Does God need to prove He exists?
in [Physics]
|
From: rbwinn on 30 Jun 2008 20:31 On Jun 30, 2:57�pm, "Steve O" <nospamh...(a)thanks.com> wrote: > "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message news:deedcfe4-50c8-4aba-9a1f- > > I am still in the religion I was born in. �I picked the religion I am in > > before I > > was born. > > Robert B. Winn > > Probably the most idiotic thing you have ever said. > Go on, I dare you try and explain this statement without looking like the > fool you are. > > -- > Steve O Jeremiah chapter 1. Robert B. Winn
From: rbwinn on 30 Jun 2008 20:34 On Jun 30, 2:59�pm, "Steve O" <nospamh...(a)thanks.com> wrote: > "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message > > news:1ce59514-cea6-4e3f-b227-f2e92dd39117(a)l28g2000prd.googlegroups.com... > > > > > Why would I invent a religion? > > Robert b. Winn > > Your prophet, Joe Smith managed to do that and did quite well out of it. > (at least until the mob caught up with him, that is) > So why shouldn't you? > > -- > Steve O Joseph Smith had a very difficult life. Then he was shot by a mob. If he did quite well out of it, then it was in the hereafter. So are you saying that you believe Joseph Smith obtained some kind of reward after his death? Robert B. Winn
From: rbwinn on 30 Jun 2008 20:38 On Jun 30, 3:05 pm, "Steve O" <nospamh...(a)thanks.com> wrote: > "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message > > news:5421b8a8-3b91-4b3b-b6a6-d6db5f4ce845(a)s33g2000pri.googlegroups.com... > > > On Jun 29, 9:46�am, raven1 <quoththera...(a)nevermore.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 07:23:07 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> > >> wrote: > > >> >No, I do not have difficulty following conversations. �Atheists said > >> >that there was nothing in the Bible that could be proven. > > >> No atheist claims such a ridiculous thing. Obviously there are things > >> in the Bible that can be proven. It is trivial, for example to > >> demonstrate the existence of the city of Jerusalem, so I don't know > >> why you're so insistent on the existence of a particular tunnel being > >> significant. > > Because he has nothing else? > Sad, really, isn't it? > > snip > > > Well, you claim to believe in Jerusalem even though it is mentioned in > > the Bible.  So why is it so impossible for an atheist to admit the > > existence of Hezekiah's tunnel? > > Robert B. Winn > > I have already agreed that the tunnel, together with others not mentioned in > the bible, does exist. > Your move. > > -- > Steve O > a.a. #2240 (Apatheist Chapter) > B.A.A.W.A. > Convicted by Earthquack, > Exempt from purgatory by papal indulgence > "I have a miraculous picture of Jesus - if you look really closely at the > face, you can see a burnt tortilla" I don't think you are really being sincere about this, Steve. You seem to be more of a tunnel believer impersonator than a true believer. However, believing in the tunnel will not save you. Disbelieving in the tunnel will not condemn you. Well, now we have reached this point in our conversation. By the way, this has probably been the longest conversation between atheists and a Christian that ever took place. Robert B. Winn
From: hhyapster on 30 Jun 2008 20:42 On Jun 30, 6:48 am, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: > On Jun 29, 10:55�am, "Alex W." <ing...(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > > "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message > > >news:6ba076e7-8a36-4286-be86-11052530ded2(a)k13g2000hse.googlegroups.com... > > > Well, you have to understand that no man knoweth the day and the > > hour. �Anyone who claims they do will be proven wrong. > > > =============== > > > Wrong. > > >http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/article.php?scid=8&did=190 > > Well, the subject we were discussing was the Second Coming of Christ. > Are you saying that this information about executions is somehow > relevant? > Robert b. Winn You are such an idiot that claiming all the coming of Jesus all the time. What coming are we talking about? Human died and never get to come back, much like your ancestors.... and Jesus was an ancient human, he will never come back. If he can come back, he will never be dead in the first place. Please deal with this as true logical fact or go and get some tranquilizer.
From: Steve O on 30 Jun 2008 21:28
"rbwinn" <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote in message news:c4e4d588-3124-45b3-a064-d5a153da4758(a)z32g2000prh.googlegroups.com... > On Jun 30, 2:59�pm, "Steve O" <nospamh...(a)thanks.com> wrote: >> "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message >> >> news:1ce59514-cea6-4e3f-b227-f2e92dd39117(a)l28g2000prd.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> >> > Why would I invent a religion? >> > Robert b. Winn >> >> Your prophet, Joe Smith managed to do that and did quite well out of it. >> (at least until the mob caught up with him, that is) >> So why shouldn't you? >> >> -- >> Steve O > > Joseph Smith had a very difficult life. Then he was shot by a mob. > If he did quite well out of it, then it was in the hereafter. So are > you saying that you believe Joseph Smith obtained some kind of reward > after his death? > Robert B. Winn Of course I'm not, and I have absolutely no idea why you would suggest that I am saying anything like that. How is it even remotely possible for some one to receive a reward AFTER death? -- Steve O a.a. #2240 (Apatheist Chapter) B.A.A.W.A. Convicted by Earthquack, Exempt from purgatory by papal indulgence "I have a miraculous picture of Jesus - if you look really closely at the face, you can see a burnt tortilla" |