Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: JoeBloe on 8 Oct 2006 16:17 On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 19:15:36 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > > >Daniel Mandic wrote: > >> You are more stupid than the Moon is shining from its Dark Side. >> (Mandic TM) > >Some of your phrases really crack me up ! > On top of that, the idiot actually thinks that "TM" means something!
From: Frank Bemelman on 8 Oct 2006 16:41 "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> schreef in bericht news:45295B99.E1C24B2(a)hotmail.com... > > He assuredly is along with anyone else who believes in this phantom > menace. That was a nice entertaining US movie: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120915/ -- Thanks, Frank. (remove 'q' and '.invalid' when replying by email)
From: T Wake on 8 Oct 2006 17:57 "John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message news:gliii2ll2sc4tst6g5n2hf1h5dcjk6tkue(a)4ax.com... > On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 18:57:00 +0100, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >>> If you had your way, everybody would convert to Islam. OK. >>> Assume that. >> >>Let's not assume that at all. >> >>No-one going to convert to Islam here under duress. How daft can you be to >>even >>imagine such a thing ? >> >> >>> Since the factions are already killing each >>> other, what makes you think that they will stop killing and >>> murdering and destroying all infrastructure? The goal >>> is to destroy Western infrastructure. This means bridges, >>> roads, computers, any science results and their applications, >>> white collar jobs, blue collar jobs, manufacturing plants, >>> food processing plants, etc. >> >>No it isn't. You're utterly mad. > > --- > That doesn't mean he's wrong, though. > She was though.
From: T Wake on 8 Oct 2006 17:59 "John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message news:ofkii2tjdo5nh3pd3n26rrcn2idqgnd224(a)4ax.com... > On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 18:57:54 +0100, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >>John Larkin wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 06 Oct 06 11:26:29 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >>> >>Our freedoms are under threat as a result of American stupidity. >>> > >>> >Now I understand you. It is not Bin Laden's fault that he >>> >is going to kill a lot of people. It's the Americans' fault >>> >that caused Islamic extremists to want to destroy Western >>> >civilization. >>> >>> That's actually true. "American" culture, which is actually world >>> culture, is the thing they fear will seduce their sons and liberate >>> their daughters. As it must. >> >>You flatter yourself about the impact of American 'culture'. > > Did I flatter myself? I hadn't noticed. > > As I said - perhaps you missed it - that American culture is in fact > world culture. Most anything that's fun to read, listen to, or eat > gets enthusiastically absorbed and amplified here, from Nepalese food > to AfroPop to Irish folk music. We are more an intersection of > cultures than a driver, although we do make our occasional donations > to the pool. This world culture is what many regionalists fear will > destroy their own culture - as it will - and many call it "American", > which it really isn't. > > When I was in Japan, I was appalled at how much they were trying to be > Western at the expense of their own very beautiful culture. They think > that bad English signage is cool, and that bad French fashion is > elegant. Imagine a men's toilet in a fancy hotel, with the walls > entirely done in YSL-monogrammed ceramic tiles. To be honest I had read your post as saying American culture was a collection of world cultures, not that American culture was world dominant. Not everyone seems to have done the same and I may have been mistaken.
From: T Wake on 8 Oct 2006 18:00
"John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message news:mujii25168dj6fm841h5qqvck8bdva1fb7(a)4ax.com... > On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 19:11:51 +0100, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >>John Fields wrote: >> >>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >The only thing that worries me about the 'state of the world' is what >>> >idiocy America's up to next. >>> >>> --- >>> Bullshit. >>> >>> All you're trying to do is avoid having to account for yourself in a >>> way which won't cast you in a bad light. >>> >>> How much do you weigh? >>> >>> How much do you make? >>> >>> How much do you laugh? >>> >>> Who would you like to see dead? >>> >>> Are you willing to answer even just _one_ of the questions? >> >>Why the heck should I ? What's it got to do with anything ? What gives you >>the >>idea you even have any right to ask such intrusive questions ? > > --- > I have the right to ask anything I want to, just as you have the > right to be devious. Is refusing to answer being devious? |