Vulcan .Net and VO 2.8 - yeah right....
in [Visual Objects]
|
From: Geoff Schaller on 4 Oct 2006 09:01 Brian. Seeing that you deign to enter a frivolous comment, how about a real one? What are your intentions for the Win32 development of VO. Is VO 2.8 to be the last point release or can we expect more? What is the maintenance and fix plan to be beyond 2006? Are you considering further class repairs or even enhancements? Thanks, Geoff "Brian" <b.ian_(a)g.afx_soft.com> wrote in message news:4523ae07$0$5195$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com: > Phil, > > > > Misintepretation and spin is your game most of the time. > > > So true. > > > > Geoff you posted so much misinformation you got the bullet from VOPS. > > You just make it up and then keep pushing the story .. your worse than > > FOX news. > > > ROTF,L, Isn't FOX News the one that claims "Fair and Balanced" ? > That comment is priceless ! > > All the best, > > Brian
From: Geoff Schaller on 4 Oct 2006 09:02 What is your point Phil? "Sherlock" <sherlock(a)sherlock.com.au> wrote in message news:1159961432.310632.37760(a)h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com: > Geoff, > > snip[ I can now find C# developers to add to my team at the drop of a > hat. For VO (and obviously Vulcan), I would have to train them. This > won't worry the individual or contractor but it is of concern to the > workshop. ] > > With almost unlimited work out there ,.. how come these guys/gals are > looking for job ? > Some of the developers I have met with 'quickie' program courses are > not worth feeding. > > You guys say over and over and over you have to learn the framework and > this is basis of .NET and it is obvious no language will suit > everybody. You have a suite of language choices available to build a > .NET app. > > Look at the list of languages for .NET > > http://www.dotnetpowered.com/languages.aspx > > Even VULCAN is on the list. Quite frankly if there are this many > langauges already in .NET and this would of cost quite a bit a lot of > developers want to stay with a language they know. > > Phil McGuinness > ------------------------
From: Sherlock on 4 Oct 2006 13:55 Graham snip[ aware what PHP is Phil ] Thank goodness... for a minute I thought you were stuck in C# mode... <bg> snip[ aren't Robinson Crusoe in using it ] I know how he felt .... what a guy get everything done by Friday... !! Phil ----
From: Geoff Schaller on 5 Oct 2006 18:57 The silence is deafening. I guess that signals your intent well enough. "Geoff Schaller" <geoff(a)xxxsoftwareobjectives.com.au> wrote in message news:4523b0af$1(a)dnews.tpgi.com.au: > Brian. > > Seeing that you deign to enter a frivolous comment, how about a real > one? What are your intentions for the Win32 development of VO. Is VO 2.8 > to be the last point release or can we expect more? What is the > maintenance and fix plan to be beyond 2006? Are you considering further > class repairs or even enhancements? > > Thanks, > > Geoff
From: Graham McKechnie on 6 Oct 2006 08:26
Geoff Well what did you expect? You're not in the "exclusive clubby thing" anymore. I think you are pushing a load up hill even trying for an answer!! The marketing department is doing its usual - nothing step. Graham "Geoff Schaller" <geoff(a)xxxsoftwareobjectives.com.au> wrote in message news:45258dde$1(a)dnews.tpgi.com.au... > The silence is deafening. I guess that signals your intent well enough. > > > "Geoff Schaller" <geoff(a)xxxsoftwareobjectives.com.au> wrote in message > news:4523b0af$1(a)dnews.tpgi.com.au: > >> Brian. >> >> Seeing that you deign to enter a frivolous comment, how about a real >> one? What are your intentions for the Win32 development of VO. Is VO 2.8 >> to be the last point release or can we expect more? What is the >> maintenance and fix plan to be beyond 2006? Are you considering further >> class repairs or even enhancements? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Geoff > |