From: Free Lunch on 2 Jul 2008 18:44 On 02 Jul 2008 07:19:34 GMT, in alt.atheism "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic(a)aon.at> wrote in <486b2c04$0$2136$91cee783(a)newsreader02.highway.telekom.at>: >Free Lunch wrote: > >> When did Mr. Winn start to seek the truth? All he does is sell lies, >> he has never shown any interest in learning anything. > >It seems you have experience with that ;-) Yes, I unwisely let him suck me into the discussion, even though I could write his disingenuous responses each time.
From: Free Lunch on 2 Jul 2008 18:46 On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 22:35:31 -0700 (PDT), in alt.atheism rbwinn <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote in <17a7e2eb-2872-444b-bee0-d83c470d551b(a)b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>: >On Jul 1, 7:08?pm, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: >> On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 18:14:36 -0700 (PDT), in alt.atheism >> rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in >> <f9708904-6500-4209-b487-ab99be5d1...(a)r66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>: >> >> >> >> >> >> >On Jul 1, 1:07?pm, raven1 <quoththera...(a)nevermore.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 00:17:22 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >On Jun 30, 3:58?pm, raven1 <quoththera...(a)nevermore.com> wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 00:06:02 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >On Jun 29, 4:12?pm, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 15:23:58 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> >> >> >> >> wrote in alt.atheism: >> >> >> >> >> >On Jun 29, 7:07?am, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 07:06:07 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> >> >> >> >> >> wrote in alt.atheism: >> >> >> >> >> ... >> >> >> >> >> >> >I did not lie. ?There actually is a conduit for water between Gihon >> >> >> >> >> >spring and the pool of Siloam. >> >> >> >> >> >> And, as you know, that is not the lie I have pointed out to you. You lie >> >> >> >> >> here by falsely and intentionally trying to distract us from the lie >> >> >> >> >> under discussion. You know that no one imposes abortion in the United >> >> >> >> >> States. That is another in a long line of lies that you refuse to repent >> >> >> >> >> of.- Hide quoted text - >> >> >> >> >> >> - Show quoted text - >> >> >> >> >> >The Supreme Court and other atheists imposed abortion on the United >> >> >> >> >States. >> >> >> >> >> Abortion is not imposed. You know that. No one is ever forced to have an >> >> >> >> abortion by our government. Stop lying to us. >> >> >> >> >Women have been forced to have abortions in order to get welfare >> >> >> >assistance. >> >> >> >> Bullshit. Citation, please. >> >> >> >And our government still recognizes our right to trial by jury, >> >> >right? >> >> >> Nice attempt at distraction, but completely irrelevant. This has >> >> absolutely nothing to do with women being forced to have abortions in >> >> order to get welfare assistance. Which is still a completely bogus >> >> claim on your part. >> >> >> > How gullible do you think I am about "our government"? ?Or >> >> >maybe you are just including atheists when you say "our government". >> >> >> I didn't say you were gullible, I said you were lying. Your pathetic >> >> attempt to change the subject, rather than support your claim, just >> >> confirms my assessment.- Hide quoted text - >> >> >> - Show quoted text - >> >> >I personally know one woman who was subjected to governmental >> >reproduction control. >> >> Back up your defamatory claim with some evidence. > >Why? Am I supposed to care whether you believe what I say? You are supposed to care what you say. You have demonstrated that you do not, that you will tell any lie you feel like if it 'helps' your 'argument'. You are a fool.
From: Free Lunch on 2 Jul 2008 18:49 On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 05:35:47 -0700 (PDT), in alt.atheism rbwinn <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote in <bba5d2a6-f5dd-4c32-a614-5dc2f685799d(a)x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>: >On Jul 1, 8:49?pm, raven1 <quoththera...(a)nevermore.com> wrote: >> On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 18:14:36 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >On Jul 1, 1:07?pm, raven1 <quoththera...(a)nevermore.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 00:17:22 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >On Jun 30, 3:58?pm, raven1 <quoththera...(a)nevermore.com> wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 00:06:02 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >On Jun 29, 4:12?pm, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 15:23:58 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> >> >> >> >> wrote in alt.atheism: >> >> >> >> >> >On Jun 29, 7:07?am, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 07:06:07 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> >> >> >> >> >> wrote in alt.atheism: >> >> >> >> >> ... >> >> >> >> >> >> >I did not lie. ?There actually is a conduit for water between Gihon >> >> >> >> >> >spring and the pool of Siloam. >> >> >> >> >> >> And, as you know, that is not the lie I have pointed out to you. You lie >> >> >> >> >> here by falsely and intentionally trying to distract us from the lie >> >> >> >> >> under discussion. You know that no one imposes abortion in the United >> >> >> >> >> States. That is another in a long line of lies that you refuse to repent >> >> >> >> >> of.- Hide quoted text - >> >> >> >> >> >> - Show quoted text - >> >> >> >> >> >The Supreme Court and other atheists imposed abortion on the United >> >> >> >> >States. >> >> >> >> >> Abortion is not imposed. You know that. No one is ever forced to have an >> >> >> >> abortion by our government. Stop lying to us. >> >> >> >> >Women have been forced to have abortions in order to get welfare >> >> >> >assistance. >> >> >> >> Bullshit. Citation, please. >> >> >> >And our government still recognizes our right to trial by jury, >> >> >right? >> >> >> Nice attempt at distraction, but completely irrelevant. This has >> >> absolutely nothing to do with women being forced to have abortions in >> >> order to get welfare assistance. Which is still a completely bogus >> >> claim on your part. >> >> >> > How gullible do you think I am about "our government"? ?Or >> >> >maybe you are just including atheists when you say "our government". >> >> >> I didn't say you were gullible, I said you were lying. Your pathetic >> >> attempt to change the subject, rather than support your claim, just >> >> confirms my assessment. >> >I personally know one woman who was subjected to governmental >> >reproduction control. >> >> Was she Chinese? Seriously, put up, or shut up. You made a claim; now >> either back it up or retract it.- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > >Do atheists have some special program for Chinese women in the United >States? We know they do in China. However, there are a lot of women >in the United States you do not even seem to consider, women in mental >institutions, women in prisons, etc., but the one I know personally >was just a woman who applied for welfare assistance. You have, through your history of repeatedly lying, given us a great deal of reason to believe you are lying to us. Since you refuse to back up your claim, I see no reason to believe you. Too bad you have developed such a reputation as a liar.
From: Free Lunch on 2 Jul 2008 18:52 On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 22:09:27 -0700 (PDT), in alt.atheism rbwinn <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote in <def5ff89-0d1a-4356-89c2-7e8bc9929e64(a)59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>: >On Jul 1, 5:00?pm, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: >> On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 07:27:47 -0700 (PDT), in alt.atheism >> rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in >> <6ec0a32a-3255-47d6-b573-5ace27ba6...(a)26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com>:>On Jul 1, 12:29?am, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: >> >> rbwinn wrote: >> >> ... >> >> >> > No, you didn't. ?I told you from the beginning that I was a Vietnam >> >> > veteran. >> >> >> Did you? I don't remember it. >> >> >> Your record of lying has not served you well, it was an honestly-held >> >> suspicion. I have been corrected. See how easy it is to admit that I was >> >> wrong? >> >> >How do you know I was telling the truth about being a Vietnam >> >veteran? ?Do you see how you are getting onto shaky ground here? >> >> We don't. We also know that you lie to us all the time. Still, it >> doesn't matter in this discussion whether you have lied to us about your >> service in Vietnam or not. Do you have PTSD? > >What they accused me of was paranoid schizophrenia. At the time I did >not pay much attention to it until they started to try to kill me with >tranquilizers. That must have been a long time ago. Tranquilizers haven't been used for schizophrenia for decades. > The reason why I still talk to atheists is because >they act exactly like people who work in psychiatry. So you claim. I suspect that you would rather be insulted than ignored. >They are people who hate me for no reason at all. That is behavior >that seems very strange to me. None of us hate you for no reason.
From: Free Lunch on 2 Jul 2008 18:53
On 02 Jul 2008 21:04:24 GMT, in alt.atheism "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic(a)aon.at> wrote in <486bed58$0$2153$91cee783(a)newsreader02.highway.telekom.at>: >rbwinn wrote: > >> Actions sometimes speak louder than words. >> Robert B. Winn > >]marvelous[ A graduate course in irony. |