi-Fi. > > The annoying thing is that you have to activate it on AT&T before you > can use it as a fancy PDA/iPod. wrong.
From: Lloyd Parsons on 5 Aug 2010 16:04 In article <050820101301232886%nospam(a)nospam.invalid>, nospam <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> wrote: > In article <lloydparsons-2C9285.10404005082010(a)idisk.mac.com>, Lloyd > Parsons <lloydparsons(a)mac.com> wrote: > > > And for all the complaints about how good/bad AT&T is, > > there has been much conjecture that if any other provider had been given > > the iPhone exclusive, they would have had the same problems that AT&T > > has had with the useage patterns. > > except that with the explosion of android phones, you don't see very > many complaints about verizon, yet you still see complaints about at&t. In the grand scheme of things, that explosion is not a big one. The numbers are still pretty low. -- Lloyd
From: nospam on 5 Aug 2010 16:07
In article <lloydparsons-E4398D.15041505082010(a)idisk.mac.com>, Lloyd Parsons <lloydparsons(a)mac.com> wrote: > > > And for all the complaints about how good/bad AT&T is, > > > there has been much conjecture that if any other provider had been given > > > the iPhone exclusive, they would have had the same problems that AT&T > > > has had with the useage patterns. > > > > except that with the explosion of android phones, you don't see very > > many complaints about verizon, yet you still see complaints about at&t. > > In the grand scheme of things, that explosion is not a big one. The > numbers are still pretty low. although there are a lot more iphones than android devices, android is selling a *lot* of devices and there aren't very many problems on verizon, sprint or t-mobile. with the iphone, at&t had problems from day one. |