Does God need to prove He exists?
in [Physics]
|
From: rbwinn on 30 Jul 2008 21:02 On Jul 30, 5:25�pm, "Smiler" <Smi...(a)Joe.King.com> wrote: > "Stan-O" <bndsna...(a)aol.com> wrote in message > > news:1kq1949f2u711u1qt1tjv30s5snpkkeakq(a)4ax.com... > > > > > > > On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 05:57:16 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> > > wrote: > > >>> It's more than likely that Robbie exists on the fringes of the mental > >>> health > >>> service, not quite crazy enough to be sectioned and sane enough to live > >>> ?in > >>> society. > >>> There are plenty of people like him. > >>> I quite often have to deal with the mentally ill, and it constantly > >>> surprises me how ill they have to be before the hospitals will take them > >>> in. > > >>> -- > >>> Steve O > >>> a.a. #2240 (Apatheist Chapter) > >>> B.A.A.W.A. > >>> Convicted by Earthquack > >>> Exempt from purgatory by papal indulgence- Hide quoted text - > > >>> - Show quoted text - > > >>Well, with regard to that, psychiatrists only treat patients who are > >>financially profitable to them. �That makes psychiatrists among the > >>most useless people on earth, along with lawyers. > > > Slyly, Robert tries to change the subject... > > A common ploy by the mentally ill. > What Skippy doesn't know is that "Sectioned" refers to Section 2 of the UK > Mental Health Act and that, in the UK, psychiatrists get paid the same > amount for each and every patient they see under the NHS. > > Smiler, Well, that is socialized medicine. Here in the United States, psychiatrists get paid more than $100.00 per hour by rich people who pay them to do their thinking. Robert B. Winn
From: DanielSan on 30 Jul 2008 21:04 rbwinn wrote: > On Jul 30, 3:40�pm, Stan-O <bndsna...(a)aol.com> wrote: >> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:42:53 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> >> wrote: >> >>>>>>> Under World Communism one of the pre-requisites for being a dictator >>>>>>> was being an atheist. >>>>>> Why? >>>>> Because Karl Marx said that religion was the opiate of the people. >>>>> Religious people were not allowed to be Communist dictators. >>>> ...and to think that Marx himself was Jewish...- Hide quoted text - >>>> - Show quoted text - >>> Marx said that he was an atheist. �How is it that now that Communism >>> has failed, all of these Communist icons are suddenly religious men? >> Because you read filtered propaganda instead of doing any research >> into their backgrounds. > > Well, I knew that Karl Marx was born to a Jewish family and became an > atheist. I knew that Josef Stalin was born into a Russian Orthodox > family and became an atheist. Those are just facts. So how do > atheists of today hope to change the facts by claiming that these two > individuals were religious men? So, you believe Marx and Stalin when they claimed to be atheists? -- ****************************************************** * DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 * *----------------------------------------------------* * "I distrust those people who know so well what God * * wants them to do because I notice it always * * coincides with their own desires." * * --Susan B. Anthony * ******************************************************
From: Free Lunch on 30 Jul 2008 21:07 On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:57:19 -0700 (PDT), in alt.atheism rbwinn <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote in <4937d184-9c40-4146-a3bb-b72b0333d3df(a)z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>: >On Jul 30, 3:43?pm, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: >> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:46:16 -0700 (PDT), in alt.atheism >> rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in >> <5756c0f4-924c-42b6-b121-8d1294e14...(a)m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>: >> >> >> >> >> >> >On Jul 22, 4:36?am, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: >> >> On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:27:01 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> >> >> wrote in alt.atheism: >> >> >> >On Jul 21, 6:51?pm, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:58:47 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> >> >> >> wrote in alt.atheism: >> >> >> >> >On Jul 21, 5:15?pm, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 06:27:20 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> >> >> >> >> wrote in alt.atheism: >> >> >> >> >> >On Jul 20, 4:53?pm, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:57:06 -0700, DanielSan <daniel...(a)speakeasy.net> >> >> >> >> >> wrote in alt.atheism: >> >> >> >> >> >> >rbwinn wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> On Jul 20, 10:18 am, DanielSan <daniel...(a)speakeasy.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> ... >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> So, Jesus didn't say it. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Paul said it. ?He was one of the twelve apostles. >> >> >> >> >> >> >So, Jesus didn't say it. >> >> >> >> >> >> And, as we all know, Paul was not one of the Twelve. >> >> >> >> >> >Well, if you doubt that Paul was one of the twelve, why don't you wait >> >> >> >> >until after you are resurrected and ask Paul if he was one of the >> >> >> >> >twelve? >> >> >> >> >> You are really ignorant about the Bible. No wonder you insist on making >> >> >> >> a fool of yourself. >> >> >> >> >> Clue. Even Paul tells us he wasn't one of the Twelve. >> >> >> >> >> If there were a God, He would strike you down for being such a bad >> >> >> >> example.- Hide quoted text - >> >> >> >> >> - Show quoted text - >> >> >> >> >The book of Acts says Paul was ordained an apostle, Paul says he is an >> >> >> >apostle. ?Paul was an apostle, regardless of how many atheists of >> >> >> >today say he was not. >> >> >> >> Once again, you choose to lie rather than admit your error. Nowhere in >> >> >> the entire Bible does it say that Paul was one of the Twelve. That was a >> >> >> claim you made up that was not true. >> >> >> >> Keep lying. Prove to us how much of a fake you are.- Hide quoted text - >> >> >> >> - Show quoted text - >> >> >> >Acts 14:14 ?Which when the apostles, Barnabas and Paul, heard of, they >> >> >rent their clothes, and ran in among the people crying out. >> >> >> So, as you can see, apostle does not mean 'one of the Twelve'. >> >> >> Please, learn the myths you are trying to sell us. Your god would be >> >> embarrassed by your ignorance if he existed.- Hide quoted text - >> >> >> - Show quoted text - >> >> >Well, yes it does mean ?one of the Twelve. >> >> Then you clearly have no idea what you are talking about. Go waste some >> time reading the Gospels, Acts and letters to find out that _no one_ >> thought that Paul was one of the Twelve.- Hide quoted text - >> >Well, Paul thought he was. I don't think he would have gone around >lying about it. You are lying about what Paul said. He never claimed to be one of the Twelve.
From: Smiler on 30 Jul 2008 21:09 "rbwinn" <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote in message news:6810c7b2-5cf5-4cc6-ad98-521bc456a6ea(a)f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com... On Jul 22, 10:05?am, "Steve O" <nospamh...(a)thanks.com> wrote: > "The Chief Instigator" <patr...(a)io.com> wrote in > messagenews:szkk5feb05l.fsf(a)eris.io.com... > > > rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> writes: > > >> God sent His Only Begotten Son, Steve. ?If that was not enough for > >> you, nothing I could do or say is going to convince you of anything. > > > Sacre m?rde...this supposed god sent Steve? ?Funny, how your holy book > > has > > been in error for only a couple of thousand years... > > LOL! > I missed that one - thanks for pointing it out. > I knew I'd been put here for a higher purpose!! > > -- > Steve O > a.a. #2240 (Apatheist Chapter) > B.A.A.W.A. > Convicted by Earthquack > Exempt from purgatory by papal indulgence See? I warned Humphries about this. He created a false Christ by his untruth. ============================ Exactly like the bible writers did. Smiler, The godless one a.a.# 2279
From: Free Lunch on 30 Jul 2008 21:10
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:58:30 -0700 (PDT), in alt.atheism rbwinn <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote in <0c7d7cdb-90be-40cf-a18c-55fa97ace905(a)79g2000hsk.googlegroups.com>: >On Jul 30, 3:44?pm, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: >> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 05:40:51 -0700 (PDT), in alt.atheism >> rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in >> <cb9ee3fe-fdd0-40d8-83e5-146ccf9b7...(a)b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>: .... >> >Paul was one of the twelve. ?He was ordained when James the son of >> >Zebedee was killed by Herod. ?The apostles kept the quorum at twelve >> >until Peter was crucified in Rome, then one by one all of the apostles >> >were killed. ?You are claiming that because some translators misused >> >the term apostle that the apostles would have been controlled by that >> >future mis-translation. ?It does not work that way, just as the >> >disbelief of atheists today did not control the existence of Jesus >> >Christ. >> >Robert B. Winn >> >> Feel free to back up your ahistorical claim with real evidence or even >> the story line from the New Testament.- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > >Well, I think we should wait until the resurrection and ask Paul about >it. >Robert B. Winn You know that there is no evidence that there will be a resurrection, so it appears that you are telling lies to us to avoid admitting your errors. |