Does God need to prove He exists?
in [Physics]
|
From: Alex W. on 1 Jul 2008 17:48 "Steve O" <nospamhere(a)thanks.com> wrote in message news:6cvf3uF2ot9U1(a)mid.individual.net... > > > "Alex W." <ingilt(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message > news:6cv8v5F1j0hU1(a)mid.individual.net... >> >> >> It is possible that this is some sort of weird Turing Test .... > > I had considered that, but I would expect a bot to talk more sense Might be running on Windows ... :-)
From: Alex W. on 1 Jul 2008 17:50 "Steve O" <nospamhere(a)thanks.com> wrote in message news:6cvgs3F303pU1(a)mid.individual.net... > > > "rbwinn" <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote in message > news:3770038e-e7b0-4e64-9dd5-d442a816638a(a)m45g2000hsb.googlegroups.com... >>> >>> > Well, there is your mistake, Steve. I am not arguing with anyone. >>> > You atheists are free to believe whatever you want to believe. >>> > Robert B. Winn >>> >>> Don't be so dumb. >>> Your argument is that there is a God. >>> > >> I never argue, Steve. If you want to be an atheist, that is your >> privilege. I was just curious about what you were going to do after >> you die. >> Robert B. Winn >> > Well, I was planning on decomposing, just like everyone else. Cremation is cheaper. Unfortunately, taxidermy is illegal, otherwise I'd seriously consider it.
From: Alex W. on 1 Jul 2008 17:51 "rbwinn" <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote in message news:13339a2a-8599-41b2-ac22-cb13fde245ce(a)l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com... The cytoblast is doing exactly what it is supposed to do. That means it is not a parasite. So does a tapeworm, but it's still a parasite.
From: Alex W. on 1 Jul 2008 17:52 "Steve O" <nospamhere(a)thanks.com> wrote in message news:6cvfr0F2tkcU2(a)mid.individual.net... > > > "rbwinn" <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote in message > news:ef48d0b6-169e-48e8-899b-1b4eef574eb2(a)p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... >> No, Paul was talking about evolution. That is where animals turn into >> humans. See a fable is a story about an animal with human >> characteristics. >> Robert B. Winn > > Humans ARE a type of animal, classified as mammal, the last time I > checked. > Yet another subject you are completely ignorant about. And a primate to boot! Oook!
From: Daniel Mandic on 1 Jul 2008 17:54
Alex W. wrote: > :-) :-) -- |