What do real scientist say about Abiogenesis:Alexandre Meinesz:
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Einstein...The Creationists' Friend.
Next: look upon 231! not as #rearrangements but as volume or time Chapt 19 #221 Atom Totality
From: Bob T. on 18 Jul 2010 08:57 On Jul 17, 5:24 pm, Ja...(a)nospam.com (Jason) wrote: > In article <w9ydnX1G7-YMi9_RnZ2dnUVZ_jmdn...(a)giganews.com>, Ralph > - > > > > That is what lots of evolutionists believe but it does NOT mean that > > > evolutionists are 100% sure that it happened that way. Humans were created > > > by God. > > > You are 100% sure of that. Can you base that on anything other than the > > bible? > > Mainly the Bible and my own opinions. I learned in biology classes how > complex mankind is--that led me to believe that God created mankind. There > is no way that mankind could have evolved from a one celled life form. But you don't know very much about biology, so why should anyone care what you think the subject? You just now admitted that your sources for the answers to scientific questions are the Bible and your own imagination - it's no wonder that you're completely wrong! For your information, Jason, you yourself used to be a one celled life form. Since then you have increased billions of times in size and dozens of times in intelligence. If that happened to you in a few short decades, how can you possible claim it's impossible for species to make that same change in billions of years? Oh, right - it contradicts Genesis, so you know it ain't true. - Bob T - Bob T > > > > > > > > They share features with apes because God also created apes. One > > > evolutionist tried to convince me that since apes and mankind are > > > similar--that means that one of mankind's ancestor was an ape-like > > > creature. My response was that since many larger warm blooded animals need > > > things like lungs, stomachs, veins, arteries, hearts, etc.--why not make > > > them similar in those creatures. Why should God have to develop or invent > > > special unique lungs, etc for mankind that were VASTLY different than > > > lungs, etc. that are in larger animals. Do you see my point? > > > Just the top of your head.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
From: Jason on 18 Jul 2010 15:48 > But you don't know very much about biology, so why should anyone care > what you think the subject? You just now admitted that your sources > for the answers to scientific questions are the Bible and your own > imagination - it's no wonder that you're completely wrong! > > For your information, Jason, you yourself used to be a one celled life > form. Since then you have increased billions of times in size and > dozens of times in intelligence. If that happened to you in a few > short decades, how can you possible claim it's impossible for species > to make that same change in billions of years? Oh, right - it > contradicts Genesis, so you know it ain't true. > > - Bob T Bob, Yes, you and I started out as a one celled life form. That's not an issue. The issue is that many of the advocates of abiogenesis believe that mankind evolved from a one celled life form. It did not happen that way. God created mankind and life on this planet. I proved in another post that some of the animals that develop harmful mutations continue to live and continue to reproduce. That's one of the reasons that mankind could not have evolved from a one celled life form. In other words, there would have been just as many harmful genetic mutations as there were beneficial genetic mutations.
From: Bob T. on 18 Jul 2010 16:20 On Jul 18, 12:48 pm, Ja...(a)nospam.com (Jason) wrote: > > But you don't know very much about biology, so why should anyone care > > what you think the subject? You just now admitted that your sources > > for the answers to scientific questions are the Bible and your own > > imagination - it's no wonder that you're completely wrong! > > > For your information, Jason, you yourself used to be a one celled life > > form. Since then you have increased billions of times in size and > > dozens of times in intelligence. If that happened to you in a few > > short decades, how can you possible claim it's impossible for species > > to make that same change in billions of years? Oh, right - it > > contradicts Genesis, so you know it ain't true. > > > - Bob T > > Bob, > Yes, you and I started out as a one celled life form. That's not an issue.. > The issue is that many of the advocates of abiogenesis believe that > mankind evolved from a one celled life form. Actually, that's not "abiogenesis", that's just evolution... and yes, everyone who understands biology knows that humans evolved from single- celled life-forms. > It did not happen that way. Yes, it did. > God created mankind and life on this planet. That may be, but if He did, He did so very slowly and evolved humans, hyenas, and hydrangreas from the same common ancestors. - Bob T > > I proved in another post that some of the animals that develop harmful > mutations continue to live and continue to reproduce. That's one of the > reasons that mankind could not have evolved from a one celled life form. > In other words, there would have been just as many harmful genetic > mutations as there were beneficial genetic mutations.
From: Jason on 18 Jul 2010 16:40 In article <ef5793ee-e12a-4893-81f6-e84b6819851b(a)p22g2000pre.googlegroups.com>, "Bob T." <bob(a)synapse-cs.com> wrote: > On Jul 18, 12:48=A0pm, Ja...(a)nospam.com (Jason) wrote: > > > But you don't know very much about biology, so why should anyone care > > > what you think the subject? =A0You just now admitted that your sources > > > for the answers to scientific questions are the Bible and your own > > > imagination - it's no wonder that you're completely wrong! > > > > > For your information, Jason, you yourself used to be a one celled life > > > form. =A0Since then you have increased billions of times in size and > > > dozens of times in intelligence. =A0If that happened to you in a few > > > short decades, how can you possible claim it's impossible for species > > > to make that same change in billions of years? =A0Oh, right - it > > > contradicts Genesis, so you know it ain't true. > > > > > - Bob T > > > > Bob, > > Yes, you and I started out as a one celled life form. That's not an issue= > . > > The issue is that many of the advocates of abiogenesis believe that > > mankind evolved from a one celled life form. > > Actually, that's not "abiogenesis", that's just evolution... and yes, > everyone who understands biology knows that humans evolved from single- > celled life-forms. That's not true. The professors that teach at the ICR college understand biology and even teach biology. They believe that God created life on this planet and humans did NOT evolve from single celled life forms. Believe it or not, not all college graduates that have taken college biology classes don't agree with you. They understand biology as much as evolutionists.
From: Free Lunch on 18 Jul 2010 16:47
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 12:48:48 -0700, Jason(a)nospam.com (Jason) wrote in alt.talk.creationism: > >> But you don't know very much about biology, so why should anyone care >> what you think the subject? You just now admitted that your sources >> for the answers to scientific questions are the Bible and your own >> imagination - it's no wonder that you're completely wrong! >> >> For your information, Jason, you yourself used to be a one celled life >> form. Since then you have increased billions of times in size and >> dozens of times in intelligence. If that happened to you in a few >> short decades, how can you possible claim it's impossible for species >> to make that same change in billions of years? Oh, right - it >> contradicts Genesis, so you know it ain't true. >> >> - Bob T > >Bob, >Yes, you and I started out as a one celled life form. That's not an issue. >The issue is that many of the advocates of abiogenesis believe that >mankind evolved from a one celled life form. It did not happen that way. >God created mankind and life on this planet. > >I proved in another post that some of the animals that develop harmful >mutations continue to live and continue to reproduce. That's one of the >reasons that mankind could not have evolved from a one celled life form. >In other words, there would have been just as many harmful genetic >mutations as there were beneficial genetic mutations. > You proved only that you don't understand biology, yet have the arrogance to claim that you know more than biologists. Stop worshipping your own ignorance. |