Does God need to prove He exists?
in [Physics]
|
From: rbwinn on 19 Jun 2008 08:30 On Jun 18, 8:05 pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)" <alwh...(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > On Jun 19, 12:54 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 18, 3:26�pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)" > > > <alwh...(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > > > On Jun 19, 8:10 am, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: > > > > > > So we're still in this position: > > > > > > The Bible mentions a tunnel and a ramp that can be seen today. This is > > > > > evidence that the sites existed at the time the texts were written. What > > > > > additional conclusion could we draw from it?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > We could draw the conclusion that an atheist was wrong when he said > > > > that there is nothing in the Bible that can be proven. > > > > Robert B. Winn > > > > We could draw the conclusion you lied about what atheists said so you > > > could win an argument with yourself. > > > > Al- Hide quoted text - > > > You can draw any conclusion you want to draw.  What is it supposed to > > have to do with me? > > Robert B. Winn > > Well, you would be the one consistently lying about what everyone > says. > > Al- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Well, I think you will find that I have been completely truthful about everything. Harry Potter is really not going to be able to save you. Robert B. Winn
From: rbwinn on 19 Jun 2008 08:40 On Jun 18, 9:19 pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)" <alwh...(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > On Jun 19, 1:18 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 18, 5:41�pm, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:07:49 -0700 (PDT), asilentskeptic > > > <asilentskep...(a)gmail.com> wrote in alt.atheism: > > > > >On Jun 18, 12:51 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: > > > >> rbwinn wrote: > > > >> > On Jun 16, 11:29 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: > > > >> >> rbwinn wrote: > > > >> >>> On Jun 16, 1:19 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: > > > >> >>>> rbwinn wrote: > > > >> >>>>> On Jun 16, 12:50 am, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: > > > >> >>>>>> rbwinn wrote: > > > >> >>>>>>> On Jun 15, 6:32?am, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: > > > >> >>>>>>>> On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 05:46:58 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> > > > >> >>>>>>>> wrote in alt.atheism: > > > >> >>>>>>>>> On Jun 14, 6:33?pm, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 12:48:13 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi....(a)juno.com> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote in alt.atheism: > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 14, 6:52?am, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 06:45:55 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in alt.atheism: > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 12, 9:45?pm, none <""doug\"@(none)"> wrote: > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote: > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think you should explain your ideas to the twelve apostles after the > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resurrection takes place, Darrell. > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you do not know how many there are (if any) or their names > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and you just hide behind the statement above to cover your > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignorance. ?Just like in your failed attempts to argue > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> physics, you do not even know enough to argue your religious > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> beliefs and have to retreat to claiming ignorance. > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I did not claim ignorance. ?I just told Darrell to look them up > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> himself. > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> You admit failure, no matter how you describe it. > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Why, because Darrell is not going to look them up? ?I do not care what > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Darrell does. > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> You told him to look it up because you didn't have the evidence. You ran > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> away from the question.- Hide quoted text - > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text - > > > >> >>>>>>>>> Nope. ?I told atheists a long time ago I was not going to be their > > > >> >>>>>>>>> researcher. > > > >> >>>>>>>> You refuse to do the research to back up your own claims. You are no > > > >> >>>>>>>> one's researcher. You worship ignorance.- Hide quoted text - > > > >> >>>>>>>> - Show quoted text - > > > >> >>>>>>> Well, I did a little �better than the atheists on Hezekiah's tunnel > > > >> >>>>>>> and the ramp over the city wall at Lachish. > > > >> >>>>>> No. You only think you did. For some reason. Could you tell us why?- Hide quoted text - > > > >> >>>>>> - Show quoted text - > > > >> >>>>> Yes, I can do that. �There is an actual earthen ramp built by the > > > >> >>>>> Assyrian army that still exists today. �There is an actual conduit for > > > >> >>>>> water between Gihon spring and the Pool of Siloam, just as the Bible > > > >> >>>>> says there is. �The problem that atheists have is that J.K. Rowling is > > > >> >>>>> from northern England. �When she wrote about Harry Potter leaving from > > > >> >>>>> the train station in London, probably the only thing she knew about > > > >> >>>>> the train station was its name. � So comparing the Biblical account, > > > >> >>>>> which can be easily verified by going to Israel and looking at the > > > >> >>>>> ramp and the conduit for water, to what J.K. Rowling wrote in a book > > > >> >>>>> which she said was fiction means nothing to me, however sacred it may > > > >> >>>>> be to you atheists. > > > >> >>>>> Robert B. Winn > > > >> >>>> So, substituting ... > > > >> >>>> Yes, I can do that. �There is an actual major city founded by the > > > >> >>>> Romans that still exists today. �There is an actual railway station, > > > >> >>>> just as Harry Potter says there is. > > > >> >>>> We know that Harry Potter is fiction. You're claiming Biblical authority > > > >> >>>> SOLELY on the existence of some mentioned ancient sites. We're pointing > > > >> >>>> out that by the same logic, you would be forced to admit Harry Potter's > > > >> >>>> authority. If can't t accept its authority, then your argument need > > > >> >>>> reexamination. Maybe the Bible needs more support for its extraordinary > > > >> >>>> claims.- Hide quoted text - > > > >> >>>> - Show quoted text - > > > >> >>> There is also a woman who calls herself J.K. Rowling who says she > > > >> >>> wrote the Harry Potter books as fiction, regardless of how many > > > >> >>> atheists believe them. > > > >> >>> I am not claiming Biblical authority SOLEY on the existence of some > > > >> >>> mentioned ancient sites. �An atheist claimed that there was nothing in > > > >> >>> the Bible that could be verified by anything that exists today, so I > > > >> >>> mentioned Hezekiah's tunnel. �It was not an argument. > > > >> >> We'll have to take your word about the claim, but okay. You were > > > >> >> correct, and I don't think that point is contended. Some things in the > > > >> >> Bible are verifiable. > > > > >> >>> It was information about something mentioned in the Bible that can be seen > > > >> >>> today. �And as we can see, atheists still claim that Hezekiah's tunnel > > > >> >>> is exactly like Harry Potter leaving for wizard's school, including > > > >> >>> you. �No, Hezekiah's tunnel is not exactly like Harry Potter leaving > > > >> >>> for wizard's school. �You atheists are not going to be able to > > > >> >>> convince me that Hezekiah's tunnel is exactly like Harry Potter > > > >> >>> leaving for wizard's school. �As long as you continue to try to > > > >> >>> convince me that Hezekiah's tunnel is exactly like Harry Potter > > > >> >>> leaving for wizard's school, I will continue to say that you do not > > > >> >>> believe Hezekiah's tunnel exists because Harry Potter does not exist > > > >> >>> and wizard's school does not exist. > > > >> >> Then you would be persisting in your error. If you were simply trying to > > > >> >> say that at least SOME of the Bible is true, then okay, you've made your > > > >> >> point. We thought you were arguing for the accuracy of the WHOLE on the > > > >> >> basis of these minor points. Okay, a whole lot of arguing over nothing > > > >> >> now that we know what your claim really is. (Is that it?) > > > > >> >> If you are saying that Hezekiah's > > > > >> >>> tunnel is exactly like Harry Potter leaving for wizard's school, then > > > >> >>> you are saying that Hezekiah's tunnel does not exist. > > > >> >> That is of course a deliberate misrepresentation, but I think I can > > > >> >> understand why you're making it now.- Hide quoted text - > > > > >> >> - Show quoted text - > > > > >> > It is not a deliberate misrepresentation. �The Biblical account of the > > > >> > Assyrian invasion of Judea is much more believable than any other > > > >> > account of the same events, including the account of Sennacherib, the > > > >> > Assyrian king, which is the account that atheists promote because it > > > >> > is different from the Biblical one. > > > > >> You would need to say WHY you find it more believable than the > > > >> mainstream account if you want any support for your views. I don't have > > > >> any familiarity with the events in question, so I don't have an opinion > > > >> either way (or some third, unexplored option), depite being an evil atheist. > > > > >> > But none of these ancient > > > >> > accounts have anything to do with Harry Potter, a character in a > > > >> > modern work of fiction. > > > > >> I agree, they don't have anything to do with it, except that drawing > > > >> support for the Bible's claims on this basis is like trying to support > > > >> Harry Potter by mentioning London. If you believe the Bible is Truth > > > >> because of these sites, then you should believe that Harry Potter is > > > >> Truth for the same reason. > > > > >> � �Nevertheless, all I had to do to get a > > > > >> > response about Harry Potter was mention Hezekiah's tunnel, a conduit > > > >> > for water constructed during the Assyrian invasion or the earthen ramp > > > >> > that the Assyrian army built to get over the city wall at Lachish. > > > >> > According to atheists, these evidences of the Assyrian invasion were > > > >> > exactly like Harry Potter leaving for wizard's school. > > > > >> We believe you're trying to show Biblical authority by mentioning these > > > >> sites. While you persist in this logical fallacy, we're going to stick > > > >> with the Harry Potter comparrison. :-) > > > > >> Anyone hysterical yet? > > > > >I gave up after using two further examples and some further comments.. > > > >Spiderman and the Iliad. > > > > >I don't like to deal with the deliberately obtuse. > > > > Yes, Mr. Winn has gone beyond merely being obtuse to being intentionally > > > dishonest. Even the LDS and other Christians should chastise him for his > > > lies. I don't expect him to ever repent of his foolish dishonesty.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > Well, I mentioned two things, a ramp and a conduit for water > > constructed during the Assyrian invasion of Judea.  Which of those do > > you claim I lied about? > > Robert B. Winn > > You lied about the reason for posting those two "facts".  The bible > mentions cows too, and there are cows.  We'll ignore the cud-chewing > rabbits for the moment, but no-one said everything mentioned in the > bible was falsehood.  Just that it was generally a work of fiction. > You then leapt in and told everyone that "Atheists are always saying > everything in the bible is false."  LIE. > > Al- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Well, no, it is not a lie, Al. Even if an atheist appears to say that something in the Bible is true, there is always something in the statement they make that claims it is also false. For instance, with regard to the two things I mentioned, it is impossible for an atheist to discuss these two things without also discussing Harry Potter, Spiderman, or some other fictional thing that shows what they really think about it. Look at your statement. The Bible mentions cows, but the Bible mentions rabbits chewing cud, so the mention of cows in the Bible proves that the Bible is untrue. Atheists are incapable of discussing the Bible rationally. Robert B. Winn
From: rbwinn on 19 Jun 2008 08:44 On Jun 18, 10:37 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: > rbwinn wrote: > > On Jun 18, 12:47 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: > >> rbwinn wrote: > >>> On Jun 17, 12:59 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: > >>>> rbwinn wrote: > >>>>> On Jun 16, 11:29 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: > >>>>>> rbwinn wrote: > >>>>>>> On Jun 16, 1:19 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: > >>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote: > >>>>>>>>> On Jun 16, 12:50 am, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 15, 6:32�am, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 05:46:58 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in alt.atheism: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 14, 6:33?pm, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 12:48:13 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in alt.atheism: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 14, 6:52?am, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 06:45:55 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi....(a)juno.com> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in alt.atheism: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 12, 9:45?pm, none <""doug\"@(none)"> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think you should explain your ideas to the twelve apostles after the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resurrection takes place, Darrell. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you do not know how many there are (if any) or their names > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and you just hide behind the statement above to cover your > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignorance. ?Just like in your failed attempts to argue > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> physics, you do not even know enough to argue your religious > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beliefs and have to retreat to claiming ignorance. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I did not claim ignorance. ?I just told Darrell to look them up > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> himself. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You admit failure, no matter how you describe it. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why, because Darrell is not going to look them up? ?I do not care what > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Darrell does. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You told him to look it up because you didn't have the evidence. You ran > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> away from the question.- Hide quoted text - > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text - > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. �I told atheists a long time ago I was not going to be their > >>>>>>>>>>>>> researcher. > >>>>>>>>>>>> You refuse to do the research to back up your own claims. You are no > >>>>>>>>>>>> one's researcher. You worship ignorance.- Hide quoted text - > >>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text - > >>>>>>>>>>> Well, I did a little  better than the atheists on Hezekiah's tunnel > >>>>>>>>>>> and the ramp over the city wall at Lachish. > >>>>>>>>>> No. You only think you did. For some reason. Could you tell us why?- Hide quoted text - > >>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text - > >>>>>>>>> Yes, I can do that.  There is an actual earthen ramp built by the > >>>>>>>>> Assyrian army that still exists today.  There is an actual conduit for > >>>>>>>>> water between Gihon spring and the Pool of Siloam, just as the Bible > >>>>>>>>> says there is.  The problem that atheists have is that J.K.. Rowling is > >>>>>>>>> from northern England.  When she wrote about Harry Potter leaving from > >>>>>>>>> the train station in London, probably the only thing she knew about > >>>>>>>>> the train station was its name.  So comparing the Biblical account, > >>>>>>>>> which can be easily verified by going to Israel and looking at the > >>>>>>>>> ramp and the conduit for water, to what J.K. Rowling wrote in a book > >>>>>>>>> which she said was fiction means nothing to me, however sacred it may > >>>>>>>>> be to you atheists. > >>>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn > >>>>>>>> So, substituting ... > >>>>>>>> Yes, I can do that.  There is an actual major city founded by the > >>>>>>>> Romans that still exists today.  There is an actual railway station, > >>>>>>>> just as Harry Potter says there is. > >>>>>>>> We know that Harry Potter is fiction. You're claiming Biblical authority > >>>>>>>> SOLELY on the existence of some mentioned ancient sites. We're pointing > >>>>>>>> out that by the same logic, you would be forced to admit Harry Potter's > >>>>>>>> authority. If can't t accept its authority, then your argument need > >>>>>>>> reexamination. Maybe the Bible needs more support for its extraordinary > >>>>>>>> claims.- Hide quoted text - > >>>>>>>> - Show quoted text - > >>>>>>> There is also a woman who calls herself J.K. Rowling who says she > >>>>>>> wrote the Harry Potter books as fiction, regardless of how many > >>>>>>> atheists believe them. > >>>>>>> I am not claiming Biblical authority SOLEY on the existence of some > >>>>>>> mentioned ancient sites.  An atheist claimed that there was nothing in > >>>>>>> the Bible that could be verified by anything that exists today, so I > >>>>>>> mentioned Hezekiah's tunnel.  It was not an argument. > >>>>>> We'll have to take your word about the claim, but okay. You were > >>>>>> correct, and I don't think that point is contended. Some things in the > >>>>>> Bible are verifiable. > >>>>>>> It was information about something mentioned in the Bible that can be seen > >>>>>>> today.  And as we can see, atheists still claim that Hezekiah's tunnel > >>>>>>> is exactly like Harry Potter leaving for wizard's school, including > >>>>>>> you.  No, Hezekiah's tunnel is not exactly like Harry Potter leaving > >>>>>>> for wizard's school.  You atheists are not going to be able to > >>>>>>> convince me that Hezekiah's tunnel is exactly like Harry Potter > >>>>>>> leaving for wizard's school.  As long as you continue to try to > >>>>>>> convince me that Hezekiah's tunnel is exactly like Harry Potter > >>>>>>> leaving for wizard's school, I will continue to say that you do not > >>>>>>> believe Hezekiah's tunnel exists because Harry Potter does not exist > >>>>>>> and wizard's school does not exist. > >>>>>> Then you would be persisting in your error. If you were simply trying to > >>>>>> say that at least SOME of the Bible is true, then okay, you've made your > >>>>>> point. We thought you were arguing for the accuracy of the WHOLE on the > >>>>>> basis of these minor points. Okay, a whole lot of arguing over nothing > >>>>>> now that we know what your claim really is. (Is that it?) > >>>>>> If you are saying that Hezekiah's > >>>>>>> tunnel is exactly like Harry Potter leaving for wizard's school, then > >>>>>>> you are saying that Hezekiah's tunnel does not exist. > >>>>>> That is of course a deliberate misrepresentation, but I think I can > >>>>>> understand why you're making it now.- Hide quoted text - > >>>>>> - Show quoted text - > >>>>> It is not a deliberate misrepresentation.  The Biblical account of the > >>>>> Assyrian invasion of Judea is much more believable than any other > >>>>> account of the same events, including the account of Sennacherib, the > >>>>> Assyrian king, which is the account that atheists promote because it > >>>>> is different from the Biblical one.  But none of these ancient > >>>>> accounts have anything to do with Harry Potter, a character in a > >>>>> modern work of fiction.  Nevertheless, all I had to do to get a > >>>>> response about Harry Potter was mention Hezekiah's tunnel, a conduit > >>>>> for water constructed during the Assyrian invasion or the earthen ramp > >>>>> that the Assyrian army built to get over the city wall at Lachish. > >>>>> According to atheists, these evidences of the Assyrian invasion were > >>>>> exactly like Harry Potter leaving for wizard's school. > >>>> Rationalise the lie as much as you like, it's still a lie. No-one is > >>>> denying the existence your tunnel or ramp.- Hide quoted text - > >>>> - Show quoted text - > >>> Well that is wonderful.  So what happened to Harry Potter's magical > >>> powers?  You atheists thought Harry Potter could make the ramp and > >>> conduit disappear, didn't you? > >> Not at all, you're just drawing more from these sites than is reasonable > >> to do so. So what happened to God's magical powers?- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > Why don't you ask God? > > Because I see no good reason to believe in them. The tunnel and ramp's > existence don't change that.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Well, you either believe in God, or you do not. If I did not believe in something, I would find something else to discuss. The only thing you want to talk about is God. I say, Here is a ramp and a tunnel. You say, I want to talk about God. Well, go ahead and talk about God, but I can tell you ahead of time, you do not know anything about God. No atheist does. Robert B. Winn
From: rbwinn on 19 Jun 2008 08:48 On Jun 18, 10:40 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: > rbwinn wrote: > > On Jun 18, 1:07 pm, asilentskeptic <asilentskep...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Jun 18, 12:51 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: > > >>> rbwinn wrote: > >>>> On Jun 16, 11:29 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: > >>>>> rbwinn wrote: > >>>>>> On Jun 16, 1:19 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: > >>>>>>> rbwinn wrote: > >>>>>>>> On Jun 16, 12:50 am, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> On Jun 15, 6:32�am, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 05:46:58 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote in alt.atheism: > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 14, 6:33?pm, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 12:48:13 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in alt.atheism: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 14, 6:52?am, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 06:45:55 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in alt.atheism: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 12, 9:45?pm, none <""doug\"@(none)"> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think you should explain your ideas to the twelve apostles after the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resurrection takes place, Darrell. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you do not know how many there are (if any) or their names > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and you just hide behind the statement above to cover your > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignorance. ?Just like in your failed attempts to argue > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> physics, you do not even know enough to argue your religious > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beliefs and have to retreat to claiming ignorance. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I did not claim ignorance. ?I just told Darrell to look them up > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> himself. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You admit failure, no matter how you describe it. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why, because Darrell is not going to look them up? ?I do not care what > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Darrell does. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> You told him to look it up because you didn't have the evidence. You ran > >>>>>>>>>>>>> away from the question.- Hide quoted text - > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text - > >>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. �I told atheists a long time ago I was not going to be their > >>>>>>>>>>>> researcher. > >>>>>>>>>>> You refuse to do the research to back up your own claims. You are no > >>>>>>>>>>> one's researcher. You worship ignorance.- Hide quoted text - > >>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text - > >>>>>>>>>> Well, I did a little  better than the atheists on Hezekiah's tunnel > >>>>>>>>>> and the ramp over the city wall at Lachish. > >>>>>>>>> No. You only think you did. For some reason. Could you tell us why?- Hide quoted text - > >>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text - > >>>>>>>> Yes, I can do that.  There is an actual earthen ramp built by the > >>>>>>>> Assyrian army that still exists today.  There is an actual conduit for > >>>>>>>> water between Gihon spring and the Pool of Siloam, just as the Bible > >>>>>>>> says there is.  The problem that atheists have is that J.K. Rowling is > >>>>>>>> from northern England.  When she wrote about Harry Potter leaving from > >>>>>>>> the train station in London, probably the only thing she knew about > >>>>>>>> the train station was its name.  So comparing the Biblical account, > >>>>>>>> which can be easily verified by going to Israel and looking at the > >>>>>>>> ramp and the conduit for water, to what J.K. Rowling wrote in a book > >>>>>>>> which she said was fiction means nothing to me, however sacred it may > >>>>>>>> be to you atheists. > >>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn > >>>>>>> So, substituting ... > >>>>>>> Yes, I can do that.  There is an actual major city founded by the > >>>>>>> Romans that still exists today.  There is an actual railway station, > >>>>>>> just as Harry Potter says there is. > >>>>>>> We know that Harry Potter is fiction. You're claiming Biblical authority > >>>>>>> SOLELY on the existence of some mentioned ancient sites. We're pointing > >>>>>>> out that by the same logic, you would be forced to admit Harry Potter's > >>>>>>> authority. If can't t accept its authority, then your argument need > >>>>>>> reexamination. Maybe the Bible needs more support for its extraordinary > >>>>>>> claims.- Hide quoted text - > >>>>>>> - Show quoted text - > >>>>>> There is also a woman who calls herself J.K. Rowling who says she > >>>>>> wrote the Harry Potter books as fiction, regardless of how many > >>>>>> atheists believe them. > >>>>>> I am not claiming Biblical authority SOLEY on the existence of some > >>>>>> mentioned ancient sites.  An atheist claimed that there was nothing in > >>>>>> the Bible that could be verified by anything that exists today, so I > >>>>>> mentioned Hezekiah's tunnel.  It was not an argument. > >>>>> We'll have to take your word about the claim, but okay. You were > >>>>> correct, and I don't think that point is contended. Some things in the > >>>>> Bible are verifiable. > >>>>>> It was information about something mentioned in the Bible that can be seen > >>>>>> today.  And as we can see, atheists still claim that Hezekiah's tunnel > >>>>>> is exactly like Harry Potter leaving for wizard's school, including > >>>>>> you.  No, Hezekiah's tunnel is not exactly like Harry Potter leaving > >>>>>> for wizard's school.  You atheists are not going to be able to > >>>>>> convince me that Hezekiah's tunnel is exactly like Harry Potter > >>>>>> leaving for wizard's school.  As long as you continue to try to > >>>>>> convince me that Hezekiah's tunnel is exactly like Harry Potter > >>>>>> leaving for wizard's school, I will continue to say that you do not > >>>>>> believe Hezekiah's tunnel exists because Harry Potter does not exist > >>>>>> and wizard's school does not exist. > >>>>> Then you would be persisting in your error. If you were simply trying to > >>>>> say that at least SOME of the Bible is true, then okay, you've made your > >>>>> point. We thought you were arguing for the accuracy of the WHOLE on the > >>>>> basis of these minor points. Okay, a whole lot of arguing over nothing > >>>>> now that we know what your claim really is. (Is that it?) > >>>>> If you are saying that Hezekiah's > >>>>>> tunnel is exactly like Harry Potter leaving for wizard's school, then > >>>>>> you are saying that Hezekiah's tunnel does not exist. > >>>>> That is of course a deliberate misrepresentation, but I think I can > >>>>> understand why you're making it now.- Hide quoted text - > >>>>> - Show quoted text - > >>>> It is not a deliberate misrepresentation.  The Biblical account of the > >>>> Assyrian invasion of Judea is much more believable than any other > >>>> account of the same events, including the account of Sennacherib, the > >>>> Assyrian king, which is the account that atheists promote because it > >>>> is different from the Biblical one. > >>> You would need to say WHY you find it more believable than the > >>> mainstream account if you want any support for your views. I don't have > >>> any familiarity with the events in question, so I don't have an opinion > >>> either way (or some third, unexplored option), depite being an evil atheist. > >>>> But none of these ancient > >>>> accounts have anything to do with Harry Potter, a character in a > >>>> modern work of fiction. > >>> I agree, they don't have anything to do with it, except that drawing > >>> support for the Bible's claims on this basis is like trying to support > >>> Harry Potter by mentioning London. If you believe the Bible is Truth > >>> because of these sites, then you should believe that Harry Potter is > >>> Truth for the same reason. > >>>   Nevertheless, all I had to do to get a > >>>> response about Harry Potter was mention Hezekiah's tunnel, a conduit > >>>> for water constructed during the Assyrian invasion or the earthen ramp > >>>> that the Assyrian army built to get over the city wall at Lachish. > >>>> According to atheists, these evidences of the Assyrian invasion were > >>>> exactly like Harry Potter leaving for wizard's school. > >>> We believe you're trying to show Biblical authority by mentioning these > >>> sites. While you persist in this logical fallacy, we're going to stick > >>> with the Harry Potter comparrison. :-) > >>> Anyone hysterical yet? > >> I gave up after using two further examples and some further comments. > >> Spiderman and the Iliad. > > >> I don't like to deal with the deliberately obtuse.- Hide quoted text - > > > Well, you don't accept the evidence I offer, and I don't accept the > > evidence you offer.  I have better evidence./ > > Do you believe your stance is logically consistent?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Yes, I believe my stance is logically consistent. Robert B. Winn
From: TT on 19 Jun 2008 08:51
rbwinn wrote: > On Jun 18, 8:05 pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)" > <alwh...(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: >> On Jun 19, 12:54 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Jun 18, 3:26�pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)" >>> <alwh...(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: >>>> On Jun 19, 8:10 am, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: >>>>>> So we're still in this position: >>>>>> The Bible mentions a tunnel and a ramp that can be seen today. This is >>>>>> evidence that the sites existed at the time the texts were written. What >>>>>> additional conclusion could we draw from it?- Hide quoted text - >>>>>> - Show quoted text - >>>>> We could draw the conclusion that an atheist was wrong when he said >>>>> that there is nothing in the Bible that can be proven. >>>>> Robert B. Winn >>>> We could draw the conclusion you lied about what atheists said so you >>>> could win an argument with yourself. >>>> Al- Hide quoted text - >>> You can draw any conclusion you want to draw. What is it supposed to >>> have to do with me? >>> Robert B. Winn >> Well, you would be the one consistently lying about what everyone >> says. >> >> Al- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > Well, I think you will find that I have been completely truthful about > everything. Harry Potter is really not going to be able to save you. > Robert B. Winn Neither will the bobblehead doll on the dashboard of your fear/faith..we just don't need to deny it... -- “Cowardice asks the question, 'Is it safe?' Expediency asks the question, 'Is it politic?' But conscience asks the question, 'Is it right?' And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular but because conscience tells one it is right.” Martin Luther king Jr. |