Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Daniel Mandic on 8 Oct 2006 18:45 JoeBloe wrote: > >> You are more stupid than the Moon is shining from its Dark Side. > >> (Mandic TM) > > > > Some of your phrases really crack me up ! > > > > On top of that, the idiot actually thinks that "TM" means something! yes, it means Trademark. I have traded between my two brain-halves, till I had the right fitting sentence describing you, marked here in SED. So it is actually a traded mark. GING!!!! Auction is over! Best Regards, Daniel Mandic
From: Eeyore on 8 Oct 2006 19:05 T Wake wrote: > "John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote > > > Why assume bombs will be the weapons? > > I didn't make that assumption. I was detailing the possible threat delivery > systems which could have been in place. As you can see I also mentioned that > ASMs are very efficient at hitting ships. > > Having said that, the aircraft was flying level which is generally a sign of > a bombing run. Actually, the Vincennes thought they were diving IIRC. Graham
From: Eeyore on 8 Oct 2006 19:14 John Fields wrote: > If my family was on that plane, I'd be filing a very big lawsuit > against the airline for the pilot's irresponsibility What irresponsibilty ? He was doing his job correctly. > being the > reason members of my family were killed. You're utterly mad. I have difficulty believing.you can be serious. If you are serious you're actually quite deranged IMHO. The families did eventually bring a lawsuit against the US Govt. " On February 22, 1996 the United States agreed to pay Iran US$ 61.8 million in compensation ($300,000 per wage-earning victim, $150,000 per non-wage-earner) for the 248 Iranians killed in the shootdown, but not for the aircraft, which was estimated to be worth approximately US$30 million. This was an agreed settlement to discontinue a case brought by Iran in 1989 against the U.S. in the International Court of Justice.[12] The payment of compensation was explicitly characterised by the US as being on an ex gratia basis, and the U.S. denied having any responsibility or liability for the incident. " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_Air_Flight_655#Compensation Graham
From: Ken Smith on 8 Oct 2006 19:18 In article <05cii2p4fh1u08166gal2omfh5t8tasdc1(a)4ax.com>, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >On Sun, 8 Oct 2006 09:37:07 -0400, krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote: > >> >>Nice _guesses_, but how is that relevant? How many died in car >>accidents? How many from cancer? How is throwing Foley in the can >>(which is where he should be) help your 88,000? > >I don't think Foley actually commited a crime. It also appears that he did text messaged some that were under the legal age at the time of the first message. I believe that the actual physical contact did not happen until the page was of legal age. -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge
From: John Larkin on 8 Oct 2006 19:20
On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 20:29:08 GMT, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >Veil seeking missiles serve 2 things: >1) The fear for them will keep the veils away and preserve our society. >2) It will keep the veils away and preserve our society. > Do you really think that women wearing veils is a threat to your society? How fragile that sounds. John |