Vulcan .Net and VO 2.8
in [Visual Objects]
|
From: Geoff Schaller on 21 Sep 2006 17:57 Patrick, Well, we'll have to agree to disagree but if you guys really think that way then you need to take a valium and have good lie down. You are taking things way too seriously and way too personally. Geoff
From: Geoff Schaller on 21 Sep 2006 18:10 > similarities happened to have trees of both of them. Name me one piece of > fruit that comes closes to an apple than a pear. A nashi of course. http://www.agric.nsw.gov.au/reader/pome-fruits/okusanki.htm It's a big industry here and very popular with the Japanese.
From: Geoff Schaller on 21 Sep 2006 18:15 Marc, Correct. Again the disappointing thing is how little new stuff is in 2.8 and little of the GUI classes are properly fixed. ...and how much of the promised things aren't there. A new editor is really just a fix for the old one (and an acknowledgment it couldn't be fixed) but for all that, it worked. Given our slow migration away from VO to C# I don't know yet whether it will be worth the upgrade money. I guess we will wait for reviews in here and certainly the first patch. There is always a patch - in fact there are always several <g>. Had there been more new stuff and more of the requested fixes my attitude might have been different. Geoff "Marc Verkade [Marti IT]" <marcatM(a)rtidotnl> wrote in message news:45128fe0$0$69153$58c7af7e(a)news.kabelfoon.nl: > Yes, > But an expectation was raised! > Grtz, Marc
From: Ginny Caughey on 21 Sep 2006 18:18 Geoff, The new editor alone is worth the upgrade to VO 2.8. You will like it, and especially since you don't have any plans to move your VO apps to .NET and will be maintaining them in VO. -- Ginny "Geoff Schaller" <geoff(a)xxxsoftwareobjectives.com.au> wrote in message news:45130ef7$1(a)dnews.tpgi.com.au... > Marc, > > Correct. Again the disappointing thing is how little new stuff is in 2.8 > and little of the GUI classes are properly fixed. ...and how much of the > promised things aren't there. A new editor is really just a fix for the > old one (and an acknowledgment it couldn't be fixed) but for all that, it > worked. Given our slow migration away from VO to C# I don't know yet > whether it will be worth the upgrade money. I guess we will wait for > reviews in here and certainly the first patch. There is always a patch - > in fact there are always several <g>. Had there been more new stuff and > more of the requested fixes my attitude might have been different. > > Geoff > > > "Marc Verkade [Marti IT]" <marcatM(a)rtidotnl> wrote in message > news:45128fe0$0$69153$58c7af7e(a)news.kabelfoon.nl: > >> Yes, >> But an expectation was raised! >> Grtz, Marc >
From: Geoff Schaller on 21 Sep 2006 18:20
Cool. "Patrick Vletter (Prive)" <NoWay(a)spam.org> wrote in message news:45130ca9$0$26435$e4fe514c(a)dreader17.news.xs4all.nl: > Hi Geoff, > > Ok. I'll give it another try: let's have a good discussion about this > concept and stay away from the drivel about VO, Vulcan and Grafx... > > For the sake of the length of this thread I'll start a new one named "To > convert or not to convert, that's the question". Please react to that one... > > CU > > Patrick |