Does God need to prove He exists?
in [Physics]
|
From: BuddyThunder on 4 Jul 2008 02:46 rbwinn wrote: > On Jul 3, 2:12 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: >> rbwinn wrote: >>> On Jul 2, 4:03�pm, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: >>>> On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 22:13:21 -0700 (PDT), in alt.atheism >>>> rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in >>>> <f028bc18-d1bb-4772-a436-fb649e3ff...(a)59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>: >>>>> On Jul 1, 5:05?pm, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 07:31:29 -0700 (PDT), in alt.atheism >>>>>> rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in >>>>>> <ccc732d9-4c47-442b-ad22-fc806fe8b...(a)z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>: >>>>>>> On Jul 1, 12:32?am, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: >>>>>>>> Free Lunch wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:26:07 -0700 (PDT), in alt.atheism >>>>>>>>> rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>> <b804ab27-a92f-4ef2-a69c-54dd80028...(a)j33g2000pri.googlegroups.com>: >>>>>>>>>> On Jun 30, 12:25?am, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Free Lunch wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 15:15:20 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in alt.atheism: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 28, 6:06?pm, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:26:59 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in alt.atheism: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 28, 12:50?pm, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:11:54 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in alt.atheism: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 28, 7:17?am, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 07:05:42 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in alt.atheism: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 28, 12:26?am, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 27, 6:42?pm, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jack wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am upset by *people* who >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe that the Bible is anything more than mythology and try ?to impose >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beliefs on me ?using the Bible as evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How can someone impose a belief on you? ?Just believe whatever you want to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The wrong part is when people attempt to use the myth to formulate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> public policy or indoctrinate children or inform foreign policy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, actually they use fables. ?The apostles Paul said they would be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> turned to fables in the last days. ?A fable is a story about animals >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like the story about monkeys turning into humans. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wow, you're ignorant about evolution. Colour me surprised. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In what way am I ignorant about evolution? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Monkeys and humans do share a common ancestor. Your denial of the fact >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does not change that fact.- Hide quoted text - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Charles Darwin was not my ancestor. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Evolution happens. Learn to deal with reality.- Hide quoted text - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I never have believed in evolution. ?I think it is a fable, just as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Paul said it was. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Paul knew nothing about it. You mock the Bible with such silly >>>>>>>>>>>>>> interpretations of it.- Hide quoted text - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text - >>>>>>>>>>>>> I just believe what Paul said. ?You seem a little upset that I do not >>>>>>>>>>>>> believe your fable. >>>>>>>>>>>> Your problem is that you _lied_ about what Paul said. He _never_ said >>>>>>>>>>>> that evolution was a fable. That was the lie you told, one you cannot >>>>>>>>>>>> back up with _anything_ in the Bible, not from Paul, not from anywhere. >>>>>>>>>>> It's gotta be tough to keep 'em all in a row this far down the road!- Hide quoted text - >>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text - >>>>>>>>>> Well, if Paul had named Charles Darwin by name, atheists would claim >>>>>>>>>> he was not talking about evolution. >>>>>>>>> You know you lied to us, but you are trying to run away from your >>>>>>>>> behavior when you were caught. >>>>>>>> It is not weakness to admit a mistake, Robert. We won't tell the other >>>>>>>> atheists.- Hide quoted text - >>>>>>>> - Show quoted text - >>>>>>> Well, I am sure you will not. ?What would their reaction be to >>>>>>> discover that the apostle Paul had identified the theory of evolution >>>>>>> as a fable? >>>>>> He did not. You lied to us about that. Remember?- Hide quoted text - >>>>>> - Show quoted text - >>>>> Well, the best one to ask about that would be Paul. >>>> Paul is dead.- Hide quoted text - >>> Well, that is why you will have to wait until both of you have been >>> resurrected. I think Paul would be able to convince you. >> Got nuthin'?- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > So are you saying that you want me to send you a copy of the Bible? No thanks, I found it to be of little use.
From: BuddyThunder on 4 Jul 2008 02:47 rbwinn wrote: > On Jul 3, 2:23 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: >> rbwinn wrote: >>> On Jul 2, 4:03�pm, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: >>>> On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 22:13:21 -0700 (PDT), in alt.atheism >>>> rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in >>>> <f028bc18-d1bb-4772-a436-fb649e3ff...(a)59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>: >>>>> On Jul 1, 5:05?pm, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 07:31:29 -0700 (PDT), in alt.atheism >>>>>> rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in >>>>>> <ccc732d9-4c47-442b-ad22-fc806fe8b...(a)z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>: >>>>>>> On Jul 1, 12:32?am, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: >>>>>>>> Free Lunch wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:26:07 -0700 (PDT), in alt.atheism >>>>>>>>> rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>> <b804ab27-a92f-4ef2-a69c-54dd80028...(a)j33g2000pri.googlegroups.com>: >>>>>>>>>> On Jun 30, 12:25?am, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Free Lunch wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 15:15:20 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in alt.atheism: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 28, 6:06?pm, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:26:59 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in alt.atheism: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 28, 12:50?pm, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:11:54 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in alt.atheism: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 28, 7:17?am, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 07:05:42 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in alt.atheism: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 28, 12:26?am, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 27, 6:42?pm, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jack wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am upset by *people* who >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe that the Bible is anything more than mythology and try ?to impose >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beliefs on me ?using the Bible as evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How can someone impose a belief on you? ?Just believe whatever you want to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The wrong part is when people attempt to use the myth to formulate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> public policy or indoctrinate children or inform foreign policy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, actually they use fables. ?The apostles Paul said they would be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> turned to fables in the last days. ?A fable is a story about animals >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like the story about monkeys turning into humans. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wow, you're ignorant about evolution. Colour me surprised. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In what way am I ignorant about evolution? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Monkeys and humans do share a common ancestor. Your denial of the fact >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does not change that fact.- Hide quoted text - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Charles Darwin was not my ancestor. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Evolution happens. Learn to deal with reality.- Hide quoted text - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I never have believed in evolution. ?I think it is a fable, just as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Paul said it was. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Paul knew nothing about it. You mock the Bible with such silly >>>>>>>>>>>>>> interpretations of it.- Hide quoted text - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text - >>>>>>>>>>>>> I just believe what Paul said. ?You seem a little upset that I do not >>>>>>>>>>>>> believe your fable. >>>>>>>>>>>> Your problem is that you _lied_ about what Paul said. He _never_ said >>>>>>>>>>>> that evolution was a fable. That was the lie you told, one you cannot >>>>>>>>>>>> back up with _anything_ in the Bible, not from Paul, not from anywhere. >>>>>>>>>>> It's gotta be tough to keep 'em all in a row this far down the road!- Hide quoted text - >>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text - >>>>>>>>>> Well, if Paul had named Charles Darwin by name, atheists would claim >>>>>>>>>> he was not talking about evolution. >>>>>>>>> You know you lied to us, but you are trying to run away from your >>>>>>>>> behavior when you were caught. >>>>>>>> It is not weakness to admit a mistake, Robert. We won't tell the other >>>>>>>> atheists.- Hide quoted text - >>>>>>>> - Show quoted text - >>>>>>> Well, I am sure you will not. ?What would their reaction be to >>>>>>> discover that the apostle Paul had identified the theory of evolution >>>>>>> as a fable? >>>>>> He did not. You lied to us about that. Remember?- Hide quoted text - >>>>>> - Show quoted text - >>>>> Well, the best one to ask about that would be Paul. >>>> Paul is dead.- Hide quoted text - >>>> - Show quoted text - >>> How did Paul end up dead if he never existed? Harry Potter is not >>> dead. He is not alive. He is just a fictional character in a book. >>> So explain how Paul never existed, but now he is dead. >> Well, someone wrote those letters. At least one person, much more likely >> more. We can collectively call them "Paul" if it makes you comfortable. :-)- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > You are free to do whatever you decide to do. I do not personally pay > much attention to what you do. Aw, and we were getting along so well!
From: Steve O on 4 Jul 2008 02:52 <hhyapster(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:14203dca-5554-4b53-a802-d10de1074c27(a)q27g2000prf.googlegroups.com... > On Jul 4, 12:44 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: >> On Jul 3, 5:32�pm, "Alex W." <ing...(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> >> >> >> > "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message >> >> >news:9fadb87c-6364-49eb-9ca6-c8fd555f6cd3(a)a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com... >> > On Jul 3, 6:05?am, "Alex W." <ing...(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> >> > > "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message >> >> > >news:f807e4d0-b40f-4cb8-bb4c-12f00021898d(a)34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com... >> >> > > Well, the scriptures say that the wicked would be more miserable in >> > > the presence of God than with the devils in hell. >> >> > > =========== >> >> > > In other words, since we are all sinful by definition, the smart >> > > choice is >> > > to aim for hell in the first place. ?Nice morality .... >> >> > No, the smart choice is to repent of sins. �However, atheists claim >> > that nothing they do is sin, so they are not going to repent. >> >> > ========== >> >> > Sin is a social construct. �It exists irrespective of the god(s) >> > worshipped >> > ... or not, as the case may be. >> >> Well, there is no sin in heaven. Maybe that is why atheists do not >> want to go there. >> Robert B. Winn > > This is a big lie invented by you, two in fact, please acknowledge ! > 1). You are here on earth and not in the heaven, how do you know there > is no sin there? > 2). No atheist has indicated to you that he does not want to go to > heaven, and you put word into his mouth. Ahem, my apologies, that was me. ;-) I couldn't think of a worse possible punishment than having to exist for all of eternity - it would be mind destroying. If there was a God, he'd be as crazy as a loon by now, methinks. -- Steve O a.a. #2240 (Apatheist Chapter) B.A.A.W.A. Convicted by Earthquack, Exempt from purgatory by papal indulgence "I have a miraculous picture of Jesus - if you look really closely at the face, you can see a burnt tortilla"
From: BuddyThunder on 4 Jul 2008 02:58 rbwinn wrote: > On Jul 3, 2:35 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: >> rbwinn wrote: >>> On Jul 2, 6:11 pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)" >>> <alwh...(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: >>>> On Jul 3, 9:59 am, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: >>>>> On Jul 2, 1:28 pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)" >>>>> <alwh...(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: >>>>>> On Jul 2, 11:30 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Jul 2, 12:13 am, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)" >>>>>>> <alwh...(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Jul 2, 3:34 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Jul 1, 6:43 pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)" >>>>>>>>> <alwh...(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Jul 2, 11:27 am, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 1, 1:14 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 1, 12:34 am, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 30, 12:25 am, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 28, 6:06�pm, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:26:59 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in alt.atheism: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 28, 12:50?pm, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:11:54 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in alt.atheism: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 28, 7:17?am, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 07:05:42 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in alt.atheism: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 28, 12:26?am, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 27, 6:42?pm, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jack wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am upset by *people* who >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe that the Bible is anything more than mythology and try ?to impose >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beliefs on me ?using the Bible as evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How can someone impose a belief on you? ?Just believe whatever you want to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The wrong part is when people attempt to use the myth to formulate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> public policy or indoctrinate children or inform foreign policy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, actually they use fables. ?The apostles Paul said they would be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> turned to fables in the last days. ?A fable is a story about animals >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like the story about monkeys turning into humans. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wow, you're ignorant about evolution. Colour me surprised. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In what way am I ignorant about evolution? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Monkeys and humans do share a common ancestor. Your denial of the fact >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does not change that fact.- Hide quoted text - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Charles Darwin was not my ancestor. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Evolution happens. Learn to deal with reality.- Hide quoted text - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I never have believed in evolution. �I think it is a fable, just as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Paul said it was. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Paul knew nothing about it. You mock the Bible with such silly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interpretations of it.- Hide quoted text - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just believe what Paul said. You seem a little upset that I do not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe your fable. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you please identify what he said about it? Please?- Hide quoted text - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 Tim 4:3 For the time will come when they will not endure sound >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> teachers, having itching ears; >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4 And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> turned unto fables. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can't see any mention of evolution. I can't even see any description >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the theory, or even a theistic strawman description. Can you help me >>>>>>>>>>>>>> out? You made a claim that seems difficult to substantiate.- Hide quoted text - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text - >>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, I think we are getting into subject matter that is too difficult >>>>>>>>>>>>> for you. Maybe we should go back to Hezekiah's tunnel. >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not struggling, maybe you could point out the verse where evolution >>>>>>>>>>>> is singled out. Maybe he's talking about the germ theory of disease. I'm >>>>>>>>>>>> sure you believe that demons are behind illness, rather than pathogens.- Hide quoted text - >>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text - >>>>>>>>>>> Well, Paul said that in the last days, men would be turned to fables >>>>>>>>>>> to explain things. So today we see science explaining most things by >>>>>>>>>>> fables. >>>>>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn >>>>>>>>>> Please explain how "evolution" counts as a fable? And we'll show you >>>>>>>>>> how you understanding of evolution is horribly wrong. >>>>>>>>>> Al- Hide quoted text - >>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text - >>>>>>>>> Well, as Paul pointed out, in the last days men would be unable to >>>>>>>>> endure sound doctrine and would devise a fable to try to explain the >>>>>>>>> existence of mankind without a God. >>>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn >>>>>>>> That doesn't relate evolution to a fable. >>>>>>>> Do you ever answer a question that isn't just from your own >>>>>>>> imagination? >>>>>>>> Al- Hide quoted text - >>>>>>>> - Show quoted text - >>>>>>> It happened just the way Paul said it would. >>>>>>> Robert B. Winn >>>>>> If you want to converse with the voices in your head, could you just >>>>>> leave out alt.atheism in your replies? Your posts are clearly not >>>>>> related to anything you're clicking reply on. >>>>>> Al- Hide quoted text - >>>>>> - Show quoted text - >>>>> As I understand it I have given a response to one of your posts that >>>>> does not comform to atheistic rules. >>>>> Robert B. Winn >>>> Those would be those rules about not lying blatantly? >>>> They're more like guidelines, and more Human than specifically >>>> atheist. >>> Well, Al, I always try to tell the truth. Sometimes I am given >>> information by atheists that turns out to be false, such as a large >>> portion of what I was taught in school. >> I'd love some examples of these "atheistic lies". You won't provide any >> though, right?- Hide quoted text - >> > > Well, we could start with Albert Einstein's description of > transmission of light, which is not a lie, but turns out to be false. > It requires a bona fide miracle to work. This is one miracle that > atheists never criticize. Can we get a real physicist with a loony filter here to translate?
From: Steve O on 4 Jul 2008 03:03
<hhyapster(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:f439739b-df39-4426-ad02-e6a1c711f3fa(a)z24g2000prf.googlegroups.com... > On Jul 4, 12:29 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: >> On Jul 3, 3:52�pm, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: >> >> > On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 21:57:37 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> >> > wrote >> > in alt.atheism: >> > >> the reason might be that you're a pathological liar, projecting your >> > >> problem onto everyone else.- Hide quoted text - >> >> > >> - Show quoted text - >> >> > >Sorry, but I do personally know a woman who was given that choice. >> > >Maybe we can all wait until we are resurrected, and I can introduce >> > >her to you. >> >> > Apparently you cannot tell the truth while you are alive.- Hide quoted >> > text - >> >> > - Show quoted text - >> >> I can tell the truth. No atheist can accept it. As Paul said, they >> will be unable to endure sound doctrine, but will heap unto themselves >> teachers, having itching ears. >> Robert B. Winn You're quoting this Paul person as if he had some kind of authority. Why? -- Steve O a.a. #2240 (Apatheist Chapter) B.A.A.W.A. Convicted by Earthquack, Exempt from purgatory by papal indulgence "I have a miraculous picture of Jesus - if you look really closely at the face, you can see a burnt tortilla" > > The trouble is, truth is the least in your mind. > Or you choose to be blind. |