Vulcan .Net and VO 2.8
in [Visual Objects]
|
From: asdf on 19 Sep 2006 16:59 Ok, thanks for the info :-) Mahanimann
From: rob on 19 Sep 2006 17:25 Marc, I don't candy coat anything. I have had so much frustration with VO and it drives me nuts when other VO evangelist (such as yourself) out here try to make excuse for Graphx short falls. Answer one simple question for me. What has Graphx provided for all non VOPS members in the past year? Cheers, Rob P.S. - My finger still hurts from "Flicking" VO to the side for NEW development. LOL!
From: Geoff Schaller on 19 Sep 2006 17:47 Rene, Vulcan is neither ready nor suitable for mobile development. Look up VS Standard (which you will have to purchase) for mobile development. Geoff "Rene J. Pajaron" <rjpajaron(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:1158674794.833881.199790(a)e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com: > Ginny, > > Thanks for the clarification. Anyway, is Vulcan ready or "suitable" or > whatever words for that, for mobile development? > > Rene
From: Geoff Schaller on 19 Sep 2006 18:04 Rene. > My money is now ready for VO 2.8 upgrade..... > And very soon.... i will try Vulcan as well Very soon? I think not <g>. However, the cheap way out is to buy one years subscription to VOPS so that you can get both versions for the same price. Otherwise you will have to pay for both. That isn't cheap. Geoff
From: Geoff Schaller on 19 Sep 2006 18:10
Heiko, There are a number of companies in Australia who share your experience. In many cases, the original interest was a desire to help fund the continuing development of VO32, in parallel with Vulcan. Alas most of the VO32 money was siphoned off into Vulcan VO32 languished. It is still languishing and the 2.8 releases have obviously not made an important impact or we would have heard about it. In fact, the only thing we have heard is that after Brian's announcement to the VOPS that there would only be the one release of VO 2.8 to the VOPS prior to official release that there were many subsequent builds <g>. It seems that things are still not very well in the VO32 camp. Geoff "Heiko Mueller" <hei_mue(a)web.de> wrote in message news:45103a2f$0$3797$9b622d9e(a)news.freenet.de: > Hi, > > this isn't really an answer to your question. But after a longer absence > from this newsgroup I've seen that the problems are the same as before. > Here are some words about my experiences with the VOPS (Platinum > Subscription): |