From: RogerN on

"D from BC" <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.2654fe1584d6336b989834(a)209.197.12.12...
> In article <FM6dnaGo-pQQmXfWnZ2dnUVZ_jCdnZ2d(a)earthlink.com>,
> regor(a)midwest.net says...
>> > God is father.
>> > Jesus = God
>> > So
>> > Jesus = father
>> > God = Holy Spirit
>> > So
>> > Holy Spirit = father
>> > Therefore 3 fathers.
>> > But not possible due Christianity using illogic.
>> > The magical illogic of the trinity.
>> > http://christianityinview.com/images/trinity.gif
>>
>> One God in 3 persons, you think that's incredible look up a 4 in 1
>> screwdriver, a boy scout knife would send you over the edge!
>>
>
> The trinity as seen on
> http://christianityinview.com/images/trinity.gif
> violates the law of identity.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_identity
>
> A multitool is not a good example to explain the illogical trinity as
> seen on http://christianityinview.com/images/trinity.gif
>
> Each tool from a multitool tool is used one at a time.
> God doesn't morph from one form to another.
> God is all things at the same time.
> If God morphed then Jesus wouldn't be the son of God but instead would
> be called God.
> Unless son is figurative for a humanoid God. The bible is figurative
> whenever something needs to make sense.
>
> A better example for the trinity is a muppet operator.
> The operator is God and God has a muppet on each hand.
> Jesus = Kermit the frog
> Holy spirit = Miss Piggy
> God is being 3 things and all can be considered one thing.
> It's a trinity.
>
> Christian engineers are ridiculous to believe in God's muppet show.
> Kermit got nailed and Miss Piggy sprinkles fairy dust on people.
>
> --
> D from BC
> British Columbia

Ok, what about 3in1 oil?

RogerN


From: D from BC on
In article <wfmdnYV9eofSXXPWnZ2dnUVZ_vCdnZ2d(a)earthlink.com>,
regor(a)midwest.net says...
> > A better example for the trinity is a muppet operator.
> > The operator is God and God has a muppet on each hand.
> > Jesus = Kermit the frog
> > Holy spirit = Miss Piggy
> > God is being 3 things and all can be considered one thing.
> > It's a trinity.
> >
> > Christian engineers are ridiculous to believe in God's muppet show.
> > Kermit got nailed and Miss Piggy sprinkles fairy dust on people.
> >
> > --
> > D from BC
> > British Columbia
>
> Ok, what about 3in1 oil?
>
> RogerN
>

3in1 oil is not illogical enough for the trinity.
Not matter how the oil is used it remains oil.
The oil doesn't morph.
Oil follows the law of identity.
Oil is oil.
If oil becomes something else, then it's no longer oil.
When oil turns into talking oil, it's no longer oil.

The trinity is just a confusion tactic.
The confusion from the illogic of the trinity is meant to create the
false impression the trinity is magical or hyperintellectual (Only a God
understands.).
The Christian trinity is like a Zen Buddhist koan.
Koans are not mean to be understood.
Koan example: What is 3 duplicates yet all 3 are different at the same
time?

Christian engineers are ridiculous in believing that confusion
demonstrates divinity.
The trinity is just one of many indoctrination tricks used in
Christianity.


--
D from BC
British Columbia
From: D from BC on
In article <JrOdncCMibY2KXPWnZ2dnUVZ_qKdnZ2d(a)earthlink.com>,
regor(a)midwest.net says...
> > Supernatural miracles are bullshit until at least one amputee grows
> > limbs back.
> >
> >
> > --
> > D from BC
> > British Columbia
>
> That's sort of like saying all electronics is bullshit until they make a
> flux capacitor time machine.
>
>

The absence of something imaginary doesn't prove anything.
The emergence of something real does prove something.

The emergence of real limbs growing back is hard evidence for
supernatural miracles.
Any zero probably event that occurs greatly qualifies as a miracle.
Example: Being strapped to a underground nuclear bomb. It's a miracle if
after the detonation you survive.

Until there's hard evidence for miracles, miracles are as imaginary as
the Cheshire Cat.

Christian engineers are ridiculous to think it's a miracle whenever a
freaky good thing happens.


--
D from BC
British Columbia
From: D from BC on
In article <mda0t5thhsgqi23u2tvhunc0ckcue8q26n(a)4ax.com>,
jfields(a)austininstruments.com says...
> >Christian engineers are ridiculous in naming what's unknown as God.
>
> ---
> Since you don't know what the unknown _is_, you're ridiculous in
> claiming that what's unknown _isn't_ God.
>
> JF
>
>

Ha! You combined a logical fallacy with the God of the Gaps.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_of_the_gaps

People thought lightning was caused by God. (Act of God.)

'Ben Franklin's life-saving invention, the lightning rod, was condemned
by many Christians as an insult to Almighty God, or at least, to his
aim. Because the Bible says God "sends forth lightnings...He covers His
hands with the lightning. And commands it to strike the mark. Its noise
declares His presence?Under the whole heaven He lets it loose, And His
lightning to the ends of the earth... Whether for correction, or for His
world, Or for loving kindness, He causes it to happen." [Job 36:27-33 &
37:1-13 & 38:35]'
http://www.edwardtbabinski.us/skepticism/franklin.html

At the time, it wasn't possible to prove that it wasn't God making
lightning.
God makes lightning until proven false is a logical fallacy.
The 'God makes lighting...' part is a presumption.
It's a presumption due to pitiful evidence for God making lightning.

At the deepest level all imaginary things are impossible to prove false.
Invisible purple monkeys are real until proven false.
Aliens in another dimension are watching you now are real until proven
false.
There's a paper airplane orbiting Alpha Centari. It's true until proven
false.
God makes lightning until proven false.
God is real until proven false.
No!
Something unknown stays unknown until there's evidence.
iows..
It's bullshit until there's evidence.

Christian engineers are ridiculous in using God like duct tape on
scientific unknowns.




--
D from BC
British Columbia
From: RogerN on

"D from BC" <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.265a73d16c93d1c989841(a)209.197.12.12...
> In article <wfmdnYV9eofSXXPWnZ2dnUVZ_vCdnZ2d(a)earthlink.com>,
> regor(a)midwest.net says...
>> > A better example for the trinity is a muppet operator.
>> > The operator is God and God has a muppet on each hand.
>> > Jesus = Kermit the frog
>> > Holy spirit = Miss Piggy
>> > God is being 3 things and all can be considered one thing.
>> > It's a trinity.
>> >
>> > Christian engineers are ridiculous to believe in God's muppet show.
>> > Kermit got nailed and Miss Piggy sprinkles fairy dust on people.
>> >
>> > --
>> > D from BC
>> > British Columbia
>>
>> Ok, what about 3in1 oil?
>>
>> RogerN
>>
>
> 3in1 oil is not illogical enough for the trinity.
> Not matter how the oil is used it remains oil.
> The oil doesn't morph.
> Oil follows the law of identity.
> Oil is oil.
> If oil becomes something else, then it's no longer oil.
> When oil turns into talking oil, it's no longer oil.
>
> The trinity is just a confusion tactic.
> The confusion from the illogic of the trinity is meant to create the
> false impression the trinity is magical or hyperintellectual (Only a God
> understands.).
> The Christian trinity is like a Zen Buddhist koan.
> Koans are not mean to be understood.
> Koan example: What is 3 duplicates yet all 3 are different at the same
> time?
>
> Christian engineers are ridiculous in believing that confusion
> demonstrates divinity.
> The trinity is just one of many indoctrination tricks used in
> Christianity.
>
>
> --
> D from BC
> British Columbia

But oil that can lubricate can also protect metals from corrosion, they can
be a lubricant and a protectant but still be oil.

RogerN