Can Christian Electronic Designers Design?
in [Design]
|
From: RogerN on 20 Apr 2010 22:29 "D from BC" <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote in message news:MPG.2637f07b21b045c79897e7(a)209.197.12.12... > In article <xcCdnaAV2ZFXsVPWnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d(a)earthlink.com>, > regor(a)midwest.net says... >> Maybe you will take comfort in the fact that Atheist are winning, the >> National day of Prayer has been declared unconstitutional. >> >> RogerN >> > > National day of Prayer is a trojan. > Looks harmless but it's aim is to promote, strengthen, convert, > indoctrinate, increase social division and create unfairness to other > religions or lack of religion and makes a government seem theocratic. > > National prayer day makes the hint that Christian ideas don't sell > themselves. > Christianity has to be pumped up by national days, super churches and > evangelists and weekly visits to church.. > It's like there's a problem believing in this stuff. > > There will never be a national atheist day. > The atheists don't want a national atheist day. > A National atheists day is silly like a YOu're-Not-A-Dentist Day. > > Special days have to stop.. Everyday with be a special day and then > special days will be replaced by other special days. > Fathers day. Mothers day. Daughter day? Son day? Auntie day? 1st cousin > day? > > > -- > D from BC > British Columbia It's not a national Christian prayer day, it's national prayer day. It wasn't considered unconstitutional in 1975, or when Washington called for it in 1795, or any other time in the history of the United States until some libtarded woman judge decided it was unconstitutional in 2010. What does it mean that the same founding father that penned the very words "separation of church and state" attended church services in a government building, gave money to missionaries, and had a military band play in the church service? It means that libtards are changing the meaning to mean what it never meant. The constitutional words are missing, separation of church and state isn't in the constitution. Libtards have taken the words that congress shall make no law concerning the establishment of religion, and changed it to separation of church and state. It's all about making something mean what it never meant to push the libtard agenda. RogerN
From: Jon Kirwan on 20 Apr 2010 22:32 On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:54:27 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote: >In article <ig2ss551inmdqnvtlbv6cu4rrp2p3pmb0q(a)4ax.com>, >jonk(a)infinitefactors.org says... >> >> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:51:40 -0500, "RogerN" >> <regor(a)midwest.net> wrote: >> >> ><snip> >> >On Earth there are good places to live and bad places to live, some have it >> >pretty good here on Earth while others are not so fortunate. >> >> In other words, one cannot tell there are Christians here at >> all. When Jesus was around, he was basically preaching to >> give away all you own to the poor and follow him. At that >> time, there were no Christians at all and the religious > >JF would probably say that Jesus was being figurative (An exaggeration. >One can go to the extreme of giving everything away.) >However an exaggeration is a form of lying. I think Jesus was pretty explicit. He was asked, he answered. He then used the situation as a parable, as well, about the likelihood of people who own stuff to get into heaven. He's not equivocal about it. >If I gave all my stuff to you and you gave all your stuff to me and then >I gave all your stuff to somebody else then everybody will end up with >all the wrong stuff! hehe. Ah, but he said to sell it and give the proceeds to the poor, not just give the stuff away! (Matthew 19:21..) Ah, what a world we'd have if there actually _were_ a billion Christians on the planet. Sadly, there are probably about 5. Or less. >> leaders had a great deal of perks (like being able to eat >> from the fields on Sunday, for example) and this was a "new >> idea." Today, religious leaders still drive around in >> expensive, chauffeured cars and live in personal comfort and >> wealth, and no one much gives away everything they have to >> the poor to follow Jesus. The only difference is that there >> is a world full of people calling themselves Christians today >> and there were roughly zero back then. Nothing has changed, >> though. You can't tell there is any difference at all, for >> all the CINOs "Christians in name only" that exist now. >> >> >Couldn't Hell be similar as far as worse and better areas? >> >> Couldn't Valhalla be similar as far as worse and better >> areas? What about samsara from some Buddhist traditions? >> Might they be similar as far as worse and better areas? >> >> Don't you see this for the sheer argument from ignorance and >> projection that it is? >> >> Jon > >If Christians are making up better fit delusions at least they're >making an effort in the right direction. Not sure what to say to that. hehe. Jon
From: Jon Kirwan on 20 Apr 2010 22:39 On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 21:29:18 -0500, "RogerN" <regor(a)midwest.net> wrote: >It's not a national Christian prayer day, it's national prayer day. It >wasn't considered unconstitutional in 1975, or when Washington called for it >in 1795, or any other time in the history of the United States until some >libtarded woman judge decided it was unconstitutional in 2010. ><snip> Go read the decision before spouting off, ignorantly. http://www.wiwd.uscourts.gov/assets/pdf/FFRF_v_Obama_Order.pdf Jon
From: Beryl on 21 Apr 2010 00:11 D from BC wrote: > In article <xcCdnaAV2ZFXsVPWnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d(a)earthlink.com>, > regor(a)midwest.net says... >> Maybe you will take comfort in the fact that Atheist are winning, the >> National day of Prayer has been declared unconstitutional. >> >> RogerN >> > > National day of Prayer is a trojan. > Looks harmless but it's aim is to promote, strengthen, convert, > indoctrinate, increase social division and create unfairness to other > religions or lack of religion and makes a government seem theocratic. > > National prayer day makes the hint that Christian ideas don't sell > themselves. > Christianity has to be pumped up by national days, super churches and > evangelists and weekly visits to church.. > It's like there's a problem believing in this stuff. > > There will never be a national atheist day. > The atheists don't want a national atheist day. > A National atheists day is silly like a YOu're-Not-A-Dentist Day. > > Special days have to stop.. Everyday with be a special day and then > special days will be replaced by other special days. > Fathers day. Mothers day. Daughter day? Son day? Auntie day? 1st cousin > day? Nevertheless, Sunday, April 25 *is* World Penguin Day.
From: D from BC on 22 Apr 2010 20:41
In article <qPCdnbj85o5HWk3WnZ2dnUVZ_q6dnZ2d(a)earthlink.com>, regor(a)midwest.net says... > I'm amazed that you can get so much wrong. If you were an electronics > designer, you would probably still be stuck on power supplies. Oops, sorry! > If anyone could get to Heaven the old testament way, by following the law, > then they would be superior to me, because I sure couldn't. A Christian is > such a pathetic person that they don't deserve to go to Heaven, they get It's not important where Christians go. > there by riding in on the coat tail of Jesus. I guess you overlooked that > information? Quite frankly, if I were an Atheist I would be much better at > it than you. But then again, you are kind of like a rocket scientist that > is working up to Estes level 2 (but failing miserably) :-) > > RogerN > |