Does God need to prove He exists?
in [Physics]
|
From: Alex W. on 29 Jun 2008 21:58 "Free Lunch" <lunch(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote in message news:ej5g64psvc40o3fq3lpi12h4id0b8dskga(a)4ax.com... > On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 15:32:59 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> > wrote in alt.atheism: >>Why would I invent a religion? > > Because the ones that demand you be honest all reject you. Kindly cite a religion that expects its adherents to be honest.
From: Alex W. on 29 Jun 2008 21:59 "rbwinn" <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote in message news:0757195d-ffee-49da-97e8-39de11b42bb4(a)d19g2000prm.googlegroups.com... On Jun 29, 10:55?am, "Alex W." <ing...(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message > > news:6ba076e7-8a36-4286-be86-11052530ded2(a)k13g2000hse.googlegroups.com... > > Well, you have to understand that no man knoweth the day and the > hour. ?Anyone who claims they do will be proven wrong. > > =============== > > Wrong. > > http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/article.php?scid=8&did=190 Well, the subject we were discussing was the Second Coming of Christ. Are you saying that this information about executions is somehow relevant? -========== Only insofar as it disproves your claim that no man knoweth the hour.
From: Pmb on 29 Jun 2008 22:29 "Alex W." <ingilt(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:6cqt1uF3hri1vU1(a)mid.individual.net... > > "Free Lunch" <lunch(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote in message > news:ej5g64psvc40o3fq3lpi12h4id0b8dskga(a)4ax.com... >> On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 15:32:59 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> >> wrote in alt.atheism: > > >>>Why would I invent a religion? >> >> Because the ones that demand you be honest all reject you. > > Kindly cite a religion that expects its adherents to be honest. Christianity, Catholicism, Judaism, Islam, etc,. Pete
From: Pmb on 29 Jun 2008 22:31 "Alex W." <ingilt(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:6cqt1uF3hri1vU1(a)mid.individual.net... > > "Free Lunch" <lunch(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote in message > news:ej5g64psvc40o3fq3lpi12h4id0b8dskga(a)4ax.com... >> On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 15:32:59 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> >> wrote in alt.atheism: > > >>>Why would I invent a religion? >> >> Because the ones that demand you be honest all reject you. > > Kindly cite a religion that expects its adherents to be honest. Note: When I wrote "Christianity, Catholicism" in my previous post I was referring to Christianity as a whole but more so with Catholicism since that they have more rules to follow and seem to have to be more rigid than the Bible explicitly states. I could be wrong though. Pete
From: Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al) on 29 Jun 2008 22:42
On Jun 27, 10:36 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: > On Jun 22, 1:04 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: > > > > > rbwinn wrote: > > > On Jun 21, 4:09 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: > > >> rbwinn wrote: > > >>> On Jun 21, 8:16�am, "Alex W." <ing...(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > >>>> "Steve O" <nospamh...(a)thanks.com> wrote in message > > >>>>news:6c4ja8F3erpl2U1(a)mid.individual.net... > > >>>>> If you think that Harry Potter is fiction then you must also think that > > >>>>> London doesn't exist right? > > >>>>> You'd better tell that to all of the people who live there, it may come as > > >>>>> a surprise to them. > > >>>> Like the esteemed Mr Winn Esq, London councils have no doubt whatsoever > > >>>> about the existence of London. �At least, that is what they profess when > > >>>> they send out council tax demands. > > >>> Taxes. Well, that is something that should convince some atheists. > > >>> Taxes are something they will never deny. > > >> Are taxes evidence that any gods exist?- Hide quoted text - > > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > > Taxes are evidence that atheists exist. > > > I'm sure that you believe that. Why should we? > > > Who needs more evidence that atheists exist? Some supporting evidence > > for gods would be of more intersest.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Well, we offered the Bible as evidence, and you said that it was all > mythology. No, I think you'll find "we" said it was a book, and not what anyone would call evidence. >Then we said, what about the parts that tell of Hezekiah's > tunnel and the earthen ramp the Assyrian army built over the city wall > when they took Lachish? Those can still be seen today. And we said so what? What does that have to do with the other bits you're claiming are true. > No, Harry > Potter left from the train station in London to go to wizard's school, > so the city of London does not exist. > But I know a man from London. He says that Harry Potter does not > exist. Atheists do not believe that I know a man from London. > Tell me how a supporting evidence means anything to an atheist. > Robert B. Winn And then you exhibited willful misinterpretation of everything anyone said and proceeded to mumble on about fictional characters. Al |