Does God need to prove He exists?
in [Physics]
|
From: Alex W. on 20 Jul 2008 19:09 "BuddyThunder" <nospam(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote in message news:488398e8$1(a)clear.net.nz... > rbwinn wrote: >> So you are saying that the atheistic rulers of China do not try to >> control the population of China by limiting reproduction to one child >> per couple? Now we have the same kind of government here in the >> United States in which the atheistic members of the Supreme Court can >> begin to limit reproduction in the United States. That is one reason >> why atheists have begun to promote homosexuality. They see it as a >> means of limiting and controlling population. > > You're sounding goofy again. "again"?
From: Alex W. on 20 Jul 2008 19:14 "rbwinn" <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote in message news:687ca38c-4867-4462-a5df-6aa3d37abc66(a)c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com... On Jul 20, 9:59?am, "Alex W." <ing...(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message > > news:85ce5d7c-67c2-4090-8fd1-14d9b48f203d(a)34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com... > > ?There are only two commandments in the Law of Christ: > Love the Lord thy God, Love thy neighbor as thyself. > > ======== > > Sorry, but I draw the line at giving my neighbour hand jobs. > (as he will no doubt be relieved to hear). Anyone who engages in homosexuality does not love the other person, since he is contributing to that person's damnation. ============== Sorry, but Jesus tells us otherwise. So did you, in fact. Or are you now telling me that I cannot trust your expert opinion?
From: Free Lunch on 20 Jul 2008 19:53 On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:57:06 -0700, DanielSan <danielsan(a)speakeasy.net> wrote in alt.atheism: >rbwinn wrote: >> On Jul 20, 10:18 am, DanielSan <daniel...(a)speakeasy.net> wrote: .... >>> So, Jesus didn't say it. >>> >> Paul said it. He was one of the twelve apostles. > >So, Jesus didn't say it. And, as we all know, Paul was not one of the Twelve.
From: Free Lunch on 20 Jul 2008 19:53 On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 15:06:53 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote in alt.atheism: >On Jul 20, 10:41?am, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: >> On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 10:14:58 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> >> wrote in alt.atheism: >> >> ... >> >> >Paul was an apostle, and whatever he said comes under the instruction >> >by Christ, Whether by my voice or the voice of my servants, it is the >> >same. >> >> But there is no evidence that Paul was a servant of God. That claim is >> completely unsubstantiated. > >Paul was an apostle. He was called to that calling when James was >killed by Herod. You failed New Testament.
From: Stan-O on 20 Jul 2008 21:36
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:37:19 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote: >> > No, it does not. �The right to trial by jury no longer exists. >> >> Eh, wha? �Article 3 of the United States Constitution was repealed? >> >> > �People >> > who commit crimes serious enough to be profitable to lawyers are given >> > the privilege of trial by jury. � That means if you commit a murder, >> > you can have a lawyer and a trial by jury. �If you are arrested on >> > misdemeanor charges by police who have decided to harrass you, you >> > cannot get a trial by jury even though the Constitution guarantees you >> > that right. >> >> Um, no. �You might want to look up the difference between criminal and >> civil charges... >> >> -- >I do not need to look anything up. <snip> ....and you sit there, drooling on your keyboard, wondering why no one takes you seriously. |