From: Mary on
"Burt" <sfbjgNOSPAM(a)pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:ful_f.57662$F_3.10939(a)newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
>
> "Mary" <nonon(a)nothin.com> wrote in message
> news:4439c2e4$0$28237$6d36acad(a)titian.nntpserver.com...
> > "Burt" <sfbjgNOSPAM(a)pacbell.net> wrote in message
> > news:eQj_f.57600$F_3.13545(a)newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
> >>
> >> "zakezuke" <zakezuke_us(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >
> > Do you mean the first time you are refilling after you buy new carts
> > from the store? The tri color carts from Staples compatibles or
Canons
> > don't have any plastic tape on them. They just have the hard orange
> > plastic clips that clip over the colors or black carts. There is no
> > tape. I can't remember about Epson carts if they had tape or not on
the
> > bottom where the color comes out after they were refilled. I think
they
> > did and were sealed in a small plastic bag.
> >
> > Mary
> >
> Are they plastic wrapped? You need to let air into the cart to permit
ink
> to come out. Otherwise you create a vacuum. At least that's the way
the
> bci-6 and bci-3 carts work.

We were talking about refilled carts and compatible carts so not sure
which ones you mean.
I can't remember if there was tape or not on the refilled ones. The
compatibles from STaples, do not have any plastic tape on the colors,
neither does the Canon ones.

> Yes, it would be convenient to have an extra
> set so you don't have to run to the store the minute one runs out. If
you
> are going to have a cart refilled when you have emptied it that is the
time
> you need to keep it from drying out. Do the refillers in your area
replace
> a cap on the bottom or plastic wrap the whole cart so the ink outlet
doesn't
> get dried out?

I think they had plastic around the whole cart, but its been a while, so
can't be sure.

Mary

From: Mary on
"Burt" <sfbjgNOSPAM(a)pacbell.net> wrote in message news:eQj_f.57600

> What I meant was to keep the empty carts you take out of the printer
in a
> sealed container (refrigerator plastic container with tight fitting
lid is
> OK) before taking them to your refiller. After refilling, the ink
outlet
> should be sealed and there should be some tape over the air vent on
top like
> when you buy a new one. I've never used the tricolor cart, but the
bci-6
> and bci-3ebk carts have tape you remove and other plastic tape you
leave on
> the top. After refilling I put some tape over the air vent until I'ml
ready
> to use it and I then take only the tape off just as I would for a new
OEM
> cart.

the bci 3ebk carts are for the ip4000 arent they? I wish they wouldn't
number the carts like that as they are hard to remember. they should
just put the model number of the printer on the box (for compatibles or
other) and you could find them much quicker. I spent ages going back and
forth last week trying to figure out which printer used which carts as I
didn't know the cartridge numbers for the printers I was looking at. Its
a pain.
with the ip1500, whether compatibles or brand name none have plastic
tape over the air vent.
but maybe they do on newer models.

Mary

From: Mary on
"Burt" <sfbjgNOSPAM(a)pacbell.net> wrote in message news:03g_f.14379

> Mary - You asked, on a previous post, about the large black bci-3ebk
tank.
> It is actually a benefit as it prints better text and has a large
capacity
> which means less trips to get refilled, etc.

I think I asked you but forget, that being the case above, why wouldn't
they just have one small black cartridge like other printers? Is the
ink different? I would think the small one would print good enough. Is
it a way for Canon to make more money for more carts in the same
printer?

Mary

From: Mary on
"zakezuke" <zakezuke_us(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message

To get back to this for a minute:

> > > MPUSBPRN01 refers to the virtual port your printer is on, for
example
> > > if you had two printers of the same type one would be MPUSBPRN01
and
> > > the other would be MPUSBPRN02. When you do a file print look for
> > > "where" and which ever printer spews out paper is that one.

> > I've only got one printer and its USB01.

I was thinking later that my Epson Bjc 2100 was USB01 before when I had
it installed, but when I got the ip1500, it installed on MPUSBPRN01, and
though I don't have the BJC2100 installed now or connected to the
computer, the ip1500 still used MPUSBPRN01. Where does it get MP?
Regardless, the ip1500 has been assigned to MPUSBPRN01 and is accepted
as that on the utility, but other buttons pressed does not reset.

> You got me there... I would expect something like IPUSBPRN01 as in
> Canon pixma IP series usb printer number one, not Canon MP series usb
> printer number one.... but often canon uses the same roms between
> printers. Somewhere inside the printer it probally says "I'm
MPUSBPRN"

It must.

> > Then you click on Quit to Exit,
> > but I wonder if you only know it worked if the error message doesn't
> > come on the screen next time or if its set right, there is some
> > confirmation message.
>
> Got me... I have not used this software. The manual... likely the
> service manual... would actually spell it out for ya. Problem is I
> only have the ip4000 service manual which doesn't employ the "service
> tool" but rather oddball button presses.

The ones you or was it Burt gave me before for pressing buttons on the
printer. I only have two buttons on the ip1500. power on and the Resume
so a couple of things mentioned did not make sense, saying turn on the
printer when it was already turned on, so I didn't get anywhere with my
reset with that method either. Oh well, maybe means my printer can't be
reset for some reason.

Mary

From: zakezuke on
> So you don't think the ip4000 uses as much ink as the Epson C64 I had? I
> thought it used a ton of ink and I didn't print photos at that time as I
> didn't have a digital camera. I would much rather have the ip15000 I now
> have than the Epson.

There is NO way the ip4000 will use as much ink as the Epson. The
Epsons are on piezo technology which employs crystals which expand and
contract and vibrate, and though the assistance of gravity drop on the
page in the right spot. From my understanding this requires a larger
shaft and is more prone to clogging. The result is a complex pump
system to suck the ink right out of the heads to clean them. The Canon
is on thermal technology, basicly a coil in a chamber when heated.
>From my understanding not only is the shaft smaller, but because we are
dealing with an expanding gas even if it does clog, there is less clog
and more force to get rid of the clog.

Technicaly piezo jets are where it's at as you don't have to worry so
much about chemistry... you can put just about anything through them
including molten wax.. but the base line epsons are flacky.

Even if you were to take one cartridge and refill it, the cleaning
cycle will be leaner on the ip4000. I can't speak for the newer one
yet as i've only owned the ip5200 for about a week and haven't printed
much with it yet.

> You mean that HP's use more ink than the ip1500. Maybe some of Hp
> printers don't take too much ink?

The newer hps that take inktanks, which IIRC is out of your budget,
from my understanding have an improved cleaning system which circulates
the ink rather than just tossing in a diaper. The head on the cart
style don't need to be cleaned so much as you're going to toss them
anyway. But the problem with the cheaper HPs isn't ink efficency, it's
tiny cartridges that cost a whole lot more than the ip1500... simply
put you might be better off with the ip1600 but i'd have to crunch the
numbers and see.

> It is a better idea if they are clear and you can see when the ink goes
> down and get a shock :) - but its just as much a shock as looking at the picture on
> the screen of the how much ink is left.

Well, at least looking at the tanks you "know' how much is left. In
the case of Epson it's totally an estimate. The ip4000 at the very
least uses a prism that alerts you when it's down to 20%, and you know
full well you have 20% left. There isn't a meter that give you scaled
levels. The ip4200 does but this would be disabled if you refill
manualy. I have no more data yet on this series... only had one for a
week.

> From my point of view, their carts seem to be expensive. They don't have
> as many compatibles as Canon and most seem to have an integrated
> printhead and cart, which costs more right there.
> Doesn't the 4200 have the same kind of printhead and cart? that cost
> more to buy carts because of the new printhead every time.

The ip4200 is basicly the same thing as the ip4000 as far as the carts
go, same as your ip1500 except bigger and it takes 5 tanks, clear
simple tupperware... except they include chips which keep track of how
much ink you used. When empty it warns you three times or so before
giving you a warning "proceed at you own risk". Then it disables the
meter. There are no compatable tanks for this yet, but you can refill
the existing tanks... mail order or that fill as you wait place. What
I don't know is if you disable the meter if the prism still works... I
have not had the printer long enough.

Again, there is plenty of ink for the ip4200 but no cartridges due to
the chips. Like epson I expect there will be eventually.

> I've never used an HP so can't comment. I wouldn't mind considering an
> HP, but the carts seem to be more expensive than Canons. Didn't you or
> Burt say that the Canon 4200 has no compatibles. You have to buy brand
> name?

No compatable tanks, refilling your tanks is OK... which is rather why
we both were pushing the ip4000. It has compatable inks and tanks up
the yazoo. You will not be inkless in Toronto... where as I with my
ip5200 am inkless in seattle.

> I notice the 4200 is much the same price as
> the 4000 in Staples. I thought I saw the 4200 on sale not long ago, but
> it kind of puts me off the printhead and cart in one makes cartridges
> more money, and no compatibles and may never be.

the ip4200 is like your ip1600 in the fact you can remove the head...
and if it fails canon will send you a new one during the one year
warranty period. You just can't buy aftermarket ink at Staples *yet*.
The *only* issue is the chip on the cartridge, otherwise refilling what
you have isn't a problem, either your self or a fill as you wait or
mail order refill place. The ip4000 has NO such restriction but isn't
made and is in short supply. If you want compatables at Staples the
ip4000 is *the* choice. The only thing you don't seem to like about it
is the fact it takes multi-tanks rather than a tri color. You'd be
better off pricewise with the ip4000, or your existing ip1500. It's
not "as" good but it's better than most printers under $100.

> Nothing wrong with asking them to price match

When I can check online what the prices are...I find it pointless. For
example I was pricing a new hard drive today. Basicly I want to redo
my server and it's ever so much easier with a new drive. I had my
choice with the local big name stores which offered good prices with
rebates, a few no name brands, or an independent shop. The indy shop
won in terms of out of pocket price, which all things being equal I
pick the indy shop though it's a 10 mile drive. Also the big name
stores try to offer the extended warranty on product which carry a very
good 3 to 5 year warranty. In this case there wouldn't be an option
for pricematching as the indy shop offers OEM products... as in
boxless. And they don't haggle. Even if I could play the price match
game... that would take time I could otherwise be spending using my
product.

> Its not a booth. Its just a screen you stand in front of. I think of a
> booth like a booth in some older restaurants, or one of these old photo
> booths - enclosures.

Ah like a phone booth, which is rather why I call them Photo Stations.

"What is "London Drugs Photo Station"?
London Drugs Photo Station (LDPS) is a suite of digital imaging
services, part of the high quality photo finishing available through
the One Hour Photo Division of London Drugs Limited. In reading this
FAQ web page you have already accessed the Internet portion of London
Drugs Photo Station, at ldphotostation.com. Features available on this
web site include the following:"

It would seem the Canadian term is "Photo Station", or at least the
london drugs term.

> Well, if you are going to Costco that would be correct. Otherwise, here
> you would say I am going to the print machine at Walmart or wherever.
> I've never said that because I've never done it yet.

When you do...

> I already asked you where you were from. I was thinking you were Burt
> and was going to ask him where he was from. Do you go to Merida Mexico?
> Well North America is Canada, US and Mexico.

Well "I" agree with you, but for some reason the people live down south
think of mexico as central america for some reason. I know it's
silly... but the term for English speaking neighbor is "north
american".

> You mean you can buy printers for $20.00 or $40.00?
> You wouldn't be able to do that here. Cheapest would be $60.00 Can. and
> that would be on sale. Most start at $70.00 for cheapest printers. The
> only one I've seen is that HP one for $50.00 (the HP 3845). I've never
> seen it in stores for a long time. Its Staples online, but I don't know
> if its any good or not.

I mean... the ink in the printer costs about $60ish to $80ish... and
the printer it self costs $100ish to $120ish, making the spent on the
printer $20 to $40 or so.

The HP 3845 will print probally about as much as the ip1500 did. about
220 pages black. It'll cost you $30ish canadian to do it. or
13cents/page. The ip1500 was about $10ish for 150page, or about
6cents/page, and fact that you can get aftermarket supplies for the
ip1500, lowering your cost per page to well about a penny or two a
page. To compair the ip4000 was about 3cents/page for the name brand
ink, or about a couple pennies a page for the aftermarket staples
supplies. 3cents canadian a page is damn good, less is even beter.
Unless you can find someone to refill the HP it'll cost 5 to 10 times
as much to operate.

HP 3845, thimble class, massive price.

> The Canon Bjc 2100 was a very well made printer and was cheap - $70.00 I
> think and lasted 3 years. It printed well but I only printed a few
> scanned photos from my old camera.

The bjc-2100 wasn't so bad, but that was then... I wouldn't expect the
ip1500 to outlast a bjc-2100. I don't know about the ip1600 as it's
just too new but if you want a printer that'll last for 3 years...
think $100 plus or minus a few bucks and careful research.

> I wish I lived next door to you and you could have given it to me :)

Actually staples,ca had the ip4000 for CDN$80... not as cool as US $65
and a $20 rebate. At least Canada still has the ip4000, they are rare
suckers in the states.

> Staples warranty is $10.00 if you buy something under $100.00. If its
> over that but up to $200.00 it doubles to $20.00. It goes up the more
> the item cost. Up to $200.00 is replacement, over that is repair. The
> ip1500 cost me $70.00 and was on sale for $10.00 off original price.

Ok, so I can assume your printer represents $70 from staples? The head
represents $40ish on e-bay assuming you don't use it.

> If I bought a printer for $130.00, it would cost me $60.00 more to pay
> for the printer and $20.00 for the Staples warranty. Thats quite a lot
> of money for me. I don't have a lot of money ya know :)

Ok, so $150 if you get the staples warranty. And $70 from staples, and
you should be able to sell the head for $40, and do someone a favor at
that. That brings you up to $110 or $40 less than the ip4000. You
could also sell the ink and get aftermarket but that's too complex to
calculate.

Or.. you can get your ip1500 replaced from canon and I presume ditch
the Staples warranty. It'll probally last a year, and the aftermarket
supplies to make it reasonable to operate.