Can Christian Electronic Designers Design?
in [Design]
|
From: RogerN on 6 May 2010 22:00 "D from BC" <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote in message news:MPG.264bd7197856cf23989824(a)209.197.12.12... > In article <8JCdnZXn7MwNPX3WnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d(a)earthlink.com>, > regor(a)midwest.net says... >> > It's more ethical if there's less conditions for medical help. >> > It's more ethical if there's less conditions for God to help. >> > >> > >> > -- >> > D from BC >> > British Columbia >> >> No, wrong again. Man and God had a relationship, man choose not to obey >> God, as a result man and God were separated. God made a covenant with >> man, > > Adam + Eve had a relationship with God. God barked orders and Adam and > EVe obeyed. It was a good relationship until Mr S. took advantage that > Eve was deficient(by God) in evil detection skills. > AFter they were specifically told not to jump on God's land mines, Adam > and Eve jumped on the land mines. > Adam and Eve do not explode but they did get evicted for partying too > loud. > >> that covenant includes healing. If man keeps mans part, God does God's > > You claim God has a deal with humans that God does healing. > >> part. I suppose you also believe a SMPS should work without any power >> source? Why not, if a circuit is good and electricity never fails, it >> should work no matter what. That is how stupid ALL your arguments are. >> >> RogerN >> >> > > Say there's a deal(covenant) between God and humans for healing. > God's certainly wants something out of this deal. > It's unethical that God wants something. > It's doesn't matter what he wants, it's that God has a want. > It's more ethical if a God wants nothing and just heals. > An altruistic God is more good than a God with > needs/conditions/requirements/prerequisites. > An altuistic God is a God that doesn't need prayer. > A God with needs such as the need to be glorified is a weak God. > > Christian engineers are ridiculous in believing in a God that has > invented an ineffective way to get glorified. > > > -- > D from BC > British Columbia And yet, for some unknown (to me) reason, God loves you and would like a relationship with you. RogerN
From: D from BC on 6 May 2010 22:58 In article <dI2dnX10cZbf6X7WnZ2dnUVZ_gydnZ2d(a)earthlink.com>, regor(a)midwest.net says... > > Say there's a deal(covenant) between God and humans for healing. > > God's certainly wants something out of this deal. > > It's unethical that God wants something. > > It's doesn't matter what he wants, it's that God has a want. > > It's more ethical if a God wants nothing and just heals. > > An altruistic God is more good than a God with > > needs/conditions/requirements/prerequisites. > > An altuistic God is a God that doesn't need prayer. > > A God with needs such as the need to be glorified is a weak God. > > > > Christian engineers are ridiculous in believing in a God that has > > invented an ineffective way to get glorified. > > > > > > -- > > D from BC > > British Columbia > > And yet, for some unknown (to me) reason, God loves you and would like a > relationship with you. > > RogerN > According to psychological studies, you can get the same relationship feeling and love from any imaginary character. All you have to do is project characteristics that you admire most onto the imaginary character and 'bingo' you get mind masterbation. (More on that later. Had iLASIk done.) If you only get that special feeling with God then perhaps try hanging with better people/women or different relatives. Real relationships are more respectable than relationships with invisible entities. -- D from BC British Columbia
From: D from BC on 7 May 2010 15:49 In article <8Z-dnb425vU7oFbWnZ2dnUVZ_r-dnZ2d(a)earthlink.com>, regor(a)midwest.net says... > > Atheists request a new contract. > > You got it, pretend God doesn't exist and he'll let you think there is no > evidence for his existence. Blessed are those who expect nothing of God, > they won't be disappointed. > God's deal with humans is that God is allowed to have the petty discrimination of nonbelievers. This discrimination is unjust. God has no respect and no reward for the wide variety of human mindsets. God is a thought racist. You must have the Jesus plug-in or else you get no cake. An almighty superpowerful entity wants petty worship/belief and prayer. Worship+belief+ prayer is what God wants to pass a soul to heaven. God is collecting good souls in an inefficient and ineffective fashion. God is not all power in that going from point A to point B is not direct, not efficient, not effective, not fast and with low certainty. Point A is humans on earth. Point B stick'm some in heaven. God's soul farm is a like a crappy greenhouse. God's soul greenhouse maintained by God has broken lights and windows, leaking hoses, grasshoppers and pests, plant disease, weeds and deficient soil. God's has high input resources with low output. After 3000 years, Christianity was only able to take 33% of globe. God would certainly fail ISO9000 qualifications. Christian engineers are ridiculous in that production ethics are more superior to Gods production of souls for heaven. -- D from BC British Columbia
From: RogerN on 7 May 2010 19:34 "D from BC" <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote in message news:MPG.264d218491036f7989829(a)209.197.12.12... > In article <dI2dnX10cZbf6X7WnZ2dnUVZ_gydnZ2d(a)earthlink.com>, > regor(a)midwest.net says... >> > Say there's a deal(covenant) between God and humans for healing. >> > God's certainly wants something out of this deal. >> > It's unethical that God wants something. >> > It's doesn't matter what he wants, it's that God has a want. >> > It's more ethical if a God wants nothing and just heals. >> > An altruistic God is more good than a God with >> > needs/conditions/requirements/prerequisites. >> > An altuistic God is a God that doesn't need prayer. >> > A God with needs such as the need to be glorified is a weak God. >> > >> > Christian engineers are ridiculous in believing in a God that has >> > invented an ineffective way to get glorified. >> > >> > >> > -- >> > D from BC >> > British Columbia >> >> And yet, for some unknown (to me) reason, God loves you and would like a >> relationship with you. >> >> RogerN >> > > According to psychological studies, you can get the same relationship > feeling and love from any imaginary character. All you have to do is > project characteristics that you admire most onto the imaginary > character and 'bingo' you get mind masterbation. > (More on that later. Had iLASIk done.) > > If you only get that special feeling with God then perhaps try hanging > with better people/women or different relatives. > Real relationships are more respectable than relationships with > invisible entities. > > > -- > D from BC > British Columbia I'd say you are probably right for once. Perhaps that is why there are so many different denominations. Perhaps most create God in their image, or imagination. That is why it is important to understand the God of the Bible, the one we may not agree with at times, the one that you judge for not following the rules you think he should follow. At one point in my life I didn't like what I was reading about God in the Bible, I didn't agree with him. I told God that one of us was going to have to change. At that moment I felt that God said "That's what I've been trying to tell you, and I never change" so I changed my imaginary God to fit the Biblical God. I pretty much erased all my pre-conceived ideas of God and set out to get to know him myself. RogerN
From: D from BC on 7 May 2010 22:26
In article <9fOdndda7uY8PnnWnZ2dnUVZ_uGdnZ2d(a)earthlink.com>, regor(a)midwest.net says... > > I'd say you are probably right for once. Perhaps that is why there are so > many different denominations. Perhaps most create God in their image, or > imagination. That is why it is important to understand the God of the > Bible, the one we may not agree with at times, the one that you judge for > not following the rules you think he should follow. At one point in my life > I didn't like what I was reading about God in the Bible, I didn't agree with > him. I told God that one of us was going to have to change. At that moment > I felt that God said "That's what I've been trying to tell you, and I never > change" so I changed my imaginary God to fit the Biblical God. I pretty > much erased all my pre-conceived ideas of God and set out to get to know him > myself. > > RogerN > > Switching to new Test. God or old Test. God? -- D from BC British Columbia |