What do real scientist say about Abiogenesis:Alexandre Meinesz:
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Einstein...The Creationists' Friend.
Next: look upon 231! not as #rearrangements but as volume or time Chapt 19 #221 Atom Totality
From: Anna DeGanno on 16 Jul 2010 06:41 "Jason" <Jason(a)nospam.com> wrote in message news:Jason-1507101702370001(a)67-150-126-95.lsan.mdsg-pacwest.com... > In article <i1o1h3$eib$1(a)news.datemas.de>, "Anna DeGanno" <AD(a)invalid.com> > wrote: > >> "Jason" <Jason(a)nospam.com> wrote in message >> news:Jason-1507101421280001(a)66-53-215-33.lsan.mdsg-pacwest.com... >> > In article <SoidnSE-D7YixaLRnZ2dnUVZ_hKdnZ2d(a)giganews.com>, Ralph >> > <mmman_90(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> Here we go with the odds again. What are the odds that a god who is >> >> involved personally with everything on this paltry earth created the >> >> entire universe just for the fun of it. Why, I'll bet that they would >> >> be >> >> incalculable. >> > >> > I never stated that God created the entire universe just for the fun of >> > it. >> >> What other reason would a great all powerful and all knowing god have. >> >> > >> > > > For fellowship with mankind. But he/she/it doesn't "fellowship" with us. It fellowships, according to the bible, with angels and other heavenly "beings." What it has done in the past is murder human beings by the thousands, not fellowship with them. You need to think a little more before you reply to questions. Or perhaps actually read your bible cover to cover and trash the WTBTS rags and books. :)
From: Ben Kaufman on 16 Jul 2010 06:49 On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 20:13:16 -0700 (PDT), Joseki <jabriol2000(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On Jul 14, 11:04�pm, Mark K Bilbo <gm...(a)com.mkbilbo> wrote: > >> >> Life either came from non-life or life exists to the infinite past. >> >> So you insist the universe is infinitely old and life has always existed? >> >> > >You can't demonstrate one or they other... heres is another Option >Gazoo Farted and here we are. Hold up... you can't demonstrate that >one neither. Your Gazoo is already alive so you are not offering a competing process to abiogenesis.
From: Parish *~ on 16 Jul 2010 06:49 "Jason" <Jason(a)nospam.com> wrote in message news:Jason-1507102002470001(a)67-150-123-205.lsan.mdsg-pacwest.com... > > That is what lots of evolutionists believe but it does NOT mean that > evolutionists are 100% sure that it happened that way. I don't know of any "evolutionist" who believes a magical invisible god created that first life, the first living cell. Humans were created > by God. They share features with apes because God also created apes. So what's the connection? He was limited in the genetic material to work with? One > evolutionist tried to convince me that since apes and mankind are > similar--that means that one of mankind's ancestor was an ape-like > creature. My response was that since many larger warm blooded animals need > things like lungs, stomachs, veins, arteries, hearts, etc.--why not make > them similar in those creatures. Why should God have to develop or invent > special unique lungs, etc for mankind that were VASTLY different than > lungs, etc. that are in larger animals. Do you see my point? I see your point but it doesn't mean any gods were involved since life is so "faulty" as you must agree. The god would have had to be drunk or a sadist to create us as he did. And Geeze.... why would a god create disease organisms and parasites to make us suffer and die so horribly? -- The Parrish *~, American-American-American. * * * * * * "The Mass is the most perfect form of making money." * * * * * * * *
From: Joseki on 16 Jul 2010 11:15 On Jul 16, 6:49 am, Ben Kaufman <spaXm-mXe-anXd-paXy-5000- doll...(a)pobox.com> wrote: > On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 20:13:16 -0700 (PDT), Joseki <jabriol2...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >On Jul 14, 11:04 pm, Mark K Bilbo <gm...(a)com.mkbilbo> wrote: > > >> Life either came from non-life or life exists to the infinite past. > > >> So you insist the universe is infinitely old and life has always existed? > > >You can't demonstrate one or they other... heres is another Option > >Gazoo Farted and here we are. Hold up... you can't demonstrate that > >one neither. > > Your Gazoo is already alive so you are not offering a competing process to > abiogenesis. Interesting you said this. some of your thread colleagues said that God use abiogenesis to create life.
From: Jason on 16 Jul 2010 15:10
In article <i1pd0n$24s$1(a)news.datemas.de>, "Anna DeGanno" <AD(a)invalid.com> wrote: > "Jason" <Jason(a)nospam.com> wrote in message > news:Jason-1507101702370001(a)67-150-126-95.lsan.mdsg-pacwest.com... > > In article <i1o1h3$eib$1(a)news.datemas.de>, "Anna DeGanno" <AD(a)invalid.com> > > wrote: > > > >> "Jason" <Jason(a)nospam.com> wrote in message > >> news:Jason-1507101421280001(a)66-53-215-33.lsan.mdsg-pacwest.com... > >> > In article <SoidnSE-D7YixaLRnZ2dnUVZ_hKdnZ2d(a)giganews.com>, Ralph > >> > <mmman_90(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> >> Here we go with the odds again. What are the odds that a god who is > >> >> involved personally with everything on this paltry earth created the > >> >> entire universe just for the fun of it. Why, I'll bet that they would > >> >> be > >> >> incalculable. > >> > > >> > I never stated that God created the entire universe just for the fun of > >> > it. > >> > >> What other reason would a great all powerful and all knowing god have. > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > For fellowship with mankind. > > But he/she/it doesn't "fellowship" with us. It fellowships, according to > the bible, with angels and other heavenly "beings." What it has done in the > past is murder human beings by the thousands, not fellowship with them. You > need to think a little more before you reply to questions. Or perhaps > actually read your bible cover to cover and trash the WTBTS rags and books. > :) I disagree. There is lots of evidence in the Bible that God has fellowship with mankind. An example is the relationship God had with prophets, Moses, Joseph, John (the writer of the book of Revelations) etc. |