Prev: Linksys 54G wireless Problem
Next: Newsgroups demise
From: Your Name on 31 May 2010 00:13 In article <l46606tl3ff11ohqunb3mlr2598fo2f2gi(a)4ax.com>, John Navas <jnspam1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > On Mon, 31 May 2010 13:11:28 +1200, your.name(a)isp.com (Your Name) wrote > in <your.name-3105101311280001(a)203-109-168-210.dial.dyn.ihug.co.nz>: > > >In article <0bn5065qj41ptfcpi6utakj7v2h5kpont4(a)4ax.com>, John Navas > ><jnspam1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > > > >> On Mon, 31 May 2010 09:02:27 +1200, "Your Name" <your.name(a)isp.com> > >> wrote in <htuke8$2e9$1(a)lust.ihug.co.nz>: > >> > >> >Apple rarely gets it completely wrong, and when they (supposedly) do it's > >> >really a matter of mis-timing, e.g. the Newton was cancelled just as > >> >everybody else started jumping on the PDA bandwagon. > >> > >> Newton was canceled because Apple got it completely wrong. > > > >Yep, Apple got it wrong ... that explains why so many other companies > >jumped on the bandwagon only a couple of years later. :-\ > > > >The only things Apple got wrong with the Newton was the price and > >releasing it before it was really ready (resulting in problems with the > >handwriting recognition for many people). > > What actually eventually succeeded was netbooks, which had nothing to do > with things Apple. Netbooks are nothing to do with PDAs, Newtons nor iPads.
From: Your Name on 31 May 2010 00:15 In article <300520101906423874%nospam(a)nospam.invalid>, nospam <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> wrote: > In article <l46606tl3ff11ohqunb3mlr2598fo2f2gi(a)4ax.com>, John Navas > <jnspam1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > > > >The only things Apple got wrong with the Newton was the price and > > >releasing it before it was really ready (resulting in problems with the > > >handwriting recognition for many people). > > > > What actually eventually succeeded was netbooks, which had nothing to do > > with things Apple. > > yet another invalid comparison. > > one of the main reasons palm succeeded over newton was because palm was > the right size. newton was too big. Personally I prefer the Newton's size - true it was too big to fit in a pocket, but the Palm was too small to be useful (and had a hopeles OS and second-rate "handwriting" recognition that was nothing of the kind).
From: Your Name on 31 May 2010 00:17 In article <300520101904356258%nospam(a)nospam.invalid>, nospam <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> wrote: > > the ipad is *not* a laptop or netbook. why do people keep comparing it > to one? Because they dumber than a tree stump. Plus of course even dumber journalists keep calling the iPad "Apple's netbook".
From: nospam on 31 May 2010 00:16 In article <your.name-3105101615510001(a)203-109-170-215.dial.dyn.ihug.co.nz>, Your Name <your.name(a)isp.com> wrote: > Personally I prefer the Newton's size - true it was too big to fit in a > pocket, but the Palm was too small to be useful (and had a hopeles OS and > second-rate "handwriting" recognition that was nothing of the kind). the newton fit in a jacket pocket just fine, something the ipad cannot do.
From: Your Name on 31 May 2010 00:20
In article <elmop-B35570.23351330052010(a)news.eternal-september.org>, "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop(a)nastydesigns.com> wrote: > In article > <your.name-3105101321040001(a)203-109-168-210.dial.dyn.ihug.co.nz>, > your.name(a)isp.com (Your Name) wrote: > > > > Steve Jobs Hisself put out the round hockey-puck mouse, which everyone > > > immediately acknowledged as the worst idea in the world. > > > > Here we go with the sweeping statement yet again. :-\ > > Personally I never had any problems with the round puck-mouse, and neither > > did anyone I helped who owned one. > > Bullshit. That's nothing but an apologist stance, insisting that Apple > can do no wrong. > > If you know anything about Apple, you know about the amount of money > they spent on human factors research. You then know about the amount of > money Steve Jobs threw down the toilet when he ignored all that research > over the previous 15 years and decided that he knew best, and that the > round mouse would ship. Here we go again. yet another anti-Apple nutter who apparently knows better than I do whether or not I had problems using the round mouse. Another idiot to add to the ignore list. :-\ |