Vulcan .Net and VO 2.8 - yeah right....
in [Visual Objects]
|
From: Sherlock on 4 Oct 2006 07:10 snip[ Is there a point to all this fluff - Is PHP your favourite term this month? - more garbage Phil. ] PHP has been the best thing to happen for web developers and to getting clients work out quickly and reliably and profitably and the backend database and server platform is a non issue. We have used it for about 5-6 years now and no chances we will break with this. Phil McGuinness ---------------------------
From: Sherlock on 4 Oct 2006 07:11 Geoff snip[ So this means that GrafX will be continuing two separate VO development streams: a Win32 and a Dot Net version. ] If its financial why not ? Phil McGuinness -----------------------
From: E?!k V!sser on 4 Oct 2006 07:16 rofl rofl rofl Erik made a typo! Erik made a typo rofl rofl rofl "Geoff Schaller" <geoff(a)xxxsoftwareobjectives.com.au> schreef in bericht news:4523960b$1(a)dnews.tpgi.com.au... > Me... confusing? <rofl>. This is a direct cut from YOUR post: > > *********************** >> that he will continue VO32 'forever' > should be > that he will _not_ continue VO32 'forever' > Erik > *********************** > > Come on Eric, you're making a 3 ring circus out of this. > Whether or not Brian has made up his mind is moot. We don't know and want > to. > You certainly haven't <g>. > > > > > "ER!k V!sser" <burod000_notthis_(a)planet.nl> wrote in message > news:4ohcouFeku0cU1(a)individual.net: > >> Geoff, >> >> You can try to make as much confusion as you want but >> >> >> > If VO 2.8 is it, as it now seems likely, that will certainly spur folks >> > on >> > to something else. >> >> >> I have made clearly that Brian has stated very recently, he will >> _not_stop_developping_VO32. >> >> Erik >> >
From: Geoff Schaller on 4 Oct 2006 07:16 I'm not with you Phil. Who is asking the question? And why? "Sherlock" <sherlock(a)sherlock.com.au> wrote in message news:1159960306.498049.126580(a)i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: > Geoff > > snip[ So this means that GrafX will be continuing two separate VO > development streams: a Win32 and a Dot Net version. ] > > If its financial why not ? > > Phil McGuinness > -----------------------
From: Geoff Schaller on 4 Oct 2006 07:18
Way out, Phil. Referring to a post 3 days ago. Guess your brain doesn't go back that far <g>. Keep wriggling - but hey, you might be right. Brian is commenting. (By the way, I wasn't the only one to notice) "Sherlock" <sherlock(a)sherlock.com.au> wrote in message news:1159960049.989355.237040(a)h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com: > Geoff, > > Again you quote misinformation..... this is what I said exactly > > SNIP[ [Steve and I do almost 100% of coding VO each day. Others to > differing > degrees have to maintain a code base. To me VO2.8 is probably the end > of > the line for VO] > > Note that it says "TO ME VO2,8 is probably the end of the line for VO". > This saids TO ME.. and my opinion it serves and completes my needs > and requirements for WIN32 compiler and the future for me and my team > will be .NET and PHP. > > Don't try add some twist to this statement and add all your spin that > this was Brian semi authorised statement. > > Phil McGuinness > ----------------- |