Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Frithiof Andreas Jensen on 9 Oct 2006 05:09 "John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message news:iq1ji2t66ov05f69i8oamaop8nq107jigb(a)4ax.com... > On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 20:29:08 GMT, Jan Panteltje > <pNaonStpealmtje(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > >Veil seeking missiles serve 2 things: > >1) The fear for them will keep the veils away and preserve our society. > >2) It will keep the veils away and preserve our society. > > > > Do you really think that women wearing veils is a threat to your > society? How fragile that sounds. In much the same way that skinheads wearing "hagen-kreutz" are - the wearers boldly avertise that they are outsiders that want a different society where the outsider-norms are the rule.
From: Eeyore on 9 Oct 2006 05:45 "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: > Daniel Mandic wrote: > > > > Eeyore wrote: > > > > > Better quality foods ? Stuff like modern hydrogenated fats actually > > > *shortens* lives ! What a ridiculous idea. > > > > > > Graham > > > > Yes. Ppl become also old in the old time, or medieval. 80 and more. > > Of course, mainly by the richer one. > > > > Some distressing worldwide is welcomely awaited by me. > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Daniel Mandic > > So, the "Demented Donkey" equates hydrogenated oils with Quality? No > wonder people think that he's brain dead. :( > > Quality foods aren't cheap, and use better ingredients. In what way has food changed since say 200 yrs ago other than to introduce synthesised stuff ? Graham
From: Eeyore on 9 Oct 2006 05:46 lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: > "John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message > >Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > >>Veil seeking missiles serve 2 things: > >>1) The fear for them will keep the veils away and preserve our society. > >>2) It will keep the veils away and preserve our society. > >> > > > > Do you really think that women wearing veils is a threat to your > > society? How fragile that sounds. > > And yet, it is no stranger than assuming that Islam wants to destroy our > society. I can't fathom what he's going on about. Graham
From: jmfbahciv on 9 Oct 2006 06:30 In article <GbqdnS_iQ86RYrXYnZ2dnUVZ8t2dnZ2d(a)pipex.net>, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >news:egaj6a$8qk_003(a)s779.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >> In article <Ke2dncVNEMkPSLXYRVnysw(a)pipex.net>, >> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >>> >>><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>>news:egagl2$8ss_007(a)s779.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >>>> In article <5puVg.13906$7I1.7983(a)newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>, >>>> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>>>>news:eg5eir$8qk_010(a)s831.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >>>>>> In article <4526343A.24C8CC03(a)hotmail.com>, >>>>>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ISTR that Bin Laden's next goal is to kill 3 million people >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Cite ? >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't have one since I can't access the web. >>>>> >>>>>That's a copout. How about any recollection at all of where you saw it, >>>>>so >>>>>others can try to verify? >>>> >>>> The time was around 2004. It was a site that translates that >>>> news issued in Arabian. The essay counted 3,000,000 Arabs >>>> who had been killed by the US since 1500s and 3 million >>>> Americans would have to die to make things equal. >>> >>>I doubt this could be described as an authoritative news source, any more >>>than USENET can be described as an authoritative description of US >>>government policy. >> >> Why do I have to produce the person and the words at the time >> they were made > >You dont. I didn't ask you to. > >I simply pointed out there is an error in assuming all the posts made on >websites by Jihadists represent a genuine mindset. > >If I come across a website with an essay from a Christian explaining how all >Muslims should be killed to make the world safer, am I to assume that is an >authorative viewpoint? If the authors were responsible for the World Trade Towers' destruction and other messes, yes. > >> but you can use any random sound extraction >> from any Democrat who is desperately trying to win the election >> in four weeks? > >When have I done this? If I have it wasn't intentional and I apologise. > >Even if I have done this though, how does that invalidate what I said? Because these Democrats are purposely ignoring a national threat. If you keep repeating and believing that they are correct, then the mindset of those who intend to destroy Western civilization will simply keep doing their gnat attacks until a Democrat President is elected. Then, they conclude, based on past experience with Democrat Presidents, making new messes will not have serious retaliation from the US. They already know that Europe isn't going to do anything. Take a good look at what is happening in Afghanistan right now. The Taliban are testing NATO's backbone. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 9 Oct 2006 06:31
In article <452908D1.B1384AB1(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> ISTR that Bin Laden's next goal is to kill 3 million people >> >>> >> >>>Cite ? >> >> >> >> I don't have one since I can't access the web. >> > >> >That's a copout. How about any recollection at all of where you saw it, so >> >others can try to verify? >> >> The time was around 2004. It was a site that translates that >> news issued in Arabian. The essay counted 3,000,000 Arabs >> who had been killed by the US since 1500s and 3 million >> Americans would have to die to make things equal. > >You're saying that "a site" threatened 3 million Americans ? > >How feeble minded are you ? Fortunately, not as feeble as you are. /BAH |