Does God need to prove He exists?
in [Physics]
|
From: BuddyThunder on 2 Jul 2008 18:30 Steve O wrote: > > > "BuddyThunder" <nospam(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote in message > news:486b286c$1(a)clear.net.nz... > >> >> To quote Radiohead: Where do we go from here? > > Wasn't that Haircut 100?? > Actually, I think we're both right. ;-) > > Oops! > Hang on - you're right and I'm almost right. ;-) > > http://www.stlyrics.com/lyrics/coldfeet/loveplusone.htm > > http://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/radiohead/thebends.html So close! St. Lyrics? Heh, cute.
From: Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al) on 2 Jul 2008 18:31 On Jul 2, 11:19 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: > On Jul 2, 12:07 am, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: > > > > > rbwinn wrote: > > > On Jul 1, 1:13�pm, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: > > >> rbwinn wrote: > > > >>>> atheists.- Hide quoted text - > > >>>> - Show quoted text - > > >>> Well, I am sure you will not. �What would their reaction be to > > >>> discover that the apostle Paul had identified the theory of evolution > > >>> as a fable? > > >> They would accuse you of lying too. It's the only sensible reaction to > > >> your lies.- Hide quoted text - > > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > > Well, I think that is exactly right. Atheists accuse anyone who > > > disagrees with their atheistic doctrines of lying. > > > Not so much. I will call someone a liar when they lie to me. Call me old > > fashioned. Like that time you told me that I didn't believe in the > > tunnel. That was a lie. Or where you said that a post was made up-thread > > claiming that nothing in the Bible was true. Another lie. Need I continue?- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Well, it may be that you do believe in the tunnel, but if it was to > the advantage of atheists to deny its existence, then you would say it > does not exist. The tunnel does not present that kind of opportunity > because it is well documented, so you pretend that it exists but does > not mean anything. You do not need to continue. I would personally > like to see you just talk to other atheists. But I think you will > continue to post to me. > Robert B. Winn When you stop posting lies to alt.atheism, we'll stop posting back that you're lying. It's that simple. Al
From: BuddyThunder on 2 Jul 2008 18:33 Daniel Mandic wrote: > rbwinn wrote: > >> Only atheists seem to consistently believe something different. >> Robert B. Winn > > tic-tac (tactic) Well, we don't have a centralised organisation telling us what to believe. We have to reach our own conclusions and values based on the information we have to hand. Consequently, we hold a variety of opinions. We're each responsible for our own conclusions, just as it should be. It is a tactic, for developing a set of tools allowing us to appropriately deal with the world.
From: BuddyThunder on 2 Jul 2008 18:36 Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al) wrote: > On Jul 2, 9:32 pm, "Alex W." <ing...(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> "BuddyThunder" <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote in message >> >> news:486b29ee$1(a)clear.net.nz... >> >>> Hello? ... Hello? Paul? ..... hel-lo? ......... >> Yes, Ringo, what is it? > > Someone stole me wife. And a big chunk o money. Ye don't appen to > know where it went to do ya? > All I got is this ere plastic leg. Very peculiar. Yep, once she got a foot in the door...
From: Daniel Mandic on 2 Jul 2008 18:39
BuddyThunder wrote: > Well, we don't have a centralised organisation telling us what to > believe. We have to reach our own conclusions and values based on the > information we have to hand. Consequently, we hold a variety of > opinions. We're each responsible for our own conclusions, just as it > should be. > > It is a tactic, for developing a set of tools allowing us to > appropriately deal with the world. Well spoken.... but i would suggest you to not remind religion anymore.... otherwise you are seemingly ok Best regards, Daniel Mandic p.S.: I don't remind atheists when writing about god..... good Luck! -- |