From: Smiler on

"rbwinn" <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote in message
news:c609a75d-0179-4af5-b167-1914a95eef10(a)x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 3, 6:02 pm, hhyaps...(a)gmail.com wrote:
> On Jul 3, 7:54 am, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 2, 1:15?pm, "Steve O" <nospamh...(a)thanks.com> wrote:
>
> > > "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message
> > > news:8477a37f-f1a9-4725-a891-
>
> > > > Well, if I am not mistaken, you did say that you were going to die
> > > > and
> > > > decompose. ?That was as far as we got with your future plans.
> > > > Robert B. Winn
>
> > > It's not a future plan
> > > It is a future inevitability.
> > > You need to distinguish between the two.
>
> > > --
> > > Steve O
> > > a.a. #2240 (Apatheist Chapter)
> > > B.A.A.W.A.
> > > Convicted by Earthquack,
> > > Exempt from purgatory by papal indulgence
> > > "I have a miraculous picture of Jesus - if you look really closely at
> > > the
> > > face, you can see a burnt tortilla"
>
> > Well, I think that you will discover that your spirit does not stay in
> > your body after you die. As I understand it, you want yours to
> > decompose with your physical body.
> > Rober B. Winn
>
> The spirit you are talking about is the consciousness of human when
> his biological body is functioning, helped by his live brain wave and
> aided by various body sensors.
> When a person dies, his body cells die too and the consciousness (no
> spirit) stop to be generated.
> That is how biological living cells worked, in human at least.
> You loons and bigots take consciousness as souls and spirit which can
> exist after death.
> There is no such thing as soul or spirit.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Well
---------------------------
Ho! <whack>

Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279


From: Smiler on

"rbwinn" <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote in message
news:0a0fbe52-4a69-483c-b3c1-f0a31454e09b(a)k13g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 4, 5:34?am, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 21:58:13 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote
> in alt.atheism:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Jul 3, 6:02?pm, hhyaps...(a)gmail.com wrote:
> >> On Jul 3, 7:54 am, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote:
>
> >> > On Jul 2, 1:15?pm, "Steve O" <nospamh...(a)thanks.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message
> >> > > news:8477a37f-f1a9-4725-a891-
>
> >> > > > Well, if I am not mistaken, you did say that you were going to
> >> > > > die and
> >> > > > decompose. ?That was as far as we got with your future plans.
> >> > > > Robert B. Winn
>
> >> > > It's not a future plan
> >> > > It is a future inevitability.
> >> > > You need to distinguish between the two.
>
> >> > > --
> >> > > Steve O
> >> > > a.a. #2240 (Apatheist Chapter)
> >> > > B.A.A.W.A.
> >> > > Convicted by Earthquack,
> >> > > Exempt from purgatory by papal indulgence
> >> > > "I have a miraculous picture of Jesus - if you look really closely
> >> > > at the
> >> > > face, you can see a burnt tortilla"
>
> >> > Well, I think that you will discover that your spirit does not stay
> >> > in
> >> > your body after you die. ?As I understand it, you want yours to
> >> > decompose with your physical body.
> >> > Rober B. Winn
>
> >> The spirit you are talking about is the consciousness of human when
> >> his biological body is functioning, helped by his live brain wave and
> >> aided by various body sensors.
> >> When a person dies, his body cells die too and the consciousness (no
> >> spirit) stop to be generated.
> >> That is how biological living cells worked, in human at least.
> >> You loons and bigots take consciousness as souls and spirit which can
> >> exist after death.
> >> There is no such thing as soul or spirit.- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> >Well, so you think it is a mistake to believe in a soul. ?Why would it
> >be a mistake?
>
> No evidence supports the concept.
>
> >Even if it were as you say, the person is motivated to
> >live a better life than by just believing in the management of the
> >creature. ?The worst a person could do by believing in a soul would be
> >to live a better life.
>
> So, you are just cynical and manipulative and think that people will
> only behave well if they are made fake promises that the person making
> the promise cannot deliver.
>
> Wow.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Well
--------------------------
Ho! <whack>

Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279


From: Smiler on

"rbwinn" <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote in message
news:2f0f28b7-2caa-487f-b1a1-1e85f761ed79(a)m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 3, 11:28 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote:
> rbwinn wrote:
> > On Jul 3, 1:55 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote:
> >> rbwinn wrote:
> >>> On Jul 2, 8:35 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote:
> >>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>> On Jul 2, 2:03 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote:
> >>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Jul 1, 11:59 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Jul 1, 1:04 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 1, 12:20 am, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 30, 1:19?pm, Enkidu <fox_rgf...(a)trashmail.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:22183802-cf28-4305-af11-
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7d254b106...(a)d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are the one being deliberately obtuse. ? The existence
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tunnel validates many other things said in the Bible about
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assyrian invasion of Judea.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "The Hobbit" talks of ale, axes, and forests which we know
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> exist. Does that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> validate Orcs, Elves, Dwarves, trolls, magic rings, walking
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> trees and Tom
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bombadil?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Enkidu AA#2165 ?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> EAC Chaplain and ordained minister,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ULC, Modesto, CA
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Doesn't anything socialistic make you want to throw up?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Like great public
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> schools, or health insurance for all?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ? ? ?-Kurt Vonnegut
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Why don't you decide for yourself? You were the one who
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> thought of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Why don't you try to defend your assertions? How can we know
> >>>>>>>>>>>> we can
> >>>>>>>>>>>> trust what you say?- Hide quoted text -
> >>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
> >>>>>>>>>>> It does not matter to me what you trust. You decide what you
> >>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>> going to trust.
> >>>>>>>>>> If you can't provide any sensible reason to believe your
> >>>>>>>>>> fanciful
> >>>>>>>>>> claims, then I guess we're done.- Hide quoted text -
> >>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
> >>>>>>>>> Fanciful claims? I said that the Jews dug a tunnel as a conduit
> >>>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>> water between Gihon spring and the pool of Siloam. Why do you
> >>>>>>>>> think
> >>>>>>>>> that is a fanciful claim?
> >>>>>>>> That is not a fanciful claim. You and I both know that I'm
> >>>>>>>> referring to
> >>>>>>>> your supernatural claims. Those would be the ones you're
> >>>>>>>> completely
> >>>>>>>> unable to support with any evidence.- Hide quoted text -
> >>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
> >>>>>>> I have not made any claims to atheists except that the Jews dug a
> >>>>>>> tunnel to be used as a conduit for water, and the Assyrians built
> >>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>> ramp out of dirt to get over the city wall at Lachish. To an
> >>>>>>> atheist
> >>>>>>> these might seem like supernatural claims because there were
> >>>>>>> actually
> >>>>>>> people working to accomplish both of these tasks instead of just
> >>>>>>> giving orders, criticism, etc., the way atheists do. Since
> >>>>>>> atheists
> >>>>>>> have been unable to visualize these two events, there is no reason
> >>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>> proceed on to anything more complex.
> >>>>>> Then we're in total agreement. A tunnel was dug a long time ago and
> >>>>>> it
> >>>>>> got mentioned in some ancient writings, providing absolutlely no
> >>>>>> support
> >>>>>> for any supernatural claims.
> >>>>>> So why all the posts?- Hide quoted text -
> >>>>>> - Show quoted text -
> >>>>> You do not seem to be visualizing it very well. The Assyrians came
> >>>>> into Judea with an army of hundreds of thousands on their way home
> >>>>> after taking a big chunk of Egypt. Judea was a little dot in the
> >>>>> middle of the Assyrian kingdom, which extended from the Caspian Sea
> >>>>> to
> >>>>> Egypt. So why was there still a Kingdom of Judea when King
> >>>>> Sennacherib got back to his capitol city of Ninevah? Sennacherib
> >>>>> himself says there was on the column he had erected in Ninevah.
> >>>> Or so the story goes.- Hide quoted text -
> >>>> - Show quoted text -
> >>> What do you mean so the story goes? The column erected by Sennacherib
> >>> in Ninevah is still there today. He plainly says on it that Hezekiah
> >>> paid tribute to him, and he was such a nice guy that he just went home
> >>> after he got the money.
> >> Great. Sennacherib went home and left Jerusalem unsacked. That doesn't
> >> mean that it was due to the angel of the lord slaughtering 185,000
> >> troops in a night.
>
> >> Why do you favour the oddly magical Biblical account over
> >> Sennacherib's?- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > 186,000 troops. Chaldean historians of the same time said that the
> > Assyrian army died of plague while besieging Jerusalem, and
> > Sennacherib fled in great fear back to his own city of Ninevah.
> > Sennacherib made no mention of losing his army on the column he
> > erected. He seems to have pretended to his fellow Assyrians that the
> > army was still somewhere doing something, but his own two sons
> > murdered him, probably because they were upset about him losing the
> > army.
>
> So where are God's footprints in all of this? Arguments for both sides
> can be made without invoking magic.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Well
-------------------------------
Ho! <whack>

Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279


From: Smiler on

"rbwinn" <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote in message
news:54f871e3-009e-4f18-97af-395a6ed25b86(a)l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 3, 3:54?pm, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 15:15:28 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote
> in alt.atheism:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Jul 3, 1:21?pm, raven1 <quoththera...(a)nevermore.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 21:57:37 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >On Jul 2, 5:50?pm, raven1 <quoththera...(a)nevermore.com> wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 17:01:29 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com>
> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >On Jul 2, 1:32?pm, raven1 <quoththera...(a)nevermore.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 05:35:47 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn
> >> >> >> <rbwi...(a)juno.com>
> >> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >On Jul 1, 8:49?pm, raven1 <quoththera...(a)nevermore.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 18:14:36 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn
> >> >> >> >> <rbwi...(a)juno.com>
> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> >On Jul 1, 1:07?pm, raven1 <quoththera...(a)nevermore.com>
> >> >> >> >> >wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 00:17:22 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn
> >> >> >> >> >> <rbwi...(a)juno.com>
> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >On Jun 30, 3:58?pm, raven1 <quoththera...(a)nevermore.com>
> >> >> >> >> >> >wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 00:06:02 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn
> >> >> >> >> >> >> <rbwi...(a)juno.com>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >On Jun 29, 4:12?pm, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 15:23:58 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <rbwi...(a)juno.com>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote in alt.atheism:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >On Jun 29, 7:07?am, Free Lunch
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ><lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 07:06:07 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <rbwi...(a)juno.com>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote in alt.atheism:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ...
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >I did not lie. ?There actually is a conduit for
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >water between Gihon
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >spring and the pool of Siloam.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> And, as you know, that is not the lie I have
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> pointed out to you. You lie
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> here by falsely and intentionally trying to
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> distract us from the lie
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> under discussion. You know that no one imposes
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> abortion in the United
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> States. That is another in a long line of lies
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> that you refuse to repent
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> of.- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >The Supreme Court and other atheists imposed
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >abortion on the United
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >States.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Abortion is not imposed. You know that. No one is
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ever forced to have an
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> abortion by our government. Stop lying to us.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >Women have been forced to have abortions in order to
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >get welfare
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >assistance.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> Bullshit. Citation, please.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >And our government still recognizes our right to trial by
> >> >> >> >> >> >jury,
> >> >> >> >> >> >right?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> Nice attempt at distraction, but completely irrelevant.
> >> >> >> >> >> This has
> >> >> >> >> >> absolutely nothing to do with women being forced to have
> >> >> >> >> >> abortions in
> >> >> >> >> >> order to get welfare assistance. Which is still a
> >> >> >> >> >> completely bogus
> >> >> >> >> >> claim on your part.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > How gullible do you think I am about "our government"?
> >> >> >> >> >> > ?Or
> >> >> >> >> >> >maybe you are just including atheists when you say "our
> >> >> >> >> >> >government".
>
> >> >> >> >> >> I didn't say you were gullible, I said you were lying. Your
> >> >> >> >> >> pathetic
> >> >> >> >> >> attempt to change the subject, rather than support your
> >> >> >> >> >> claim, just
> >> >> >> >> >> confirms my assessment.
> >> >> >> >> >I personally know one woman who was subjected to governmental
> >> >> >> >> >reproduction control.
>
> >> >> >> >> Was she Chinese? Seriously, put up, or shut up. You made a
> >> >> >> >> claim; now
> >> >> >> >> either back it up or retract it.- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> >> >> >Do atheists have some special program for Chinese women in the
> >> >> >> >United
> >> >> >> >States? ?We know they do in China. ?However, there are a lot of
> >> >> >> >women
> >> >> >> >in the United States you do not even seem to consider, women in
> >> >> >> >mental
> >> >> >> >institutions, women in prisons, etc., but the one I know
> >> >> >> >personally
> >> >> >> >was just a woman who applied for welfare assistance.
>
> >> >> >> IOW, you have nothing to support your claim. Thanks for clearing
> >> >> >> that
> >> >> >> up.
>
> >> >> >You are free to believe or disbelieve what I said about this woman,
> >> >> >just as you are free to believe or disbelieve anything else I say.
> >> >> >Does this seem unfair to you?
>
> >> >> What seems unclear to me is why you insist on violating your
> >> >> religion's commandment against bearing false witness. Quite frankly,
> >> >> you're insulting everyone's intelligence by telling such a
> >> >> transparent
> >> >> lie, although when combined with the fact that you seem to doubt
> >> >> everything anyone else tells you, however innocuous, it suggests
> >> >> that
> >> >> the reason might be that you're a pathological liar, projecting your
> >> >> problem onto everyone else.- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> >> >Sorry, but I do personally know a woman who was given that choice.
>
> >> Repeating your claim does not make it any more believable. Perhaps if
> >> you were to provide a detailed account of
>
> >> -what State and city this occurred in
> >> -what agency made such a demand, and
> >> -in what context, and on what legal or procedural basis
>
> >> it might be slightly more believable. Until then, it's not the
> >> slightest bit credible.- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> >Uh huh, and you do not believe that it happens in China because the
> >atheists who run China are nice people.
>
> But you, you lying pile of feces, claimed that this happened in the
> United States. Of course you are also quite hateful in your implication
> that atheists in the United States defend the evil done in China.- Hide
> quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Well
--------------------------------
Ho! <whack>

Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279


From: Smiler on

"rbwinn" <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote in message
news:af5231aa-0775-47c0-8e39-fd03d7156818(a)e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 3, 4:50?pm, raven1 <quoththera...(a)nevermore.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 15:15:28 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Jul 3, 1:21?pm, raven1 <quoththera...(a)nevermore.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 21:57:37 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >On Jul 2, 5:50?pm, raven1 <quoththera...(a)nevermore.com> wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 17:01:29 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com>
> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >On Jul 2, 1:32?pm, raven1 <quoththera...(a)nevermore.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 05:35:47 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn
> >> >> >> <rbwi...(a)juno.com>
> >> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >On Jul 1, 8:49?pm, raven1 <quoththera...(a)nevermore.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 18:14:36 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn
> >> >> >> >> <rbwi...(a)juno.com>
> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> >On Jul 1, 1:07?pm, raven1 <quoththera...(a)nevermore.com>
> >> >> >> >> >wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 00:17:22 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn
> >> >> >> >> >> <rbwi...(a)juno.com>
> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >On Jun 30, 3:58?pm, raven1 <quoththera...(a)nevermore.com>
> >> >> >> >> >> >wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 00:06:02 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn
> >> >> >> >> >> >> <rbwi...(a)juno.com>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >On Jun 29, 4:12?pm, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 15:23:58 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <rbwi...(a)juno.com>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote in alt.atheism:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >On Jun 29, 7:07?am, Free Lunch
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ><lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 07:06:07 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <rbwi...(a)juno.com>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote in alt.atheism:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ...
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >I did not lie. ?There actually is a conduit for
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >water between Gihon
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >spring and the pool of Siloam.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> And, as you know, that is not the lie I have
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> pointed out to you. You lie
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> here by falsely and intentionally trying to
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> distract us from the lie
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> under discussion. You know that no one imposes
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> abortion in the United
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> States. That is another in a long line of lies
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> that you refuse to repent
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> of.- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >The Supreme Court and other atheists imposed
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >abortion on the United
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >States.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Abortion is not imposed. You know that. No one is
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ever forced to have an
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> abortion by our government. Stop lying to us.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >Women have been forced to have abortions in order to
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >get welfare
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >assistance.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> Bullshit. Citation, please.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >And our government still recognizes our right to trial by
> >> >> >> >> >> >jury,
> >> >> >> >> >> >right?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> Nice attempt at distraction, but completely irrelevant.
> >> >> >> >> >> This has
> >> >> >> >> >> absolutely nothing to do with women being forced to have
> >> >> >> >> >> abortions in
> >> >> >> >> >> order to get welfare assistance. Which is still a
> >> >> >> >> >> completely bogus
> >> >> >> >> >> claim on your part.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > How gullible do you think I am about "our government"?
> >> >> >> >> >> > ?Or
> >> >> >> >> >> >maybe you are just including atheists when you say "our
> >> >> >> >> >> >government".
>
> >> >> >> >> >> I didn't say you were gullible, I said you were lying. Your
> >> >> >> >> >> pathetic
> >> >> >> >> >> attempt to change the subject, rather than support your
> >> >> >> >> >> claim, just
> >> >> >> >> >> confirms my assessment.
> >> >> >> >> >I personally know one woman who was subjected to governmental
> >> >> >> >> >reproduction control.
>
> >> >> >> >> Was she Chinese? Seriously, put up, or shut up. You made a
> >> >> >> >> claim; now
> >> >> >> >> either back it up or retract it.- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> >> >> >Do atheists have some special program for Chinese women in the
> >> >> >> >United
> >> >> >> >States? ?We know they do in China. ?However, there are a lot of
> >> >> >> >women
> >> >> >> >in the United States you do not even seem to consider, women in
> >> >> >> >mental
> >> >> >> >institutions, women in prisons, etc., but the one I know
> >> >> >> >personally
> >> >> >> >was just a woman who applied for welfare assistance.
>
> >> >> >> IOW, you have nothing to support your claim. Thanks for clearing
> >> >> >> that
> >> >> >> up.
>
> >> >> >You are free to believe or disbelieve what I said about this woman,
> >> >> >just as you are free to believe or disbelieve anything else I say.
> >> >> >Does this seem unfair to you?
>
> >> >> What seems unclear to me is why you insist on violating your
> >> >> religion's commandment against bearing false witness. Quite frankly,
> >> >> you're insulting everyone's intelligence by telling such a
> >> >> transparent
> >> >> lie, although when combined with the fact that you seem to doubt
> >> >> everything anyone else tells you, however innocuous, it suggests
> >> >> that
> >> >> the reason might be that you're a pathological liar, projecting your
> >> >> problem onto everyone else.- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> >> >Sorry, but I do personally know a woman who was given that choice.
>
> >> Repeating your claim does not make it any more believable. Perhaps if
> >> you were to provide a detailed account of
>
> >> -what State and city this occurred in
> >> -what agency made such a demand, and
> >> -in what context, and on what legal or procedural basis
>
> >> it might be slightly more believable. Until then, it's not the
> >> slightest bit credible.
>
> >Uh huh, and you do not believe that it happens in China
>
> Nice try, but you're not weaseling out of this. The question is not
> what happens in China, but what happens in the US, specifically to the
> woman you claim to know. Put up or shut up.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Well
--------------------------
Ho! <whack>

Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279