Can Christian Electronic Designers Design?
in [Design]
|
From: D from BC on 22 Apr 2010 15:51 In article <dtovs5tomhjhbeqvvv8bnofjfm3tncnn9b(a)4ax.com>, jonk(a)infinitefactors.org says... > Let him first read the decision. Until then, there is > nothing to say to him about this decision and his violent, > cruel, ignorant name-calling. It's just a child ranting and > being stupidly stubborn about being uninformed and uncaring > about others, besides. > > Jon > God is collecting people with a puny brain thought that would fit on a pin head. The puny brain thought is believing in Jesus. God doesn't have value for brains without the Jesus neural pattern. Christians track what God values. Brains that have the Jesus neural pattern are valuable to God. Christians feel more valuable to a God. It creates a sense of superiority. Feeling superior over nonbelievers/other religions can result in racism and unethical behavior. Some Christians discriminate and judge people by the colour of their mind. Or... Perhaps RogerN is just doing a 'Don't take away my Santa Clause!' freak out. :P
From: RogerN on 22 Apr 2010 18:04 "D from BC" <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote in message news:MPG.263a48afe31599e09897f1(a)209.197.12.12... > In article <dtovs5tomhjhbeqvvv8bnofjfm3tncnn9b(a)4ax.com>, > jonk(a)infinitefactors.org says... >> Let him first read the decision. Until then, there is >> nothing to say to him about this decision and his violent, >> cruel, ignorant name-calling. It's just a child ranting and >> being stupidly stubborn about being uninformed and uncaring >> about others, besides. >> >> Jon >> > > God is collecting people with a puny brain thought that would fit on a > pin head. > The puny brain thought is believing in Jesus. > God doesn't have value for brains without the Jesus neural pattern. > Christians track what God values. > Brains that have the Jesus neural pattern are valuable to God. > Christians feel more valuable to a God. > It creates a sense of superiority. > Feeling superior over nonbelievers/other religions can result in racism > and unethical behavior. > Some Christians discriminate and judge people by the colour of their > mind. > > Or... > Perhaps RogerN is just doing a 'Don't take away my Santa Clause!' freak > out. :P > I'm amazed that you can get so much wrong. If you were an electronics designer, you would probably still be stuck on power supplies. Oops, sorry! If anyone could get to Heaven the old testament way, by following the law, then they would be superior to me, because I sure couldn't. A Christian is such a pathetic person that they don't deserve to go to Heaven, they get there by riding in on the coat tail of Jesus. I guess you overlooked that information? Quite frankly, if I were an Atheist I would be much better at it than you. But then again, you are kind of like a rocket scientist that is working up to Estes level 2 (but failing miserably) :-) RogerN
From: RogerN on 22 Apr 2010 18:57 "D from BC" <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote in message news:MPG.263965f95782b97b9897ee(a)209.197.12.12... > In article <JoSdnRkYCMTAKFLWnZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d(a)earthlink.com>, > regor(a)midwest.net says... >> >> "D from BC" <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote in message >> news:MPG.263936dcd75e41929897eb(a)209.197.12.12... >> > In article <plqus5d82erhcvjojrbtc70d31qb5a602a(a)4ax.com>, >> > jfields(a)austininstruments.com says... >> >> >Even if true, God is ridiculous by doing nothing. >> >> >> >> --- >> >> Tou have no clue what God is or isn't doing, and it's _you_ who's >> >> ridiculous in expecting God to live up to _your_ expectations. >> >> >> > >> > The bible has God doing lots of things in the bible. >> > Now God does nothing.. That's a strange change. >> > Perhaps it's the presence of HD camcorders and digital cameras and cell >> > phone cameras. >> > There's more evidence that God does nothing compared to evidence that >> > God does something. >> > >> > Prayer doesn't work especially for zero probability events. >> > There's been no recent defiances of physics such burning bushes, parted >> > seas and killing of 1st born. >> > No amputees have had their legs or arms grow back. >> > >> > Christian engineers are ridiculous in naming what's unknown as God. >> > >> > >> > -- >> > D from BC >> > British Columbia >> > >> >> At least you're consistent, consistently wrong! > > Recovering from cancer is not a zero probability event. > Some people do recover. > If you are diagnosed with pancreatic cancer you have a 90% chance of > dieing within 5 years. > A zero probability event is amputees growing legs and arms back. > God is most qualified to do a zero probability event. > Nowhere in modern medical history has anyone grown arms or legs back. > >> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATFfZkIkrq8&feature=related >> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kH1SlSB9uH8&feature=related >> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXrZO_S-4hU&feature=related >> >> >> >> RogerN > > Cancer recovery videos are not as impressive as arms and legs growing > back. > AFAIK.. Some people can loose arms and legs due to cancer. > Where are the videos of arms and legs growing back? > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npT5WHhXuCU > There's no following video where she has a new leg. > > Christian engineers are ridiculous to think that if they lost a > leg/arm/eye, God could make it grow back. > > > -- > D from BC > British Columbia Are you wrong yet again? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97Ivech0RVc :-)
From: Jon Kirwan on 23 Apr 2010 04:56 Roger, when you say that you've read the judge's decision, we'll talk about it. Until then, I'm not interested. There is a lot of detail in the 66 page decision that needs to be addressed between us and there is no point talking until you've brought yourself up to speed on at least that much. Calling her names isn't the right way to deal with this. Dealing with her points would be interesting to me. Repeating your opinion before informing yourself and addressing your opinions to her statements, or calling her names (or others) isn't interesting to me. Jon
From: Jon Kirwan on 23 Apr 2010 04:59
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 05:58:12 -0500, "RogerN" <regor(a)midwest.net> wrote: ><snip> >I intend to read the Judges decision as time allows, but it takes me some >time to read 60 pages, I'm not a speed reader and find much of what was read >to be uninteresting. I find reading tax law uniquely uninteresting. Yet I have to do it to deal with what the IRS says about tax law. You may not agree with her, you may feel what she says is simply wrong and therefore not terribly enlightening to you, but regardless of all that she does discuss issues you will have to deal with in talking this over with me. I'll wait. Jon |